Author Topic: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?  (Read 18848 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jim Kramer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 49
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #30 on: January 18, 2026, 10:38:21 AM »
Sorry for the thread drift   but wasn't the story that someone had managed to purchase a bunch of late production side oiler rejects that were supposed to be destroyed and they had surfaced several years ago up for sale?          Jim Kramer

Matthias390

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #31 on: January 25, 2026, 06:42:37 AM »
have you looked on ebay uk? there's often fe's for sale, there's a 390 in bits now for under £1000. oh, and a 360 block is the same as a 390 block just with a 352 crank'.
neil.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_fsrp=1&rt=nc&_from=R40&_nkw=ford+fe+v8&_sacat=6030&LH_ItemCondition=7000%7C3000

Thanks a lot for that tip. I did not. Will do now :-)
That engine you mentioned is already 40 thousands over. I need a standard bore 360/390, that I can have bored to match my brandnew pistons/rings.

Matthias390

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #32 on: February 12, 2026, 11:16:58 AM »
Found a block only 120 miles away from home.
Standard bore size 4.05".

My machine guy borrowed me his sonic tester, so I took it with me to check the block out. Measured all the cylinders, 12 spots each.
One spot, pointing toward the front of the block, is 0.08", all the other measurements turned out to be 0.14" to 0.24".
Am pleased with that.

Unfortunately, although the guy I bought it from, is the owner of an engine machine shop, too, he did not have a straight edge. So I could not check the alignment of the main bearings.

But, very pleasantly, although the block looks like oil changes weren't on the regular menu, all the water jackets look almost new. Mister no-oilchange must have at least used proper coolant.


cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4559
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #33 on: February 12, 2026, 03:26:47 PM »
But, very pleasantly, although the block looks like oil changes weren't on the regular menu, all the water jackets look almost new. Mister no-oilchange must have at least used proper coolant.

To me, that is a good sign. That means the engine likely hasn't been rebuilt and cut on. That means you're starting with fresh factory surfaces to clean up and likely in stock specs. That's a good thing...usually.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

Matthias390

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #34 on: February 13, 2026, 07:11:02 AM »
Also, I have foumd a rather large "X" casting mark driver side, close to the transmission flange.
In the lifter vallye D3TE ist cast in and beneath the oil filter flange A426
So a 73 casting design, cast on the 26th of April 1974.

The main bearing supports have an additional rib, compared to my other FE block.

Can you guys tell me what this X and the extra ribs are about?

Matthias390

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #35 on: March 01, 2026, 02:30:24 AM »
Well, that joy of having found a replacement block was short lived.
"New" block is cracked......

How do you guys judge this? Fixable with laser welding?

GerryP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #36 on: March 01, 2026, 07:26:32 AM »
You could do a hard fill on the block.  You could use a ceramic sealer on the water jacket.  Or you could stitch seam the crack.  I'd probably do the ceramic seal as my first choice, with stitch the block as my second.  The hard fill has some cooling considerations where the other two don't.

That's really not that bad.  If it's not cracked in the crank saddles, you are usually able to repair the block.  Lastly, don't trust your eyes.  Get the block Magnafluxed.  There could be other cracks hiding that you can't see.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2026, 10:48:55 AM by GerryP »

Stangman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1881
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #37 on: March 01, 2026, 10:34:21 AM »
I don’t know maybe just me but a crack is a no go for me. I know your having a hard time finding a good block but spending money on a cracked block especially an FE which isn’t cheap just doesn’t make sense. It’s not like your doing a numbers matching restoration that that block has to be used.

CDXXVII

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #38 on: March 01, 2026, 12:35:55 PM »
Get the block Magnafluxed.  There could be other cracks hiding that you can't see.

Isn't that the mag particle tool I can see in the pictures?

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #39 on: March 01, 2026, 04:24:34 PM »
Did you ever go back and recheck your old block?
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

67xr7cat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #40 on: March 10, 2026, 09:21:11 AM »
The BB Mopar guys would just drill the end of that crack and JB weld it...  I'd recommend cleaning the block and doing a complete mag and pressure test.  If that is the only crack best way to fix it would be with lock-n-stitch.  As for what block you have sounds like it is from the MCC foundry.  They only made 360/390 blocks and all came with the crows foot main webbing.  Easy way to ID them is they have a mirror 105 where the DIF blocks have a 352.  Decent block, but some had problems with the oil feed to the heads cracking.  If you find that you can just sleeve the feed hole.

Edit: looking at your picture of the block I can see the 105.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2026, 09:23:05 AM by 67xr7cat »

Rory428

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1139
    • View Profile
Re: 0.016 cylinder wall thickness - Will sleeving save it?
« Reply #41 on: March 10, 2026, 07:41:47 PM »
As mentioned, every "105" 360/390 block that I have seen has the extra main webbing. The cracked block, assuming the outer water jacket is the only cracked area, is routinely repaired with the Lock N Stitch, pretty common stuff at machine shops. That said, if it was a 427 or 428 block, it may be worth the expense, but for a 390 block, personally I would look for another block. I understand that FEs are rather scarce in Europe, so that could be a factor.  It may be a coincidence, but the few times that I have had a FE block that put oil into the cooling system via the passage inside the bolt, has been on a 105 block.
1978 Fairmont,FE 427 with 428 crank, 4 speed Jerico best of 9.972@132.54MPH 1.29 60 foot
1985 Mustang HB 331 SB Ford, 4 speed Jerico, best of 10.29@128 MPH 1.40 60 foot.
1974 F350 race car hauler 390 NP435 4 speed
1959 Ford Meteor 2 dr sedan. 428 Cobra Jet, 4 speed Toploader. 12.54@ 108 MPH