Author Topic: wow 722 hp "flathead"  (Read 1135 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pbf777

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2023, 10:20:17 AM »
     The old Flathead is still quite popular, perhaps actually having become more so in the past decade or so; this as the Hot-Rod crowd is in many camps moving away from the old 350/350 standby, looking for something more dynamic to park under the hood.   ;)

     And along those lines we currently are working on a Ford 337 (big-boy) Flathead which will blown for his application.   8)

     Scott.

shady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1003
    • View Profile
Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2023, 10:30:02 AM »
I was so impressed when somebody crossed the 400hp line with the Y block years ago. This is incredable.
What goes fast doesn't go fast long'
What goes fast takes your money with it.
So I'm slow & broke, what went wrong?
2021 FERR cool FE Winner
2022 FERR cool FE Winner
2023 FERR cool FE Winner

pbf777

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« Reply #17 on: September 26, 2023, 10:42:37 AM »
     Though it is true, that at some point, particularly with the "old stuff", one has to realize that to make it go faster............you just drive downhill!   ::)

     Scott.

Joe-JDC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1490
  • Truth stands on its own merit.
    • View Profile
Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« Reply #18 on: September 26, 2023, 08:37:10 PM »
Well, I don't know about going down hill, but I have a 292/375Y Block that has made 613.3hp/546lbft, and I hope there is a bit more in it before I quit with the testing.  My little 292/303Y made 463hp after the 2019 EMC, so there is still hope for those of us who still like working on these antique engines including the FE.  Joe-JDC
Joe-JDC '70GT-500

Royce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
    • View Profile
Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« Reply #19 on: September 26, 2023, 08:43:47 PM »
Joe, have you ever flowed an Ardun head?
1955 Thunderbird Competition Coupe Altered Chassis "War Bird" 383 Lincoln Y block 520 hp
1955 Thunderbird 292 275 hp Y Block
1956 Ford Victoria 292 Y block

1957 Mercury 2dr Wagon "Battle Wagon" drag car 
1957 Thunderbird Glass body Tube Chassis drag car 333 cu in 500 hp Ford Y block
1961 Starliner 390/375 clone
1965 GT40 tribute w/FE
1966 Falcon Pro Touring project
Kaase Boss 547. 840 HP 698 Torque  pump gas
1992 BMW V-12 5.0
2001 Lincoln 5.4 4 cam.
1968 Cougar XR7

pbf777

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« Reply #20 on: September 27, 2023, 12:26:45 PM »
Well, I don't know about going down hill,............... so there is still hope for those of us who still like working on these antique engines including the FE. .

     Maybe (?) you misunderstood my perspective in my statement, but to clarify, I'm definitely one of those whom enjoy working on the "old-stuff", including the challenge of proving to doubters that some of the antiquated examples can be made surprisingly capable today.   

     But, there is also the fact that in being realistic, one is generally going to have to work a wee bit harder on the "old-stuff",  and the limits will often be found sooner, this as compared to much of the more modern engineering examples.  Don't you agree?     :)

     Scott.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2023, 12:29:50 PM by pbf777 »

bsprowl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
    • Ford FE Information
Re: wow 722 hp "flathead"
« Reply #21 on: September 27, 2023, 09:23:38 PM »
My Dad was a welder for the Navy in WWII and worked on nuclear submarines in the ’60s and into the mid ‘70s.  He once told me that metallurgy changed a lot during WWII and changed a lot more in the late ’60 and early ‘70s.  Machine tools that were calibrated in thousandths became calibrated in 10 thousandths.  Straight 8 engines would sag in the middle if not supported properly; the cast iron blocks were that weak.  Small changes in the metals made machining with great accuracy possible.  They could measure in ten thousandths but the metals couldn’t be worked reliably from batch to batch.  He said the quality of the metals was so much better when he retired than when it was when he started.