428CJ exhaust manifolds in 67-72 F250?

[AlanCasida]

As I slowly return to utilizing my '67 F250 2wd as my towing truck I am looking at pulling the 390 and putting the 428CJ motor in it that I have had forever. While considering this I thought it might be cool to make it look like someone had swapped a CJ motor in it back in the day, manifolds and all. So I was wondering if anyone has tried to use those exhaust manifolds in their F100/250 and how they fit.   

[MRadke]

Barry Gaugler (sp?)  used to have a manifold interchange on his Spookytruck.net website, but I don't see it there now.  Maybe drop an email to him to see whether he still has it in his files.

[Dr Mabuse]

Chart:

[AlanCasida]

Chart:

Thank you sir! Were there footnotes that went with this chart? I saw some of the "yeses" had numbers beside them.

[Dr Mabuse]

Try again ...

[GJCAT427]

 I have to admit that the 427 long tubes will fit into the 56 F100, I own one with them. You have to remove the original rear crossmember that the rear bellhousing sat on and refab a lower crossmember. I also fabbed some side mount engine mounts and a tranny mount crossmember.

[Dr Mabuse]

I have to admit that the 427 long tubes will fit into the 56 F100
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Which long tubes did you use - the '62-'64, or '65-'66?

[BattlestarGalactic]

I tried to dry fit my long tubes on my 69 f100 and knew that lower crossmember would have to be cut apart to clear things.  Even std headers are a close fit and I always cut the flanges off and use slip joints and band clamps.

[Dr Mabuse]

I tried to dry fit my long tubes on my 69 f100 and knew that lower crossmember would have to be cut apart to clear things.  Even std headers are a close fit and I always cut the flanges off and use slip joints and band clamps.

slip joints and band clamps? -- I gave up on band clamps - they always failed to hold their clamp for me - I have gone to ball-socket flange and V-band types:

[GJCAT427]

  I used the 62-64s