Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jim Kramer

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: E-85
« on: May 02, 2026, 11:14:30 AM »
I have used pump E85 for several years in my Mustang There are advantages and disadvantages , The consistency is a problem, I have a retard set in the MSD box in case I get a poor batch of fuel, but the bigger problem for you would be your intermittent usage of the car, If its gonna sit for more than a week or two you would really need to dump the carb, The alcohol will eventually attack the metal_______Jim Kramer 

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: C4 to fe conversion
« on: April 13, 2026, 02:11:40 PM »
The spacers were made from an appropriately sized piece of steel tubing I found in my scrap pile, OD doesn't really matter as long as all four are the same and obviously thick enough for the strength needed     Jim Kramer   

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: C4 to fe conversion
« on: April 11, 2026, 03:37:27 PM »
Here is a quick drawing of the spacer Now also keep in mind the entire transmission will be pushed back the same distance, mount may take some modding     Jim K

4
FE Technical Forum / Re: C4 to fe conversion
« on: April 11, 2026, 03:13:12 PM »
The flywheel stays in the same place, but I did forget you also need spacers on the bolts holding the converter to the flywheel Since I changed  converters fairly frequently (it was a class car and I had about 6 different converters I worked with), I tack-welded the spacers to the flywheel  Ill try to find the crank spacer  I realize the whole thing seems a little rube goldberg, but I put hundreds of low one forty sixty foot quarter mile passes on it with zero problems and I may well put the set-up together in a street car in the future with complete confidence   Jim Kramer   

5
FE Technical Forum / Re: C4 to fe conversion
« on: April 11, 2026, 11:04:59 AM »
Two pictures show generally what was done, the only thing that really needs to be exact is the opening for the c4 pump size, everything else was done with poster board templets  All done on my little Enco type mill  The COM bellhousing is 850 thousands deeper than the C4 bell, so you have to make a spacer to put into the crankshaft to make up the difference This I made on a friends lathe out of a chunk of round stock, no big deal but it does need to be pretty exact  Kind of a week-end project  Almost no money spent, just some time ;)     Jim Kramer       also- you do have to machine a little off the c4 pump bolt  heads  to fit better into the reliefs cut into the com bellhousing  The com bellhousing is considerably thicker than the c4 so I don't think strength is an issue

6
FE Technical Forum / Re: C4 to fe conversion
« on: April 10, 2026, 11:06:45 AM »
i did use the c6 converter I will dig the thing out and post a couple pictures and then try to explain what I did     Jim Kramer

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: C4 to fe conversion
« on: April 09, 2026, 11:53:26 AM »
i have done it It takes a little fabrication and welding, but not that much and results in a perfectly servicable piece  I used mine in my D/SA mustang for 12 years with no problems____Jim Kramer

8
Sorry for the thread drift   but wasn't the story that someone had managed to purchase a bunch of late production side oiler rejects that were supposed to be destroyed and they had surfaced several years ago up for sale?          Jim Kramer

9
FE Technical Forum / Re: FE to C4 Bellhousing
« on: November 26, 2025, 12:20:12 PM »
I did such a modification on my 390 Mustang race car, ran it for several years with 0 problems     Jim Kramer

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: New 427 Cobra
« on: September 28, 2025, 11:50:40 AM »
man, it would be extremely interesting to see that man work and see the bucks/forms/fixtures that he uses     Jim Kramer

11
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Tom Posthuma - Farewell to a great FE guy
« on: November 05, 2024, 11:54:25 AM »
Really sorry to hear this   I always enjoyed reading his informative and practical posts  Common sense approach  He was also a good ambassador for Canada  RIP   --Jim Kramer






12
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Wifes nephew
« on: May 19, 2024, 11:54:28 AM »
Maybe the best story you have told. Love it......Jim Kramer

13
FE Technical Forum / Re: big ,med, or small block
« on: November 26, 2023, 11:52:49 AM »
Joe everything you said is true, however a MR head will outflow a big port bbc head up to about .300 lift and stock eliminator camshafts are limited to stock .500/.525 lift, so at these levels the MR head actually could have a slight advantage......Jim Kramer 

14
Drag Strip Results for FE Powered Vehicles / Re: 79 Foxbody Mustang FE 445
« on: September 13, 2023, 12:11:33 PM »
Your times aren't bad at all using NHRA's altitude correction factors down to a sea level track brings your numbers to 10.60 @ 127 mph..........Jim Kramer

15
FE Technical Forum / Re: Rocker Adjuster Wear - Rapid
« on: June 27, 2023, 09:00:41 AM »
I had this exact problem, pushrod oiling holes and such. In my case I was using Isky iron rockers. It wasn't so much the oiling hole itself but the pushrod cup was slightly too big to match ball of the adjuster. The contact area between the two was too small made worse by the oiling hole being there. It wore the ball end exactly as you described. I changed to a spair set of pushrods I had that fit better, no problems in about 5000 miles.....Jim Kramer   

Pages: [1] 2 3 4