Time and again HRM proves it's bias against Ford. For the last 5-6 years [or more] HRM features very few Fords or Ford specific articles but Chevy, Mopar are well represented in both features and technical articles. Count how many Camaros are on the cover and let them tell us that Fords are well represented, how many "How to make XXX horsepower with the LS engine" has been printed? We've had the LS engine shoved up our asses for years...HRM is a joke, a bad joke at that. HRM and NHRA must use the same playbook, I've never seen a more brand specific bias against Ford as I've seen over the years in NHRA, To prove my point why did NHRA ban the 385 series engine in T/F, fuel/funnycar, and in the Alcohol classes? They simply changed the rules that no engine with a bore center more that 4.84" can compete. Is it just a co-incidence that the 4.84" B/C is a BBC specific size? All of Walt Austin's work with the Boss 429 Hemi was wasted as he found a few things with the B-429 that were superior to the 426 style Mopar, like stronger cylinders due to a bigger bore center, better breathing heads, higher cam tunnel for bigger cam lobes, better rocker ratios, smaller combustion chambers for a given C/R so a lighter piston could be used. A stronger crank by design with the 3.00" main journals and greater journal overlap for the rod journals. Their bias is so blatant and extreme I'm surprised that any engine painted blue would be kicked out of an event.