Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Barry_R

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 133
1
Damn if I didn’t fall into a rabbit hole about piston knurling, after that video.

No "rabbit hole" on piston (or guide) knurling. 
Simple. 
Don't do it.
It reduces the surface of a load bearing area.
Unit pressure will go up and wear rate will be accelerated.

2
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Retirement finalized.
« on: October 14, 2025, 08:04:15 PM »
Good luck and enjoy the time ahead JDC. 
It's been an absolute pleasure meeting with, competing with, and working with you over the years.

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: Lack of oil to rear lifters
« on: September 29, 2025, 09:26:42 AM »
Is it "only" oiling through pushrods - or does it oil through the shafts? 
Most of my T&D bolt on sets, like you have, are shaft oiled.
I have had shaft oiled systems where the mounting fastener locations were off by enough that the shank of the bolt effectively close off the oil feed through the shaft.
Just a light oversize on the shaft's mounting holes and the problem resolved.
Also be aware that T&D is very particular as to adjuster location relative to the rocker arm body.

4
Drag Strip Results for FE Powered Vehicles / Re: 1967 fastback 485
« on: September 08, 2025, 09:16:13 PM »
Congrats on a good weekend

5
FE Technical Forum / Re: Holley 80496-1 carb
« on: August 18, 2025, 06:20:29 AM »
The 950HP was the first Holley in the HP series, and the "950" in the name was not a flow value - but a marketing driven label. 
It was essentially a completely updated race oriented main body with the venturi sizing of a 750 on top of an 850 throttle body - a common race builder combination of the era.

Air flow was - IIRC - somewhere in the 830ish range.  I had a very early - pre-release - one on my car for a while.  The 850 double pumper I had was a hair quicker at the track, but the 950HP was a really nice carb for driving around and cruising - much nicer at part throttle.  I think the original racer target was oval track more so than drag racers.  I do believe that the original design had significant David Braswell input, working with Marvin Benoit who would go on to become one of the founders of Quick Fuel Technology.

6
FE Technical Forum / Re: Dyno Mule question for Mr. Brown
« on: June 12, 2025, 06:47:19 AM »
When doing EMC development I would often try different cams and, with the belt drive, make cam timing changes for each looking for improvements.  Usually the gains at one end of the curve were offset by losses somewhere else - and they were incremental.

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: Mallory distributor gear
« on: May 28, 2025, 09:26:01 PM »
Mallory is/was .500

8
I know of at least a couple BT high riser packages that went over a thousand - the Kuntz engine and the one Thor worked on for Gonia. 
Both of those are a long time ago now, and I am certain that others have gone further - but they are not promoting their results.
I also hold the billet heads to a different standard.

9
FE Technical Forum / Re: valve drop concern
« on: May 16, 2025, 10:29:20 AM »
Factory valves will be completely different material and construction than aftermarket parts.  Only the diameter is the "same".  Don't worry.

10
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Hate to ask a GM question...
« on: May 13, 2025, 10:04:01 PM »
Rod bearing failures are always a treat to get to the bottom of because the failure mode is so rapid and destructive, rarely is there any good evidence left behind to help determine what the problem was or the root cause.  Some of the failure modes that I have seen analyzing warranty engines at work are due to the following.

1.  Contaminated / Dirty / Old / Overheated Oil.  Oil with coolant, fuel, dirt, etc can take out rod bearings quite quickly.  Navistar, Ford (6.OH-No!), and CAT engines from the 2000's and 20-teens that used EGR extensively to meet emissions are particularly prone to this.  EGR cooler develops an internal coolant leak, and all the sudden your engine is trying to lubricate with the green stuff.  I have also seen a bunch of rod bearing failures in air cooled engines due to oil overheating.  When I was at a small engine manufacturer, the life span of the rod bearing was measured in minutes once the oil hit 350 deg. F.

2.  Machining Quality.  Everything from surface finish, journal roundness, corner radius all can affect the lifespan of the rod bearing, and it doesn't take much of a deviation or miss to shorten the life span from 100,000's of miles to 100's of miles.

3.  Engine (casting) Contamination - See recent Toyota Tundra recall

4.  Crankshaft design / flex.  If the crank flexes more than intended or designed, bearing failure can result.  Typically this is more of a main bearing related problem, but it can lead to rod bearing damage as well.  PACCAR 13L engines are known to experience more crank flex than intended and this will lead to failed bearings.

5.  Rod Bolt Quality.  About 3 years ago, we started seeing a dramatic rise in rod bearing failures on Navistar I-Series reman engines.  Turned out, the rod bolt manufacturer (Navistar chosen and vetted supplier) had changed their process and the bolts were softer and did not have the designed tensile strength.  Bolts would stretch and lose clamp load on the cap, and the bearing would spin.  We discovered the problem by doing an extensive statistical study on our DC tool data (torque and angle) from assembly.  The failure rate was only 3 to 5% of engines, so it was difficult to catch, but there was a statistical change in the data.  The bolts were close to being correct (a measured sample would often meet the engineering print and specs), and they would even torque, yield, and stretch properly during assembly, but would fail within 10,000 miles.  We went down a number of rabbit holes before we figured out the root cause on this one.  Navistar ended up recalling all the rod bolts at their dealers and assembly facilities.

6.  Bearing Material or Quality.  Doesn't take much of a change at the supplier to cause problems in the engine.

This would be a good "guess" - the bearing is the "victim" of something else in the system.  Could be damn near anything.  Given the level of electronic management in a new engine package, it could even be something in the software that controls timing and fuel.  A bearing (or rod etc.) design that just meets or barely exceeds design needs won't have enough "headroom" to handle any unexpected loads.

11
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cam shaft spec review
« on: May 02, 2025, 04:27:03 PM »
That cam will sound like a "stock engine" with 462+ cubes, and even with a good combustion chamber it might be fuel sensitive considering the low RPM torque peak (cylinder pressure) and the weight of the vehicle.

12
FE Technical Forum / Re: FERR - Brunson Performance Recap
« on: May 02, 2025, 04:22:51 PM »
Sounds mean. I’m glad you had a good day. And it’s been a while since you have been out right. You must be pretty close to that track right.

Yes, it's been 5 1/2 years. Way too long. The track is just 1:45 from me, compared to 9 hours, so a HUGE savings in fuel.

Was good to see you back out again.  That engine has some years, miles, and passes on it and still running strong.

13
FE Technical Forum / Re: Custom Pistons
« on: April 12, 2025, 07:25:31 AM »
They are "still there"
Part of the Race Winning Brands corporate umbrella, which includes Diamond, Wiseco, Dart, Trend, Manley etc
The entire group has had some significant issues during/post covid - but still stumbling along.

14
Private Classifieds / Re: 496" FE on BAT
« on: March 31, 2025, 03:55:00 PM »
For engines like this, you're basically paying for the name. Gucci gloved Cobra drivers want everything to be Shelby. Not putting down Cobra owners, just the snobby type that want everything associated with Shelby. What seems a bit odd to me about the BAT auction is that you can buy basically the exact same engine from Shelby for $27k.
https://classiccobra.com/Shelby_482CID_575HP

Or the 511" for $29k. No horsepower rating on that one for some reason.
https://classiccobra.com/Shelby_511CID

There are a couple of fairly minor differences, which would account for part of the price difference, but why not go straight to the source? I don't think you have any recourse for issues buying an engine on BAT.

The seller IS Shelby - Dembeste is the company that purchased Shelby a few years ago

No idea why they are trying to sell through BAT without the Shelby name.

15
FE Technical Forum / Re: pre-oiling questions
« on: March 24, 2025, 06:58:55 AM »
I do exactly as you have done - restrictors are a judgement call at preoiling.  Some definitely need it - some don't.  If you follow the tortuous path that FE rockers get oiling through, you'll understand why they can be so variable.  From cam groove to bearing to block, through passages and then alongside a head bolt and and alongside a rocker fastener to the stand, and then up into the shaft.  I have seen some where the machining/assembly tolerance stack up causes the head bolt to block oil.  I have seen the same thing at the cylinder head/rocker fastener and at the rocker fastener to the shaft itself.  You simply need to check and address the problem - if there is one.  Sometimes all you need to do is loosen the rocker assembly and give it a plastic mallet tap at one side or the other to make a significant change.

That 95 psi does seem high - I normally see 70-80 on the drill.  How were the bearing clearances measured?  I'd still probably just let 'er rip with that number cold.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 133