Author Topic: Steel/steel vs alloy/steel harmonic damper  (Read 3725 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ToddK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
    • View Profile
Steel/steel vs alloy/steel harmonic damper
« on: April 12, 2015, 08:35:14 PM »
I'm looking to buy a new ATI harmonic damper for an engine I am putting together. It is a 496 cube motor that I hope to get about 750hp/7000rpm out of. For my past 2 engines, I have used the ATI part# 918310, which is a steel outer and inner damper. However, I just noticed ATI make a FE damper with an alloy outer shell and steel inner, which is actually cheaper than the steel/steel damper. Any disadvantage to using the alloy/steel damper for my application?

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7436
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Steel/steel vs alloy/steel harmonic damper
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2015, 10:06:26 PM »
What are the weights of the two dampers?  I've been told that a good heavy damper is what you want for a high horsepower engine.  I assume the alloy is aluminum; is that damper much lighter than the other one?
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4474
    • View Profile
Re: Steel/steel vs alloy/steel harmonic damper
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2015, 01:16:16 AM »
Personally, I'd stay with the steel/steel unit. They're better at damping and less prone to heat and durability issues. I think the only reason for an aluminum one is for the guys who want to shave every ounce they can and lessen rotational weight which is probably pretty unrealistic for any gains. A strictly drag engine won't be in the vibration/harmonic cycles for very long, so negative effects are pretty minimal except for shorter life span.

ATI shows the aluminum hub to be a little over 2 1/2lbs lighter.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2015, 01:19:23 AM by cjshaker »
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

ToddK

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
    • View Profile
Re: Steel/steel vs alloy/steel harmonic damper
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2015, 01:20:27 AM »
The ATI catalog shows the aluminium shell damper to be about 1.5lbs lighter, but also lists it as having the same inertia weight as the steel unit. I'll probably just stay with the steel one I have used in the past.

CaptCobrajet

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 683
    • View Profile
Re: Steel/steel vs alloy/steel harmonic damper
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2015, 10:55:56 PM »
The need for "more" damper is most closely related to stroke.  As stroke increases, heavier inertia weights and larger diameters are more desireable.  I use alot of both styles of the ATI dampers.  On some short stroke FEs (like 3.5) we use a smaller diameter, and very light shell...........On long strokers (like 4.4) we use a larger and heavier unit.  I think the ATI's are the best..........JMO.  They have alot more options than what is listed in the catalog.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2015, 10:58:48 PM by CaptCobrajet »
Blair Patrick

Yellow Truck

  • Guest
Re: Steel/steel vs alloy/steel harmonic damper
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2015, 05:29:46 PM »
They ran aluminum hubs with iron alloy inertial rings on the GT40s. Probably good enough for the street.