Author Topic: TKO VS T56?  (Read 24167 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BigNate

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
    • View Profile
Re: TKO VS T56?
« Reply #45 on: July 10, 2014, 02:08:21 PM »
Can't really see the need for a T56 other than ultimate strength if you're going big power.  .50 gear is going to only pull 1700rpm running 70mph even with a 4.11, most any hotrod engine is going to be cammed where that is not really a good RPM to pull that much load. 

For me - the appeal of the .50 is exactly that.  Being able to run at less than 2000 rpm, over 70 mph.  It is a pure "loaf along the freeway" gear...  The intent is not to "pull hard through 6th" - and I suspect that just about anyone who would be looking at doing so would be is such rare air power wise (thinking about the hard core Bonneville or Texas Mile crowd)  that the T-56 would not be in the running as a race trans. 

As to the cam bit... not all "hot-rodders" make power with huge compression and 300 degrees of duration...  turbo's don't want need a bunch of cam...    ;)

Just my 2 cents...

EDIT - When I read the cam sentence above I realized that it might come across as a bit snarky.  No offense intended - just noting that I'm not worried about having the necessary torque / engine manners at 1700 to maintain cruising speed... :-)

I fixed it for you.  Turbos like big cams... just with lots of lobe separation.

http://www.prolineracing.net/classifieds/blog

I promise all these cars have HUGE cams in them.

:-)  Remember the video of Dan Millen driving his outlaw car a couple of miles down the road through the burger king drive through for lunch? 

Even at that level the power-plant is more well mannered that a comparable motor that gets to the same HP with compression ratio, related overlap and perhaps a whole bunch of laughing gas.   :-)  Just sayin...

 (sorry for tangenting the thread a bit...  let me know if you want me to kill the post...) 
Arrrrg.... LOL  My sig line everywhere else is somewhat political... Will that get me kicked?

fe66comet

  • Guest
Re: TKO VS T56?
« Reply #46 on: July 10, 2014, 02:29:42 PM »
Several companies offer shift upgrades for the TKO, I am thinking of doing an upgraded front throw out housing, upgraded syncros, surface treatment and shifter upgrades.

fe66comet

  • Guest
Re: TKO VS T56?
« Reply #47 on: July 10, 2014, 02:32:28 PM »
Works for me Nate LOL.

cobracammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1173
    • View Profile
Re: TKO VS T56?
« Reply #48 on: July 10, 2014, 03:28:03 PM »
I actually looked back through my correspondence, and the reason you would need an input shaft altered would be only if you plan to use the T56-XL with a ford FE.  The "regular" T56 works without modification, but I needed a T56XL due to its stock shifter location in the Mustang.   Wanted to clarify.   ::)
Jason
2005 Saleen S281 (427 SOHC 2 X 4 EFI swap), T56 Magnum XL 6 speed, 9" Currie rear with 3.89 Gears

bn69stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
    • View Profile
Re: TKO VS T56?
« Reply #49 on: July 10, 2014, 09:02:58 PM »
I am running a cam that to me is not that radical at all ,  232-240 @.50  .559/.563 on a 112 lobe so its power brake friendly  http://fepower.net/simplemachinesforum/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif ..Bud
69 mach 1 , 428 C J  Blue Oval Performance BBM heads -T@D rocker s- Blue thunder intake - Comp hydr roller - MSD ignition - FPA headers- Holley 850 hp double pumper - TKO 600 - 9 inch 3.89 Detroit Locker . ride tech coil over conversion - power rack @ pinoin steering - 13 inch drilled @ slotted 4 wheel disc brakes ..

fe66comet

  • Guest
Re: TKO VS T56?
« Reply #50 on: July 10, 2014, 11:33:55 PM »
If you have room it is a good choice for sure. I do not have the space for it plus the the extra weight is a issue also. I am putting my project on the slimfast plan LOL.