Author Topic: chris401 EXPANDED---more '66 Heads?  (Read 4961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FElony

  • Guest
chris401 EXPANDED---more '66 Heads?
« on: April 25, 2020, 07:05:09 PM »
While doing some research I tripped across a post of yours in the other FE forum that appears to be a 3-month old reply to a very old thread. You asked about the L head casting, yes?

Edit: OK, I guess chris didn't see this or whatever. Has anyone besides me had a hands-on with the C6-L head?
« Last Edit: May 10, 2020, 12:27:26 AM by FElony »

FElony

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2020, 04:23:52 PM »
Replied to put this back on top.

chris401

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2020, 07:17:27 PM »
While doing some research I tripped across a post of yours in the other FE forum that appears to be a 3-month old reply to a very old thread. You asked about the L head casting, yes?

Edit: OK, I guess chris didn't see this or whatever. Has anyone besides me had a hands-on with the C6-L head?
My login saved to my devices no longer works. I may work on getting my password fixed one day. What was the L casting?
Thanks

FElony

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2020, 10:25:09 AM »
While doing some research I tripped across a post of yours in the other FE forum that appears to be a 3-month old reply to a very old thread. You asked about the L head casting, yes?

Edit: OK, I guess chris didn't see this or whatever. Has anyone besides me had a hands-on with the C6-L head?
My login saved to my devices no longer works. I may work on getting my password fixed one day. What was the L casting?
Thanks

The C6EA-L cylinder head, which appears to be the most mysterious of the '66 heads.

FElony

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2020, 09:36:50 PM »
While doing some research I tripped across a post of yours in the other FE forum that appears to be a 3-month old reply to a very old thread. You asked about the L head casting, yes?

Edit: OK, I guess chris didn't see this or whatever. Has anyone besides me had a hands-on with the C6-L head?
My login saved to my devices no longer works. I may work on getting my password fixed one day. What was the L casting?
Thanks

The C6EA-L cylinder head, which appears to be the most mysterious of the '66 heads.

I'm the only one with an L head. I'm special. Special Olympics special.

chris401

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2020, 10:15:16 AM »
One I'll dig up my myth buster photos of the C6TE-G heads on a 66 352 Galaxie. I noticed the wrecked car in 1988 and bought it around 2013(?). Everything I could identify was date matching. Should have kept them just because. 1966 was an odd year for cylinder heads.

TomP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
    • View Profile
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2020, 01:25:38 PM »
I've never seen a C6AE-L, had almost every other FE head. In 66 they made some different stuff for sure. High and low exhaust ports, short and tall intake ports and Thermactor and non-Thermactor. I guess every combination. Are the -L's maybe tall intake ports and low exhaust?

FElony

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2020, 06:37:51 PM »
I've never seen a C6AE-L, had almost every other FE head. In 66 they made some different stuff for sure. High and low exhaust ports, short and tall intake ports and Thermactor and non-Thermactor. I guess every combination. Are the -L's maybe tall intake ports and low exhaust?

OK, here's the story. About 20 years ago, when people were jumping off bridges because the Millenium date/time change was going to freeze up all our technology and kill humanity, I did the logical thing and headed to the junkyard, in this case a one-man, part-time biz. This was around the time the C6-R head was starting to bask in the limelight as a CJ alternative. So I came across a '66 Merc with a dirty 390. Scraping off the driver's head, I saw that it was indeed an R head. Had to have. The owner said a couple hundred for the pair, including his labor to remove! Hey, better him than me.

So I meandered around some more and tripped over a big pile of FE's, mostly 50's and early 60's. Nothing shouted out to me as more than generic, so I continued on and got back to the office. There were both cylinder heads. An R and an L. Yikes! My mistake on not checking the other head, ASSuming it would be the same. Argh. Had the port sizes be the same, I might not have even checked the casting numbers. But side-by-side, the intakes on the R were tall, the L's were short. The exhausts on the R were short, the L's were tall. Somewhere along the line, one head got changed out with a total mismatch. I have no idea which was the original. I laughed over the possibility that Ford might have built this on the assembly line.

Anyway, I paid the man, and left. So now I have one odd R head in the pile of R heads, and this one L piece that nobody has seen. In the old forum, there is an old post from somebody with a pair who wanted to know what he had. True to form, Royce Peterson told him in that he was mistaken, and if he cleaned the heads properly the "L" would prove to be something else. Nope, Royce was wrong, as usual. Had that thread not predated my infamous disruption of the site, I would have chimed in.

You would think that, alphabetically, the L head would still have tall ports like the R, but no. Its scarcity speaks for the probable lack of design integrity, but why it was used at all remains a mystery. There are verified C6-J and C6-U castings out there. There are rumors of C6-A's, but I've never seen anything alphabetically before the J. R castings were supposedly used for x months into the '67 production year, when they were eventually supplanted by the C7-A, a somewhat questionable move. At some point I guess I could see how close the L is to a later head.

So that's it! The L head: Ultra rare and worth $5,000? Or, worth 10 bucks as a wall-mount curiosity. You decide.

thatdarncat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1939
    • View Profile
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2020, 07:41:14 PM »
Just out of curiosity, what is the date code of your C6AE-L head? Does it have a casting plant logo on it ( DIF, CF )?
Kevin Rolph

1967 Cougar Drag Car ( under constuction )
1966 7 litre Galaxie
1966 Country Squire 390
1966 Cyclone GT 390
1968 Torino GT 390
1972 Gran Torino wagon
1978 Lincoln Mk V

FElony

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2020, 07:47:51 PM »
Just out of curiosity, what is the date code of your C6AE-L head? Does it have a casting plant logo on it ( DIF, CF )?

Give me a few days to find it. It's in storage and I haven't looked at it since I got it. Shifting over to sleeping days and awake at nights, so maybe not 125ยบ in that room when I look.

chris401

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2020, 12:09:29 PM »
I've never seen a C6AE-L, had almost every other FE head. In 66 they made some different stuff for sure. High and low exhaust ports, short and tall intake ports and Thermactor and non-Thermactor. I guess every combination. Are the -L's maybe tall intake ports and low exhaust?

OK, here's the story. About 20 years ago, when people were jumping off bridges because the Millenium date/time change was going to freeze up all our technology and kill humanity, I did the logical thing and headed to the junkyard, in this case a one-man, part-time biz. This was around the time the C6-R head was starting to bask in the limelight as a CJ alternative. So I came across a '66 Merc with a dirty 390. Scraping off the driver's head, I saw that it was indeed an R head. Had to have. The owner said a couple hundred for the pair, including his labor to remove! Hey, better him than me.

So I meandered around some more and tripped over a big pile of FE's, mostly 50's and early 60's. Nothing shouted out to me as more than generic, so I continued on and got back to the office. There were both cylinder heads. An R and an L. Yikes! My mistake on not checking the other head, ASSuming it would be the same. Argh. Had the port sizes be the same, I might not have even checked the casting numbers. But side-by-side, the intakes on the R were tall, the L's were short. The exhausts on the R were short, the L's were tall. Somewhere along the line, one head got changed out with a total mismatch. I have no idea which was the original. I laughed over the possibility that Ford might have built this on the assembly line.

Anyway, I paid the man, and left. So now I have one odd R head in the pile of R heads, and this one L piece that nobody has seen. In the old forum, there is an old post from somebody with a pair who wanted to know what he had. True to form, Royce Peterson told him in that he was mistaken, and if he cleaned the heads properly the "L" would prove to be something else. Nope, Royce was wrong, as usual. Had that thread not predated my infamous disruption of the site, I would have chimed in.

You would think that, alphabetically, the L head would still have tall ports like the R, but no. Its scarcity speaks for the probable lack of design integrity, but why it was used at all remains a mystery. There are verified C6-J and C6-U castings out there. There are rumors of C6-A's, but I've never seen anything alphabetically before the J. R castings were supposedly used for x months into the '67 production year, when they were eventually supplanted by the C7-A, a somewhat questionable move. At some point I guess I could see how close the L is to a later head.

So that's it! The L head: Ultra rare and worth $5,000? Or, worth 10 bucks as a wall-mount curiosity. You decide.
So how did that work out when he and Hawkrod disagreed? Never knew what to say when I posted a picture of something and the response was it does not exist. Guess I am not that bright.

FElony

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2020, 01:19:32 PM »
Peterson was a "my way or the highway" person. Myself and others made a hobby out of correcting his declarations, and his usual response was silence. Hawkrod was a weirdo, too, but at least he was in possession of a great variety of parts, so I would be more inclined to believe him in cases like this. I know Royce is still in a couple forums; have no idea what happened to Hawkrod. Last I knew, several years ago, he moved from Apple Valley to Riverside or thereabouts, and dropped off the radar.

Yet another strange bird was Dave Shoe. Often off kilter in his personal life, but his dedication to the FE was admirable. I'd like to see him pop up alive and well.

GJCAT427

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
    • View Profile
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #12 on: May 02, 2020, 05:37:20 AM »
FElony, I got into it with Peterson a couple of times on the Fe forum. He was very arogant as you said and told me I did`nt have a clue about 427s. His dual oiling Cougar 427 was the best block for performance. There was an episode about the side oilers never being installed in Chris crafts and he said I was sadly mistaken, even when confronted with the proof, he told me I didn`t know beans about the 427s. I asked him how many 427s he had seen in his life and he clamed up. Having owned 6 my self and Knowing a couple of guys who had at least 14 between them, I told him he was a rookie at best. I never claimed to know it all and I still learn some thing new about 427s as time goes by.

57 lima bean

  • Guest
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #13 on: May 02, 2020, 08:16:41 AM »
        Ran into Dave Shoe last Fall.Where there's Rockabilly/Surf venues in town,he'll be there.
        Dave may be the kind to "view film" while the rest of us watch movies,I've always enjoyed
        talking with him.

GJCAT427

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
    • View Profile
Re: chris401 REvised --->>> The L head casting
« Reply #14 on: May 02, 2020, 09:03:29 AM »
I remember talking with the Shoe, I even got a set of the 427 blue prints he copied from John V. Mine are still in the shipping tube and I hope to get them framed some day! When Tapa talk took over the FE Forum I lost my password and identity, too bad they lost a lot of the original guys and a lot of info from 20 some yrs.