Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - e philpott

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 68
1
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Retirement finalized.
« on: December 03, 2025, 01:40:27 PM »
Congrats on retiring and I hope your wife health improves

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: Beneficial to put CJ valves in a 390 GT Head?
« on: December 03, 2025, 10:10:01 AM »
If you do the appropriate bowl work with the larger valves it should pickup flow, I have no before or after but most of us clean up the ports and open up the throats accordingly when you go bigger valves, I did that on some 2.10/1.65 valves for C1AE's in my 63 Fairlane 390 with mild cam 237/247at .050 with 559/579 lift Lunati solid lifter and 3x2's (not the best intake) run a nice 12.50 at 108 good air and 12.78's hot and humid at Kilkare now called Dorona Xenia in Ohio and real driveable on the street

3
good pictures , that Charger looks really interesting

4
FE Technical Forum / Re: fire jumping plug wires
« on: November 24, 2025, 10:19:07 AM »
Cheap wires or you don't have them plugged all the way on to the spark plug, spark finds the easiest way to go

5
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: 541 cubic inch FE drag and drive
« on: November 07, 2025, 09:44:27 AM »
Only 51 more HP than the last conventional Pro Port headed piece we had in it, but this thing has a lot more area under the curves.  It has its peak torque for almost 1000 rpm, and same with the power.  The billet head is a serious departure from the OE layout.  The valve orientation is the same, but they are canted and the ports are tilted.  Meanest head there is that bolts on the top of an FE block.  Some day I want to do a 4” crank in an iron BBM block and spin it about 10,000 rpm with heads like this.

Blair is that 51 horsepower difference with the same drag week camshaft ?

6
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: 541 cubic inch FE drag and drive
« on: October 15, 2025, 01:52:00 PM »
How do you make that crank stroke fit ? Nice power !!

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: rear tire clearance left vs. right
« on: September 30, 2025, 08:30:43 AM »
I'd try loosening everything up and try to reposition Diff to spring , check the rear upper shackle mount bushings to body .

8
FE Technical Forum / Re: RUG AJ Transmision
« on: September 18, 2025, 11:22:59 AM »
do you have any pictures with the cover off ?   Liberty does a process now that's called Face Plating but what you have sounds like the older style that uses Liberty's own modified synchronizers and matching gears

9
FE Technical Forum / Re: How many billable hours to change cam and heads?
« on: September 04, 2025, 07:51:41 AM »
you can throw that book time out the window or maybe triple it might be close, no professional shop is going to want to do that job for flat rate with non original parts and you don't want someone trying to "beat" the book for flat rate either

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: BBM Head Swap
« on: August 20, 2025, 02:48:47 PM »
Sweet !! The Gonkulator was pretty accurate, is Werby still around ?

11
FE Technical Forum / Re: Holley 80496-1 carb
« on: August 18, 2025, 10:24:29 AM »
I have the annular booster version 950HP but it looks like a regular 850 body to me with very little taper at the venturi , it does have nice throttle blades with button head screws compared to the 850, I use mine on the Dove spider and got annular boosters because of the huge plenum

12
I use this with a new style tube and works great
https://www.jegs.com/i/Holley/510/26-115/10002/-1



13
FE Technical Forum / Re: cross bolt conversion cost
« on: August 05, 2025, 07:26:03 AM »
A local machine shop/hardware store took one of those early 4.1 V8 Cadilac engines apart in mid late 80's and took that bolt-in Valley saddle (or whatever you call it) in the lifter valley and that block moved several inches as soon as the last bolt was removed and popped the valley saddle out of the block, regardless of trying they never could get the block square enough to get that valley saddle back in and the block back together

14
FE Technical Forum / Re: cross bolt conversion cost
« on: July 30, 2025, 03:03:44 PM »
thrust bearing just requires more steps and doesn't really help the bottom end like 2-4 does , my own DT2 390 block is cross bolted with Pro Gram caps

15
FE Technical Forum / Re: cross bolt conversion cost
« on: July 30, 2025, 08:34:03 AM »
Blair has posted before that cross bolting 2-4 is cost effective because you don't have to mess with the thrust bearing alignment like you do when doing all three and 2-4 are the ones that have trouble

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 68