Finalized my path on 67 mustang project

[Russ67Scode]

ScotiaFE that was leaving at 1800 rpm ! Steel flywheel 5 speed and 4.57 gears, .030 390 ported edelbrocks factory dual quad intake hooker headers and a 25 yr old comp cam
I think I have the chassis working pretty good for now
Plan is for a 8 point cage

[ScotiaFE]

Make sure you got it nailed down hard.
That 520 incher will do some bucking if not.

[Russ67Scode]

We are going to work with some solid motor mounts and a bar on the drivers side after all the turbo piping is installed
What's funny is talking to Blair and he says this should be interesting

[ec164]

Very cool project, look forward to seeing it done and flying.....Al

[Russ67Scode]

Got most of the fuel system finished up this is all moving much slower than I had anticipated
Working for a living is getting in the way of my car habit
I forgot how much I hated making up braided line

[Russ67Scode]

I do have a small problem. The pushin filler cap or in my case the crankcase evac cap hits the export brace   So another set of VC's should fix this but which set ? Are the Aluminum CJ style much shorter ?  Or get the BT with the holes up front ?

[Russ67Scode]

So the engine was ran on the Dyno
520 ci BBM heads and block. Small hyd. Roller cam (idles at 800 rpm) 9 to 1 compression on 93 octane, locked out timing at 32 deg.  662 tq and 617 hp. Next comes a pair of 69 mm turbos and EFI

[cjshaker]

Russ, looks like you've got a bit of torque to spare on that one! And a nice wide torque band too. With 2 turbos added, and EFI, that should make for a very VERY interesting ride. I hope you have lots of clean underwear!

[turbohunter]

Wow
All that naturally aspirated power in a 1st gen mustang. You're a sick man adding turbos.
I LOVE IT

[Russ67Scode]

With 2 turbos added, and EFI, that should make for a very VERY interesting ride. I hope you have lots of clean underwear!

Too funny  had the same statement about my 32 bantam 351C and fogger NOS system, and the fox body mustang with a kaase headed 514 ci

[Joey120373]

Wow, that is a monster now, going to be a bit insane with the turbos... I noticed the A/F ratio looked a bit rich on the dyno sheet, was that on purpose for the turbo tune? looks like its in the mid 11-1 for most of the pull, usually you would want that to be 12.5-13 ish wouldn't you?
Your N/A motor is very similar to what i am planning for my old truck, 520ci, small cam etc.
I'm planning on a bit more compression and a set of pro-port heads, so should put up about the same numbers, with a bit of a bump from the compression.
Thanks for posting all the pics, that thing is epic.
Joe

[jayb]

Usually with a supercharged or turbocharged engine you want to run a bit rich,  11.5-12.0 or so.  I think his A/F is spot on for a blower application.

[Russ67Scode]

Agree but this dyno chart was NA just to check out the engine
I have a FAST EFI system in the car now so Blair just ran a carb he had on hand , also dist was locked at 32 deg.   We didn't care about all out power as the set up with the turbo's will come together in my mustang . So I am sure there is some more in it but under boost the NA numbers are going to be weak

[Joey120373]

you and i have vastly different opinions of "weak".....

[CaptCobrajet]

Wow, that is a monster now, going to be a bit insane with the turbos... I noticed the A/F ratio looked a bit rich on the dyno sheet, was that on purpose for the turbo tune? looks like its in the mid 11-1 for most of the pull, usually you would want that to be 12.5-13 ish wouldn't you?
Your N/A motor is very similar to what i am planning for my old truck, 520ci, small cam etc.
I'm planning on a bit more compression and a set of pro-port heads, so should put up about the same numbers, with a bit of a bump from the compression.
Thanks for posting all the pics, that thing is epic.
Joe

We purposefully used lower static c/r, and also the ports, both intake and exhaust are VERY large.   I wanted the big port volumes and the compression to compliment the finished product.  I left it a little rich on purpose, because as Jay said, the "tune" on the EFI will be a little richer for WOT.  Not so much for the part throttle tune.  I'll use a little less cam, and a little more static on yours Joe, and the SPP port volumes will probably bump closer to 700/700 for peaks on a purpose-built truck thumper.  The SPP move the same air....a little more actually,  as the CNC BBMs with more than 20 less CCs in the intake runner......