Author Topic: Crank indexing  (Read 6455 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chad D

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Crank indexing
« on: August 17, 2012, 12:42:56 PM »
With all the attention I see to degree camshafts, does anybody bother indexing the crankshaft?

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7436
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2012, 03:19:11 PM »
Do you mean checking that the throws are 90 degrees apart, or checking that the crank key is in the correct position? 

If you go through the cam degreeing process, and check for TDC on number 1 as the first step, you will automatically phase the cam correctly with the crank, and take out any inaccuracies in the crank key position, timing set, etc.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

Heo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3321
    • View Profile
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2012, 03:31:21 PM »
if you mean straightening and indexgrinding the crankshaft
i allways do it .Keyway indiferance is cured when you degree
tha cam as Jay mentioned



The defenition of a Gentleman, is a man that can play the accordion.But dont do it

Chad D

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2012, 04:00:19 PM »
Do you mean checking that the throws are 90 degrees apart... 

Exactly.

I understand that degreeing the cam phases the cam/crank to the #1 throw.  I rarely ever hear mention of checking crank index, or is this machining error so infrequent or insignificant as to not be worth investigating?

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2012, 04:07:43 PM »
I have never checked one for my own, mostly because I probably dont want to know :)

However, I have had Lunati provide documentation on some BBC cranks proving they were equally indexed across all throws.

It SHOULD certainly matter, 2 degrees makes a difference in intake centerline, what you are essentially doing is the same thing for each throw. 

With that being said, to be a real indexing animal, after ensuring a crank was perfectly "spaced" at each 90, you'd have to go back and check the cam against each opening point to make sure it was ground perfectly too :)
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

Chad D

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2012, 04:16:28 PM »
With that being said, to be a real indexing animal, after ensuring a crank was perfectly "spaced" at each 90, you'd have to go back and check the cam against each opening point to make sure it was ground perfectly too :)

Which was going to be my next question ;-)

Heo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3321
    • View Profile
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2012, 04:28:40 PM »
The biggest variations i have discovered
is on cranks that have been reground
but yes there is some variations on
factory stock crankshafts to
Like my machinist say this engine
had a bad tailor
And yes camshafts have some variations to
before when i was young and ambitious i used
to check all cylinders and yes i found some cams
that was real bad several degres wrong and
different lift....like you say its better to not know.....



The defenition of a Gentleman, is a man that can play the accordion.But dont do it

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3856
    • View Profile
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #7 on: August 20, 2012, 04:39:45 PM »
Indexing is something one can check with the right tool, yet fixing an out-of-index crank as mentioned isn't for the average builder. Very important to check btw on a top runner. Often, cheapo reground cranks suffer from inaccurate machining yet for a grocery getter, it makes little difference.


Having crewed on a supercharged alky dragster and then a supercharged nitro dragster long ago, I found that even big-bucks forged LA Billet, Keith Black and HTC cranks will bends the throws a few degrees, especially when a exhaust rocker breaks and forces a huge spike in pressure in the dropped cylinder. Sad that a pricey $2,000+ crank can be tossed after only a few runs with a bad tuneup! 
Bob Maag

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1928
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2012, 08:08:44 PM »
My crankshaft guy has found variances in both indexing and in stroke variation from throw to throw...

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7436
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2012, 08:51:17 AM »
How much variation has he found, Barry?  Go ahead, scare us   :o
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1928
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2012, 07:14:24 AM »
Would .005 in stoke variation get your attention?
Twice that?

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7436
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Crank indexing
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2012, 09:24:29 AM »
Sheesh, just from a zero deck perspective and a piston to valve clearance perspective that is pretty substantial.  Sounds like it would be worth checking on a max effort build, that's for sure...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC