Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RustyCrankshaft

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 34
1
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: 3d models
« on: January 27, 2026, 12:42:30 AM »
I don't have a large 3D printer so I'm limited in the size of buck I can make. Besides, if you get real carried away the printed buck can't take the pressure trying to form a large section anyway. At least not with what's available to me. I print solid pieces. If you need to check it takes 30 seconds to unclamp it.

There are all sorts of ways to do this, but if you over-complicate it then the value starts to disappear in a hurry. In all honesty, for the amount of time I've got into this and what I actually NEED to repair, I could have hand formed the panels in about the same amount of time. But I wanted to try the sheet metal forming and I can see where there would be times that it's just not practical to hand form even if it is possible.

2
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: 3d models
« on: January 22, 2026, 01:12:27 AM »
There are 2 ways I've gotten to finished metal. I've 3d printed bucks based off the scan data before. The issue with can be size, if you are trying to do a large panel the 3d printed bucks don't hold up quite as well without some steel backers and I don't have a press big enough to do a large panel.

For the Comet I'm trying out a new process that uses a CNC metal shaper that slowly forms the panel by running a stylus over the panel to gently press the panel into shape. It's not real common for automotive applications yet so it's a little spendy. I could 3d print bucks for a LOT cheaper, but I wanted to try this at least once and see how it goes.

3
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: 3d models
« on: January 08, 2026, 10:38:20 PM »
No help for the 8-71 or the other castings, but I did just recently scan and build a surface model for the quarter panels on 65 Comet's (hardtop). So if anyone needs re-pop quarters or patch panels I have the data for them. Currently having some patches made for my project. The 3d scanning and surface modeling works pretty decent for this type of use, but it is time consuming depending on the shapes involved. The body lines on the quarter that gradually taper out to flat were a bit tuff to build the model for.

4
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: 97 Mile 1979 Lincoln MK V on BAT
« on: December 30, 2025, 01:43:36 AM »
I think it depends a little on who at BaT evaluates the potential vehicle as far as the reserve's go. They were fine with a reserve on a dentside I sold that a few years ago I would have considered a parts truck that moves under its own power. But they wouldn't let me put any reserve on a 79 Anniversary edition trans-am that had every option but the CB and 400/spd that was documented from new and had been sitting sealed in a heated garage since 1988. It still had the original tires it left the dealer lot with and I was asking for a reserve at about half what the going sale price on BaT was.

5
Member Projects / Re: Shock absorbers?
« on: December 30, 2025, 01:36:11 AM »
I have a set of QA1's on the front of my 64 Galaxie. I just put them on before it got parked for the winter so I can't say for longevity, but I have run QA1's on quick a few cars and generally been happy with them. The Vikings I've used are also decent.

The t-bar mount I'm not a fan of, but I'm not aware of anyone making lower control arms set up for a coilover for the 64's so unless I just up a stock arm I'm stuck with the t-bar style lower mount. I prefer the "uniball" style lower bearing mount to the t-bar. There is a company called PMT that says they make arms for that style coilover mount but I was never able to get ahold of them.

6
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: buick v6
« on: August 11, 2025, 11:46:32 PM »
There was a 209 inch version of the Buick V6 that was quite popular for a while. I believe they were 850ish HP at 50 inches of boost and ran a single stage scavenge pump. They had a crank scraper and some baffles to run the the oil to a "central" scavenge chamber.  I think the 209" version was to meet Indy specs. I could be completely wrong too.

7
My Galaxie does something similar but in the opposite direction. The gauge works and it does read, but it's biased significantly. Tested the sender and it was good, wiring is good. Replaced the sender anyway - no change. Mine stays on full far too long, 1/4" tank is nearly empty. Only thing I haven't checked yet is the CVR. I know its working, but I don't know if maybe the set point has drifted. That would possibly explain the bias. I also tried ground jumpers, etc. Everything individually is working fine, last 2 things are either the CVR has an issue or the gauge itself is the problem.

8
FE Technical Forum / Re: Summit branded distributor
« on: July 28, 2025, 10:35:35 PM »
I've used those aftermarket Durasparks, but one thing I discovered is that many of them won't accept a stock small cap without machining the bodies. The several I've bought, all chinesium, all had cap-adapt for the larger caps. They worked fine, and they are very inexpensive.

I haven't had to change a gear on the Pertronix yet so I can't speak to the amount of interference on the fit. I also haven't had an issue with the gears yet either.

Sounds like you already ruled it out, but for stock appearing but new:
https://pertronixbrands.com/products/pertronix-stock-look-distributor-for-ford-332-428-engines?srsltid=AfmBOoqdLj1iTVX04mIxx3k2lTEyRZaiGMO61G0flK9Wn2xhT-58H1lx

I've also had Wes Adams re-curve a points distributor and then ran a module conversion which worked well.

9
FE Technical Forum / Re: Summit branded distributor
« on: July 25, 2025, 07:39:06 PM »
I have, but not the FE version. I've used several of the Pertronix ready to run distributors in FE's and been happy with them. They use a chevy style cap, but honestly, most people these days wouldn't notice and they're decent quality for the money.

I've used the Summit brand distributor in a 454 chevy and it's been fine. My neighbor drives it several times a week during the good weather. Probably 8500 miles on it so far with no issue. I wouldn't swear to it, but I think they're re-branded TSP parts which are MSD clones. The Speedway distributors are TSP and it looked identical to the Summit one when I had both in my hand. But these days it hard to know for sure with everyone ripping off everyone else's engineering.

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: Any reason not to use head studs?
« on: July 23, 2025, 05:55:05 PM »
I have a 445 with TFS heads and ARP studs, POP stands/end stands/shafts and Brent's rockers and there wasn't any clearance issues. I didn't need studs for the power level the engine is at, but I think studs are better than bolts. For most uses bolts work just fine too.

11
Cool video, don't see much footage from a local track like that one. I recently acquired a 64 Galaxie 390 that was originally a 3 speed but someone along the line swapped a toploader out of a Fairlane into it. It's un-restored but a pretty solid car.

12
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Looking for convertible top for 62 Merc.
« on: April 01, 2025, 07:51:16 PM »
Not sure where you are at, but I've had these guys do a couple tops for me: https://www.convertiblesonly.com/

They also helped me with some parts for a 57 Fairlane retractable that had a completely non functional top.

13
FE Technical Forum / Re: Rear main seal leak
« on: March 26, 2025, 07:51:36 PM »
Where is it leaking from? The seal itself, the cap? What kind of seal? Couple of things you can try is a different brand seal or maybe one of the one piece seals. Are you using the side seals? If you are I'd probably ditch those. I've had much better luck filling those full of a good quality RTV.

14
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: 352 Daily Driver 438 hp/456 tq
« on: March 25, 2025, 04:56:56 PM »
Looks like a really cool build and would make a nice commuter and still fun to drive. Really neat seeing the real world difference on those Kugel cast headers. Surprisingly good when you consider dyno headers are usually better than any of the chassis headers to start with. Been considering a set of those Kugel's for my near stock 390 in my Galaxie. Like them even more now.

15
Member Projects / Re: 64 Galaxie control arm and header questions
« on: March 13, 2025, 10:56:57 PM »
I've used the Borgeson stuff in a Mustang and 2 Fairlanes (as well as few brand X projects) and have been pretty happy with their stuff. I don't really have a problem with the power assist stuff, but an integral box is definitely a lot nicer and a cleaner set up. As soon as I figure out the exhaust situation I'll probably order the new steering gear. I'd also expect to have to fiddle with the pump a little since I'd like to keep the stock Eaton pump.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 34