Author Topic: UT Bore Inspection  (Read 7206 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cyclone Joe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • Joe
    • View Profile
UT Bore Inspection
« on: November 24, 2017, 05:27:45 PM »
Howdy!
Can anybody recommend  good shop for UT inspection of bores?  I have my 390 and its been punched 0.060" already.  It was running well before I took it apart and I'm about ready to buy a Prison Break kit for it, but before I do, I want to make sure I dont have any thin spots.

I'm in the Sacramento Area but I'm willing to drive the block to the Bay if need be.

Thanks in advance,
Joe

thatdarncat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1866
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2017, 09:56:17 PM »
Joe, you may want to consider buying your own Ultrasonic Tester. Jay Brown bought one of these a while ago when he started picking up those used 428 blocks. He was happy with it and on his recommendation I bought one off eBay too almost a year ago. Price at the time was about $117 shipped. The transducer is flat, so you need to use some sandpaper and give it a gentle curve to match the cylinder bores, wasn’t too hard to do. I was paying about $60 to have a block tested at a local shop ( sorry, in Minnesota), so for the price of 2 sonic tests I own my own tester. And you will be able to check as many spots in a cylinder as you want. Maybe Jay will chime in. Just a thought.



« Last Edit: April 20, 2018, 12:48:58 AM by thatdarncat »
Kevin Rolph

1967 Cougar Drag Car ( under constuction )
1966 7 litre Galaxie
1966 Country Squire 390
1966 Cyclone GT 390
1968 Torino GT 390
1972 Gran Torino wagon
1978 Lincoln Mk V

Cyclone Joe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • Joe
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2017, 01:00:11 AM »
Kevin,
Thanks for this!  This is sure a heck of a lot cheaper than the $1,000 units I was looking at earlier.  Looks like Santa came early for me!

Joe

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1458
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2017, 07:41:15 AM »
I got one of those $130.oo deals off Amazon.  Same deal, just had to put a slight curve on the pickup. Compared it to the $1500 kit and for me and what i do with it i called it close enough..
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

GJCAT427

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2017, 09:07:09 AM »
What make/model did Jay get?

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4460
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2017, 09:24:02 AM »
So did anyone check it for accuracy? Seems like it would be easy enough to do, using some plate steel, or even better, the skirt of the block, since that has the same metallic composition. Just curious how accurate it is.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

Heo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3287
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2017, 09:30:45 AM »
A friend have one like that that i used. I tested
it against the China Wall and some other cast iron
Parts i had that was easy to meassure with calipers
And it was accurate after i put new batteries in it



The defenition of a Gentleman, is a man that can play the accordion.But dont do it

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1458
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2017, 09:42:18 AM »
Mine tested reasonably accurate compared to the high $ rig at my friends machine shop. Once it got up around one inch thickness the numbers started getting off. I fig i wouldn't be using it for anything over a half inch anyway.  For sure always a good idea to use fresh batteries.  Down side to my little cheap rig is it only measures in mm, not a huge deal though. Good enough for a quick ball park test at swap meets and junkyards.
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3853
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2017, 09:58:20 AM »
Cool stuff fellas! I had read about Jay's tester before and liked the idea. Didn't know some followed his lead and bought similar units. Testing, as noted, s/b easy. I'll add that I'd use a broken off China wall chunk (easy to stick in your tool box) to validate the accuracy each and every time as this also may indicate the need for new batteries.

Here's another reason. The density and composition of cast iron does differ from say a thick aluminum or steel plate. While a tester should read the same way, you can prove or disprove this by actual back-to-back tests.
Bob Maag

Heo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3287
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2017, 10:51:45 AM »
You have the calibration pad on the tester
But i tested with castiron to be sure and got some
Strange numbers so i put in new bateries



The defenition of a Gentleman, is a man that can play the accordion.But dont do it

ntheogen

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2017, 11:39:39 AM »
So what brand did you guys buy or use? I'm going to grab one at that little of an investment.

Jack

Cyclone Joe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
  • Joe
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2017, 11:58:19 AM »

thatdarncat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1866
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2017, 12:04:38 PM »
Sorry my picture wasn't clearer, it's a UM6500. There's no "Brand" name on it, but if you search eBay there are multiple sellers. This one will read in both inch & MM, as was pointed out above a few varieties of these ( but not this model ) only read in MM. It has multiple settings for type of material to measure, one of them works accurately for our FE cast blocks ( I always forget which ). Make sure when you are using it you are on the correct setting, a couple times after I had the batteries out I forgot to put it back on the proper material setting and spent time getting useless readings, just a tip. Also, a tip Jay gave me - it comes with a little bottle of couplant gel that you have to put on the transducer, Petroleum Jelly ( like Vasoline ) works just as well and is cheap. 
« Last Edit: April 20, 2018, 12:49:54 AM by thatdarncat »
Kevin Rolph

1967 Cougar Drag Car ( under constuction )
1966 7 litre Galaxie
1966 Country Squire 390
1966 Cyclone GT 390
1968 Torino GT 390
1972 Gran Torino wagon
1978 Lincoln Mk V

Gregg

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2017, 01:03:41 PM »
I have read on another forum where someone changed the flat transducer to curved for cylinders and rendered the transducer useless.  I hope Jay jumps in here with more information.

thatdarncat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1866
    • View Profile
Re: UT Bore Inspection
« Reply #14 on: November 26, 2017, 01:18:22 PM »
It’s such a small amount of curve you’re putting into it that it’s hard to even get a representative picture, but here you go. We did it by hand with a sanding block and lots of patience. Check your progress as you go against a cylinder wall until you reach a decent match. You want to sand on the sides and not across that narrow metal strip in the center. I wouldn’t do it on the bench grinder lol. Works fine.

« Last Edit: April 20, 2018, 12:50:38 AM by thatdarncat »
Kevin Rolph

1967 Cougar Drag Car ( under constuction )
1966 7 litre Galaxie
1966 Country Squire 390
1966 Cyclone GT 390
1968 Torino GT 390
1972 Gran Torino wagon
1978 Lincoln Mk V