Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
FE Technical Forum / Re: 428 cobra jet exhaust manifolds vs gt390
« Last post by 427Fastback on October 17, 2026, 10:11:34 PM »
I have done it and the answer do they interchange is not really. There are a couple of end bolts that are half a hole out.It was no big deal I just threaded plugs in and redrilled and tapped new holes (C8AE-H heads 14 bolt). But i did it on my bench/drill press. This was over 35 years ago and I forget the details. Get some gaskets and lay them on top of each other.

The spacer does not have a butterfly in it..
42
FE Technical Forum / Re: 428 cobra jet exhaust manifolds vs gt390
« Last post by Rory428 on October 17, 2026, 09:44:42 PM »
Jay Browns excellent book "The Great FE Intake Comparo" has a section covering numerous different factory FE exhaust manifolds, and several sets of headers. The tests were performed on Jays engine dyno, with various levels of HP engines, and the factory 390 "GT" style exhaust manifolds were real dogs, basically no better than the more common low performance "log style" exhaust manifolds as used on full sized cars and pickup trucks. The 428 Cobra Jet exhaust manifolds are certainly better performing than the 390 GT versions, but still lag behind most headers. As far as I am concerned, hanging a pair of the GT exhaust manifolds on the great TFS heads, will eliminate much of the gains of the TFS heads. So if he is dead set on not using a decent set of headers, the CJ exhaust manifolds will be a better choice that the 390 GT pieces, but he will still be losing a fair bit of power. And yes, the 428 CJ exhaust manifolds should fit a 67/68 Mustang just fine. The 1969 exh. manifolds are much more common, as there were many more 428 Cobra Jet engines factory installed by Ford in 1969, than both 1968 and 1970, combined.
43
FE Technical Forum / 428 cobra jet exhaust manifolds vs gt390
« Last post by v8Dave on October 17, 2026, 04:52:04 PM »
Hello everyone.
I have a question I am asking on behalf of a elderly friend who owns a 68 gt390 coupe.
He has recently had the engine rebuilt and has stroked it to a 445 fe with trick flow heads and I believe blue thunder 4v aluminium intake manifold and has dressed it to look factory stock however with some upgrades like mentioned above plus aluminium water pump etc.
Now he has a pair of gt390 exhaust manifolds I know he wants to keep with exhaust manifolds and not switch to headers.
He asked me recently could he fit a pair of 428 cobra jet exhaust manifolds in place of his gt390 manifolds and if he switched what would be the hp/to over the gt390 manifolds?
I believe there have been tests comparing the 428 cobra jet manifolds vs different brand headers and just wondered if anyone on the forum here with all the extensive knowledge would know if and what the gain would be swapping  exhaust manifolds.
I believe I am correct in thinking the 428 cobra jet exhaust manifolds would fit in the tight engine bay of the 67/68 mustangs as the 428 cobra jet was released mid year and offered as a option in the 68 mustang.
Also I know there's the early 428 cobra jet exhaust manifolds that use a spacer on the passenger side manifold and the later 70 design that did away with the spacer on the passenger side. Am I right in saying he could use the 70 design cobra jet manifolds without the spacer to make things simple (as I believe he has converted his Carb to electric choke) and just then get a 70 mustang h pipe to bolt up to it and then fabricate his own exhaust system from there back out to the valance.
Many thanks for your time and any help or information  anyone can give is much appreciated.
Have a nice day.
44
You can pick up a extra 1.1cc using a .038 x 4.33 Clevite/Mahle 3389 gasket, over the Felpro 1020 .041 x 4.40 gasket.

.038 isn't to close.
45
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: BP 475 FE For My Mach 1
« Last post by Heo on October 17, 2026, 01:57:03 AM »
Nice result Doug, Glad that you finaly got the engine ready to run
46
Member Projects / Re: '62 Galaxie Progress Report
« Last post by cjshaker on October 17, 2026, 12:39:15 AM »
Mike, that is looking really good, as all your stuff does. I have a bit of a soft spot for '62s, seeing as how I spent the first 10 years of my life riding in my Mom's '62 4dr. It was a 292 car though. My Dad had a couple of 500 XL Sunliners, but never got around to restoring them. Those cars had beautiful interiors with the console.
47
Ok, guess there is no easy way around this.The block needs to be decked. Now L2291A pistons sit 0.024" below deck and with -10 cc recess volume compression is 9.2.
Decking the block to 0 clearance and adding set of -5 cc pistons would bring the compression up to 10.0 - 10.2 with 0.040 gasket- perfect for this pump gas Galaxie.

Thanks for your input.
48
The Edelbrocks will probably run a little fat on the chamber size, probably closer to 74.

Another option is a DSS Piston, 5cc flat top.  Would put you at around 10.0-10.1:1 set up at zero deck at TDC with a .040" gasket.
49
Autotec 1000778
50
Hi,

Street 390.Stock 3.78 stroke and connecting rods. Currently bored 0.020 and has around 9.2 with L2291 pistons.
These pistons have 1.776" compression height and 10 cc dish/ recess.
Edelbrock RPM heads with 72 cc chambers.
Targeting for 10,2-10,8 ratio.
Have not been able to find any off-the-shelf pistons yet - is a custom piston needed ?

Thanks !
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10