Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jim Kramer

Pages: 1 [2] 3
16
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Question for the clutch masters..
« on: January 30, 2022, 10:48:00 AM »
I think probably that would be the next step. Thanks all for your responses......Jim Kramer

17
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Question for the clutch masters..
« on: January 29, 2022, 10:35:26 AM »
It does look like the arm is askew, but it doesn't seem to be. Instead it looks like maybe it wasn't in the fixture properly when it was machined. Anyhow I drew a picture that hopefully will show it more clearly. The angle is exaggerated for clarity. Thanks......Jim Kramer

18
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Question for the clutch masters..
« on: January 28, 2022, 11:58:28 PM »
Yes they all have a radius that slides on the face of the TO bearing, but this " slant " is on the perpendicular plane to that radius. I tried to show with my pictures the amount of that " slant " compared to a true 90 degrees from say the face of the pressure plate. I realize that how I'm explaining this might be somewhat difficult to understand and I appreciate your taking the time to understand it........Jim Kramer 

19
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Question for the clutch masters..
« on: January 28, 2022, 08:32:10 PM »
I am replacing a diaphragm type clutch with a long style. Upon the inspection of my new pressure plate I find a possible problem. It appears as though the machining of one of the lever tips, ( where the TO bearing rides ), is not accurate. It seems to be beveled. Hopefully  my attached pictures show this clearly. Its only one of the levers. How critical is this? Can I dress this down? If I do it will leave this lever a few thousandths lower than the others. How critical would that be? The car is a street driven 67 Mustang 450-500 hp. It would be nice to be able to button this back up without a lot of dinking around but I dont want to have to go through this again in a few hundred miles. Thanks......Jim Kramer 

20
FE Technical Forum / Re: E-85 who is running it and questions
« on: January 07, 2022, 09:32:30 PM »
I built a 390 for my 67 Mustang two winters ago using parts I had on hand and ended up with about an 11.75 to 1 motor so I decided to try running pump e85 as kind of an experiment. It's been more or less satisfactory on the whole. 26I used a Carter high volume mechanical pump, and converted a 735 "U" carb I had which being vacume secondaries gave some problems on the dyno, but once sorted out gave almost identical numbers to the motor with a 750 dyno carb and race gas, 490 hp and 500 tq. My fuel tank is stock, all the lines are steel or braided Aeroquip. I used a replaceable element fuel filter. How it works.....It runs fine, maybe a little hard starting. Corrosion has been minimal. A very small amount in the carb, maybe a little more in the fuel filter housing, ( which is aluminum ). The motor will still ping at lower rpms under load, so I have a 10 degree retard switched in the MSD, and run that a lot of the time when cruising and such, ( giving me 26 degrees ). I think the inconsistency of the pump e85 has something to do with this. And the milage isnt too bad. I've only got a couple thousand miles on it buy I've checked it several times at 9.5 to 10.5 with spirited driving. Not sure I would do it again if I was building from scratch with all new parts mostly because if the limited number of stations available with e85, even here in Iowa, but it really doesn't work too badly........Jim Kramer   

21
I have used the Ni-Cop line on several cars/trucks, and agree with the praise everyone has given, BUT, I also had a critical and potentially dangerous failure. The teeth of my flaring tool bit too deeply into the line and created a stress point at the base of the flair that cracked from vibration and broke while I was driving. One pump everything was fine the next pump nothing. Make sure there are no chances of vibration in your lines, if they can't be well secured at one location or another I would use steel there........Jim Kramer

22
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: lost a member
« on: November 07, 2021, 04:27:56 PM »
No  kidding :(. I'll be damned. I've talked to him many times, ( I live maybe twenty five miles south of him ), and would see him at many of the local show/cruises. I sure wouldn't have expected this as he seemed pretty young and healthy. What a bad deal :-\. I sure hope the best for his family and friends.....Jim Kramer

23
FE Technical Forum / Re: Valve stem wear
« on: September 30, 2021, 07:57:51 PM »
Perhaps another possibility would be some sort of dirt or debris imbedded in the guide metal, or maybe if your guides were honed to size on set-up and not cleaned properly afterward.......Jim Kramer

24
Private Classifieds / Midwest Cylinder Head Repair
« on: September 01, 2021, 03:42:55 PM »
In Nevada Iowa can pretty much repair anything cast iron. Been around for many decades. Years ago a friend sent them a high-riser head that had two broken chambers and when they came back you honestly couldn't tell which chambers had been repaired.

25
FE Technical Forum / Re: Toploader Rebuild Kit
« on: July 27, 2021, 08:14:04 PM »
I bought one from Dave Kee about two years ago......all metal washers, everything fit well.     Jim Kramer

26
FE Technical Forum / Re: R-code custom
« on: April 21, 2021, 09:06:06 AM »
If I recall properly, the first of the 67 full size 427 cars got the long tube manifolds, however after that Ford decided to cheap-out and put the Fairlane manifolds on them, causing some complaints from the new owners. Ironically today the Fairlane manifolds are worth more than the long tubes are.........Jim Kramer

27
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Diaphragm or three finger clutch?
« on: April 12, 2021, 01:31:03 PM »
I installed a Ram diaphragm clutch in my 390 67 Mustang, and I do NOT like it. All of the engagement occurs within about one inch of pedal movement. I can adjust the engagement point up or down , but not the rate of engagement. Its drivable but not very handy. Mine is not the only one that works this way, I have a friend with a 390 Fairlane that works the same way..........Jim Kramer

28
FE Technical Forum / Re: Best actual Ford cast 4V intake found
« on: January 05, 2021, 05:58:08 PM »
I measured the plenum depth...4.33/2.32 for the K, 4.28/2.26 for the J, measured as near to the center of the opening as I could eyeball. I couldn't see a lot of difference in the pushrod hole centerlines. As close as I could measure they were both 2.12/2.13. The only thing I can see for sure is the plenum depth that while small is defiantly there. There must be some more extensive internal differences, but I'm not clever enough  to discern them........Jim

29
FE Technical Forum / Re: Best actual Ford cast 4V intake found
« on: January 05, 2021, 12:13:32 AM »
Well, the "K" plenum is actually about 1/16 of an inch deeper than the "J", on both sides. The pushrod holes are actually closer together on the K, however the holes themselves are considerably bigger. I'll try to get more exact measurements tomorrow when I can get better light on the subject. The J has had some port work on it, so unfortunately I can't compare port size........Jim 

30
I can't tell ant difference

Pages: 1 [2] 3