I am a firm believer that bigger is safer with no downside unless it gets ridiculous
I run .0045 x bore top ring and then round up if required, .0055 x bore for the second ring.
With a 4.08 bore the top ring would be .01835 and I wouldn't think twice about .020
The second ring would be .0225 and I wouldn't lose any sleep at all at .024
IMO the keys to good ring seal are bore condition, both in surface and shape and stability of the ring in the land. Basically if a ring moves a lot, either expanding or contracting to a conical bore or flutter in the land, it's not very happy. The gaps themselves aren't a huge issue unless they are too small
In a dynamic environment, a staggered set of gaps, even when getting larger, do pretty well at holding compression