Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cjshaker

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 308
1
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: BP 475 FE For My Mach 1
« on: October 26, 2026, 09:56:46 PM »
Awesome engine! That will rip in your mustang. I have put some miles on mine now and it is a handful to say the least, as it will lose traction going 80 mph bad enough to swap lanes on the highway. Have fun!

Jaime, your engine certainly turned out good! I hope you post up some track times when you get them, and stay safe on those roads! I've got a load of changing to do to my car, starting with an 8 point.

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: Engine break-in, one carb on a 2x4 manifold
« on: October 26, 2026, 09:30:09 PM »
If all you'll be using it for is the 2500 RPM break-in, you'll probably be okay. The factory progressive linkage only uses the main carbs primaries for idling and lower RPMs with no load. You should be able to get the desired RPM with just that initial step on the linkage, under no load, which means one carb should work. I would NOT try upping the RPM beyond break-in with just one carb. It would likely end up being very lean on several cylinders, which means lots of heat in those cylinders. Under no circumstances should it be driven that way.

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: New 2x4 carburetors for fe
« on: October 26, 2026, 09:18:55 PM »
Nowhere is the intended usage mentioned, which is important. Since this is, I assume, an original '67 GT 500, I'm gonna guess that they won't be slamming gears on the strip or tearing up the pavement on roadways. If it's just going to be a cruiser, the 450's would work okay, the 600's would be better for power, and the 780's would be overkill. If you want to have some fun and not limit the engine, the 600's would be a good choice. The 780's would be the better choice if you want max power and/or want to race....but I doubt that's what you're after. I would avoid the 660's for a street car.

FYI, the repro 600's work fine on my car, street and strip. They did take a little bit of tuning to get smooth transitions, but nothing major. They are a compromise of the factory BJ/BK's, basically just standard Holleys set up to work with the factory linkage, so won't be perfect out of the box.

4
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: BP 475 FE For My Mach 1
« on: October 18, 2026, 12:51:27 AM »
I think 69’s are about the same as ‘67 & ‘68 wheel well openings. (Correct me if I’m wrong) I didn’t want to cut my wheel wells for larger tires so I started off with 29” bias slicks, they rubbed, too much tire growth. I went down to a 28” Hoosier and they clear fine but put me through the lights at 7600rpm with 4.86 gear. After 20 runs I took them off and went to a 30” radial from Hoosier the one with the smaller roll out. They are actually about 29.5 but don’t grow like the bias tires. They clear ok, have to be a little careful exiting the track sharply with any speed, so far so good no rub marks and dropped 300rpm.

Mike, it's a stick shift car, and as far as I know, radials don't play well with stick cars. Pretty sure I'll have to go to a 4.5* gear to get my desired trap RPM, so I have another spare rear to look forward to, but I was debating on stepping up to 35 spline axles anyway.  ::)

5
Member Projects / Re: '62 Galaxie Progress Report
« on: October 17, 2026, 12:39:15 AM »
Mike, that is looking really good, as all your stuff does. I have a bit of a soft spot for '62s, seeing as how I spent the first 10 years of my life riding in my Mom's '62 4dr. It was a 292 car though. My Dad had a couple of 500 XL Sunliners, but never got around to restoring them. Those cars had beautiful interiors with the console.

6
On my Mustang, I didn't like the front upwards bolt over 30 years ago and was able to fish a nut on the back through a seam on the top of the rail. 

That had to be an exercise in patience! I've done stuff like that before, so I know how difficult it can be getting that bolt started with a loose nut on the backside. Just lining it up can be a challenge. :P

7
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: BP 475 FE For My Mach 1
« on: October 10, 2026, 05:05:16 PM »
great build for a killer car.how did the oil pan do on the dyno?as for oil presure.i am trying to decide for my build between that pan and the wide pan they offer.

Oil pressure was steady on the dyno with the deep Canton pan and screen tray. I'll be using an accumulator in the car, just to be safe. I stayed away from the wide pan because it limits the available space for header primary tubes. Things are already tight in a Mustang compartment.

8
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: BP 475 FE For My Mach 1
« on: October 10, 2026, 02:56:48 PM »
Not sure what you’re looking at in the fuel pump area, I went Magnafuel MP-4601.  So, adjustable bypass, 10AN in and out, and the volume I wanted, then an adjustable 4 port regulator at the engine, so far very pleased.

I already have an adjustable Aeromotive regulator, so just need to get a pump, which I haven't looked at yet. I'll probably go with size 10's also, just to know I won't be running out of fuel, along with a custom pickup to feed it.

Wicked pump gas engine.
Might need more gear? How tall are the slicks?
Congrats!

I have 28" slicks, and I don't want to go modifying my wheelwells, so likely stuck with that size, although I may be able to pick up a couple of inches if I relocate the rear. My Currie housing is narrowed 2" so I could try and keep things tucked in, and I have clearance with my springs with the backspacing on my rims, so that's not an issue. Currently have 4.30 gears, which puts me through the traps at 6500 with my current tires and combo. I may be able to keep that gearing with the goal of going through at 7500, but I'll just have to wait and see how it plays out.

9
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: BP 475 FE For My Mach 1
« on: October 09, 2026, 02:04:28 AM »
That’s great Doug. Should wake that Mach 1 right up. What are you doing with your top loader. I’m imagining there’s another upgrade happening.

Joe, I put a Jerico DR4-4 with a Long shifter in it almost 8 years ago, the same time I switched to 4.30 gears. I will need to upgrade to a Sof-Lok clutch to get it to live though, but I also have plans of getting a G-Force sometime soon.

10
FE Engine Dyno Results / BP 475 FE For My Mach 1
« on: October 08, 2026, 09:30:25 PM »
After several years of curve balls, and a couple of bean balls being thrown at me by life, I finally got around to getting Blair to put this engine together and dynoed. The goal was a stout street/race engine that I could have fun with at the track and still do a Drag Week event if I decided to do so again. That meant dependability and durability was a priority. I also wanted something strong enough that I could easily up the ante, should I decide to do so in the future, which seems to be a constant with my Mach.

I spent an entire day at Blair's dynoing the engine, and after getting the A/F right with jetting, he worked his magic on the 660 carbs, not exactly known for their streetability. Watching someone who truly knows how to tune an engine, not just getting A/F right, but actually working the carbs in a staggered fashion to get each cylinder even and performing to its potential was a special treat. I've been around a fair number of dyno runs, even in competitions, and I can tell you that there are only a limited number of people who can tune like Blair. He picked up another 25+hp just by balancing the cylinder mixtures for each cylinder, and on a single plane Tunnel Wedge to boot. He also adjusted part throttle/load mixtures to get a smoother street engine, then worked the idle mixture to make for a much smoother and happier engine overall. It sounded like a different engine by the end of the day.

A huge thank you to Blair for putting this together for me, everything he taught me while I was there (again), and his great crew at his shop, who helped me fix a busted brake line that happened just as we were loading the engine, right before a 500 mile trip home. 10 minutes later and I would have been going 75mph on I-75, so the Big Guy upstairs was looking out for me.

Torque was flat as a pancake for 1500 RPM, and the HP nearly matched it. A 1.59 HP per CI is impressive. I've got some work ahead of myself to make the car ready for this engine. Luckily, I've already got 95% of everything I need, I just waited to match a fuel pump and system for the horsepower, and new 5 point harness so it wasn't dated out.

Engine specs....

Performance Summary:
      Cubic Inches:  475                         
      Peak Horsepower:  759 @ 6960
      Peak Torque:  619 @ 5160

Engine Specifications:

   Block: SOG Iron Block  4.35 Bore
     
   Crankshaft: Crower 4.00 stroke, 2.00 rod journal
     
   Connecting Rods: Crower

   Pistons: CP, 11:1

   Camshaft: Bullet custom solid roller

   Lifters: Crower HIPPO solid roller

   Cylinder heads: BP Pro Port
 
   Rocker arms: T&D paired, custom offset, custom ratios

   Pushrods: Manton 3/8 x .145

   Distributor: Ford, vacuum advance removed, custom curve

   Intake manifold: TFS Tunnel Wedge, worked and matched to Pro Ports

   Carburetor: 2x Holley 660

   Balancer: ATI Super Damper

   Water Pump: In car a CVR pump and FEPower adapters will be used.

  Video of dyno run:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07CjvUkG7r0&lc=Ugz0BL-p-fRlrnaOgjt4AaABAg




11
I ran my car for years with power steering and the drop bracket without any problems. I will say that I've seen a couple of cars in my lifetime that did have an issue, and it was always from the threads being stripped in the lower frame nut. One may have been caused by really bad roads, or abuse, but I believe the others were just ham fisted when tightened and made the threads weak. In that case, more serious work is needed to properly fix it.

12
Ditto what Rory said. You'd have to butcher the header pipes, and even then I don't think there would be any way to get them through without dropping them under the cylinder so low that they would be road graders. That's why I used the power steering control valve eliminator and just got rid of the whole system. Only issue with that is the ratio is not real street friendly, and it takes some muscle to steer unless you change out the box and pitman arm to get the non-power steering ratio back.

13
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Bad road test for me and my Galaxie
« on: October 07, 2026, 04:44:56 PM »
Dang, Alan, that is a major bummer. Do you have enough left over paint to match a repair? Did you forget to tighten the lug nuts? I did that once but was lucky enough to catch it before I lost the wheel. Your Galaxie is beautiful, so I hope you can get it back to the original point it was before this.

14
I fixed the problem by making a turnbuckle strap to go from the head to the sway bar mount. It's a perfect lineup, easy to make, and it stopped the pecking. It also helps the motor mount to live longer.
It also keeps the clutch linkage happy in a three pedel car  :D

You're absolutely right. There's a multitude of benefits to keeping the engine from twisting.on stock rubber motor mounts. At the very least, they should be through bolted. It'll save a lot of damage from happening should it break.

15
I agree a Monte Carlo bar is needed, but top bolt interference is typical with cylinder #5, especially with the extra bracing on a CJ car. Ford never used the top/bottom bolts on those cars for that reason.

On mine, I was aware of this issue when I was restoring the body, so I took a rosebud torch and a 4x4 chunk of wood, heated it cherry red where that bolt is and beat it back against the shock tower. Usually there's about a 1/4" gap or more there where you can gain a little room. I managed to get all 16 bolts in, but that #5 top bolt still pecked at the brace, and yes, it's annoying. I fixed the problem by making a turnbuckle strap to go from the head to the sway bar mount. It's a perfect lineup, easy to make, and it stopped the pecking. It also helps the motor mount to live longer.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 308