An expensive and complicated (but pretty) solution - looking to fix a nonexistent problem.
+1 on that. In fact, on all but one of the SOHCs that I have tested, the chain stretch will retard both cams a few degrees at high RPM (one engine saw the left cam advance a couple degrees while the right cam retarded, but that's another story). So around 4000 RPM you can get the benefits of advanced cam timing, but by 7000 RPM the cam timing retards a few degrees, which is what the engine wants to make a little more power. It's like variable cam timing on a modern engine, but just using the stock SOHC configuration. It is an advantage over a gear drive.
Back in the 1960s Sneaky Pete Robinson ran a gear drive on his SOHC dragster, but the way he did it turned the two cams in opposite directions. This solved the problem of the differences in geometry between the valve train action between the left and right cams, so he could run aftermarket grinds (which were the same lobe on both cams) without any loss of power due to different valve train geometries on the left and right side. Nowadays, thanks to work that Barry and I did with Billy Godbold at Comp Cams, you can get cam grinds that have slightly different lobes on the left and right sides to compensate for the left to right geometry issues, just like Ford did with their original SOHC cams. As a result, from my perspective anyway there is no reason to use a gear drive to run the cams on the SOHC.