Dyno Mule to Test 351C Intakes on the Intake Adapter, Carb and EFI

[ROBSREDFORD]

Jay did you ever run a fe Victor and fe Performer rpm or tunnel wedge on this. I just binge read this

[jayb]

No, although I may run those intakes in the future.  The original idea behind this one was to test the different 351C manifolds on the intake adapter, so I didn't run any conventional FE intakes.

[Joe-JDC]

If you do, use a coat of lithium grease(white grease) on the MR G 102 gasket, and the manifolds will come off and you can reuse the gasket for several intake changes.  Saves money, time, and works great.  I did 12 manifold changes on one set of gaskets using the white grease on the gasket.  Joe-JDC

PS.  Re-apply white grease between manifold changes to get best results.

[ROBSREDFORD]

Jay ~ thanks for the response. Was only curious for educational reasons to know how compared to standard non adaptor stuff

Joe Jdc I’d still like to get some porting done by you...

[jayb]

I can tell you this much about the comparison testing Rob, when I first started making the intake adapters I tested a standard FE Performer RPM, and then my intake adapter with the 351C Performer RPM.  The results were nearly identical.

[no1musclecar]

Aloha Jay, I was just moving some parts around and found this 351C intake, and it looks like it will be a decent fit on the 13001 adapter, after a little modification by the water passage. Is this one you've tested? Its a M-9424-W351, but was modified and cut for a 9.2" deck before I got it.
Aloha,
Robert

[jayb]

I have not tested that one, but it looks like it should work pretty well.  Can't say for sure without actual dyno results, though...