Author Topic: BBM head info  (Read 18208 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4822
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #75 on: August 06, 2021, 11:30:08 AM »
Nevermind.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2021, 05:16:24 PM by blykins »
Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

WerbyFord

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #76 on: August 06, 2021, 11:39:47 AM »
Well after reading these posts I guess I will wait for the new head designs to come out [as if I have a choice]. I hope the come out before I kick off.
I am interested in Blairs post on the noisy flow in the heads at lift.
I am not a head man and really don't understand what it means, I assume it means that the flow is interupted and bouncing back and slowing the flow?
Cost is a factor in what I buy.
I am 100% disabled and on a fixed income so I have to get the most from my dollars.
The car I am building is not a all out race engine but just something to have some fun in so I don't have to have the latest and most HP in my engine. I am shooting for an honest 425 HP.
Greg
 

Blair -
I too very much appreciate when you DO have the time to post.
Very much looking forward to the Dueling 390s again.
If the factory iron heads can be CNC'd that good they will be a big hit. A lot of cars will want that F.A.S.T. look of factory iron parts for original appearance.

Greg -
LOL per what I've Gonkulated so far, you could shove a little Comp 270S in there with ANY of those heads, BBM, TFS_CNC, or BBM_CNC, and hit 425hp even on CNG. The 11.4 CR, which from what I've read the CNG should tolerate just fine, helps, even though CNG hurts the volumetric efficiency. The giant C8AX-D cam should make more than that but will be very hard to live with and keep clean.

gregaba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #77 on: August 06, 2021, 12:02:00 PM »
Werbyford
For what i plan to do with the car I can live with the D cam good. This build started out being a stock build for a everyday driver but I just don't need another driver.
I have my 2013 F250 and a 19 Fusion and my 71 Ranchero 429 CJ for that all that though I completly changed the suspension on the Ranchero to drive road races when I can.
More then likely the 63 won't see 2000 miles a year.
I had my 13 Boss 302 for 5 years and only put 23,000 miles on it.
The longest trip I will take with the 63 will be a 180 mile round trip when I go to the drag strip a few times a year.
It will just be a fun car and I was hoping for an honest 425 HP at the rear wheels.
I hope I can hit that mark as my Boss had 444 HP and it was a rocket.
The only things I am waiting on to get it running are the heads and driveshaft as I have everything else.
When I get it running I will pull it in the shop and paint it.
I am only going to run the D cam for 6 months [for old times sake] and then will switch to a custom solid roller.
Greg

67xr7cat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #78 on: August 09, 2021, 10:27:16 PM »
N/M
« Last Edit: September 01, 2021, 08:19:30 PM by 67xr7cat »

67xr7cat

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #79 on: August 09, 2021, 10:38:13 PM »
Have to say this is a good thread. One can take a lot of information away. I recently came across a thread on speedtalk that found interesting.  The linked video in the thread was to a dyno test on three different engines where on each engine they tried three different heads.  Idea was to see the effect of port volume change, but the heads had a lot more than just change of port volume.  Valve sizes, cfm, etc... all changed too. So basically kinda says what one can expect by putting a different head on.  Now some argue that the engines would have done better of optimized for some of the heads and is true, but if you look at the video you can learn a lot about how a perceived better head may not be all you think it should be or how a bigger head is not always worse. 

https://www.speed-talk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=62222

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZSQ5Kd ... e=youtu.be

WerbyFord

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #80 on: August 09, 2021, 11:51:55 PM »
Well here goes, I hope this post is a little bit fun.

These are all on GASOLINE, D-cam, car per your specs with the fancy transmission.

This seemed like a good time for yet another “Dueling Gonkulator” for cylinder heads.
Probably not as definitive as a dyno & timeslip series, but also slightly less costly.
I Gonkulated everything from the C7AE-A “Tiny Port” iron to Blair’s Pro Ports, as best I have info on all of them. The difference between heads (133 Ponies, 1.5 sec, and 15mph) is striking, and yet, it makes you realize that comparing BBM_CNC vs TFS_CNC is really a nit-pick – other considerations (cost, reliability, availability, compatibility) are bigger factors.


Starting with TFS heads, I took a look at what converters do in your 6r80 Gal. I’m not too familiar with that transmission, pretty fancy stuff.
Et   mph   60m   stall
12.16   120.33   4.3   1800
12.07   120.36   4.2   2000
11.95   120.41   4.1   2400
Not a huge effect of stall, so I’d try whatever’s in there. 1st gear is so steep – steeper than the old GM Hydramatic of the 1950s, so it doesn’t really mind the cam.
So I’ll Gonkulate with 1800 stall just in case it’s that low. Here are how all the heads compare.
I’m running all these with cutouts open, because, it sounds better and how else would you run the D-Cam?
I hope your track “allows” real sound – some of the wimpier tracks don’t like open headers any more unless there’s big money on the table.

I used total Wt=3750 for iron, Wt=3700 for aluminum with driver & tools. In all cases the CR is magically set to CR=11.4 which would of course require different pistons in many cases. All these heads are using the TFS Cleveland intake with adapter. For the MR, HR and TP heads it’s not even clear those would work that way or even work on a 428, but the magic of the Gonkulator allows us to try it just to compare the heads to each other.
In each case, I’m shifting the Gonkulator 400rpm above peak power.

Basically there’s 4 batches of heads.
Within a batch, they’re very nearly the same and nearly within the +/- 3% of the Gonkulator:
1960s grocery-store iron
1960s Hi-Po iron
1990s aluminum
2010s Hi-Po aluminum
I list the heads in order of “Ponies” (average of peak TQ & peak HP), the best street/strip metric I know of:
ET   MPH   60ft   60m      R   TQ   R   HP   Ponies   Head
13.55   106.5   2.25   5.4      45   432   62   425   429   C7AE-A
13.54   106.7   2.26   5.4      45   431   62   427   429   C8AE-H
13.39   108.3   2.25   5.3      46   446   62   442   444   C4AE-G
   
12.98   112.0   2.19   4.9      46   482   63   504   480   C8OE-N
12.82   113.9   2.20   4.9      46   485   64   517   500    C5AF-F MR-F ***
12.73   114.6   2.18   4.8      46   496   65   528   512    C7OE-K TP   ***
12.67   115.2   2.16   4.7      46   503   64   529   516   C4AF-F HR   ***
   
12.61   115.7   2.16   4.7      47   499   65   538   518   Ed Out-of-Box
12.55   116.4   2.15   4.6      47   506   65   545   525   Ed Stage X
   
12.32   118.5   2.10   4.4      47   530   65   571   550   Survival Felony      
12.22   119.5   2.08   4.4      47   541   65   582   561   BBM      438 RWHP
12.22   119.6   2.09   4.4      47   542   67   592   567   Felony CNC
12.22   119.6   2.10   4.4      47   539   68   599   568   Ed Stg III
12.16   120.3   2.08   4.2      46   550   66   595   572   TFS_CNC   
12.16   120.3   2.08   4.3      46   549   67   599   573   BBM_CNC
12.09   121.0   2.07   4.3      47   555   67   610   582   Blair Pro Port

*** The astute reader will notice that it would be hard to run eg TP heads without a TP intake, and even hard to run them on a 428. The exhausts are either hitting the wall or very close to it. But let’s pretend – and in doing so, we can see that the TP heads and the old base Edel heads are just about equal. The Edel heads were a good start to the new era back in 1997 when they came out. But they’re outclassed today by everything that came after them.

By the way, the aluminum heads here do indeed come in well above that 425 REAR WHEEL hp, though you still lose a lot on the way from the old 1960s gross HP to rear wheel on a typical race day.

Hope this helps on your 63 Gal project, and hope it helps everyone look forward to the Dueling 390s this fall. That will be better than Football! Well, Werby’s Wife disagrees but I think so.

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4822
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #81 on: August 10, 2021, 04:38:21 AM »
n/m
« Last Edit: August 16, 2021, 05:16:51 PM by blykins »
Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

Gregwill16

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #82 on: August 10, 2021, 07:27:37 AM »
Wow, thanks for taking the time to put all that together Werby! If you remove all bias and look at it objectively, comparing heads out of the box, the TFS are very hard to beat. It appears you have to spend close to another grand + on other offerings, to compete with the TFS heads. One of the few negatives was the stand pads. But if you need rockerstands anyhow, Brent working with Precision on a shorter stand, has eliminated that additional cost and the extra thread engagement is a good thing. The smaller chamber may come into play some, but otherwise an easy choice.

Albarnett99

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #83 on: August 10, 2021, 09:04:32 AM »
Great post!  A big thank you to Blair, Brent and everyone else for their comments and experiences.  It's great that we have so many choices for our FEs!

Each build can have its unique needs and characteristics.  It helps to have so many options to choose from.  Case in point, my 445 mill has flat top pistons and I seriously doubt I can achieve an acceptable compression ratio for pump gas with the TFS option.  As such, I am willing to spend more to get a BBM alternative to my Stage X heads that gets me back into my current compression ratio range without a bunch of changes to quench and everything else.

I have personally spoken to Blair and Brent multiple times and have learned a ton from these guys.  I appreciate all their time, advise, and knowledge.  I also agree that flow numbers aren't the end-all-be-all.  These guys provide real A/B testing data to help us select what's best for our intended goals.

I think we should all celebrate these engine builders who take time out from their very busy schedules to share their knowledge and experiences with us!

gregaba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 933
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #84 on: August 10, 2021, 11:32:43 AM »
Werby ford
Thanks very much for taking the time to do this. It is an eye opener.
I thought that the aluminum head was basicly just a litter better then stock head with the benifit being in the weight saving's.
Guess I was wrong but then again I am not to bright.
I really like that you used average HP and Torque. I like a good even torque curve in the whole whole power band over peak HP but it is all ways nice to have a high Peak number.
One reason I decided on the 6R80 is the factory buildt in trans break as I think that will be a lot of fun and it only cost $100.00 to add to the tranny ecm.
I really don't feel so bad now for getting rid of all my old heads this year. I had never seen a comparison between the old and new heads and wasn't sure about the differences between them.
 No problem with the track as it is 10 miles from any town and open headers are no problem.
I will be running 4.44 gears and a 2800 to 3000 stall TQ.
I plan on taking some more weight out of the front end with tube a arms and coilovers to make up for the weight I will be adding to the trunk with the CNG tanks.
Since this is a fun can it will not have AC or heat or any power steering but will be running a hydra boost  disc breaks.
Again thanks
Greg
 
 

mbrunson427

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #85 on: August 10, 2021, 11:43:53 AM »
Werby, I'm sure you have explained this before somewhere else on the forum, but can you explain super quick how the gonkulator predicts power output? Do you enter strictly just flow data? Or do you enter a ton of engine combinations to give the computer data points to pull from? Just wondering how the brains of the thing work.
Mike Brunson
BrunsonPerformance.com

WerbyFord

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #86 on: August 10, 2021, 12:20:48 PM »
Werby, I'm sure you have explained this before somewhere else on the forum, but can you explain super quick how the gonkulator predicts power output? Do you enter strictly just flow data? Or do you enter a ton of engine combinations to give the computer data points to pull from? Just wondering how the brains of the thing work.

Well there's a LOT. Flow sure, but then areas, volumes, heights etc where known, intake planes, lifter types, rocker ratio, header & exhaust dimensions.
Chamber and piston shape relate to burn, in sometimes empirical ways. Not always related to either flow or volume. Quench, compression & CID obviously, etc. Then there's some empirical stuff, like when IIRC I Gonkulated one of Blair's 1st Engine Masters or Super Stock engines & the Gonk was low by 50 ponies or something - LOTS of little things done in the build. I doubt even an OEM computer could model all that (eg what does a windage tray or pan evac do?), let alone the budget and years of validation it would take. You'd have to convince the Government it was related to Climate Change and then they'd give you a $100,000,000 grant to study it.

And then there's the car. For example the ET_MPH above seems a little slow, but those are just a street car with cutouts. About half the timeslip is the engine, the other half is the car (& driver, especially if a stick car but even leaving with an automatic is tricky).

A lot of the above is theory, some of it empirical. And the Gonkulator has to line up with over 2000 dyno tests & IIRC almost as many timeslips or it doesnst mean much. I've been developing & using it for over 30 years. Fun and a lot cheaper to sort out combos, at least to get a starting point.
Some stuff like spacers, sometimes collector extensions etc, it's easier to just try it.

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4822
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #87 on: August 10, 2021, 12:31:09 PM »
n/m
« Last Edit: August 16, 2021, 05:17:17 PM by blykins »
Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

frnkeore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #88 on: August 10, 2021, 01:23:16 PM »
Actually, I don't see using results from multiple dynos, as a bad thing for a sim, it would tend to give a good average of what might be expected, since most people don't dyno their engines.

For a engine builder, is is important. They need to know what's going on and if something is a improvement or not, in any particular build.
Frank

Dumpling

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
    • View Profile
Re: BBM head info
« Reply #89 on: August 10, 2021, 01:35:45 PM »
I'm really far down the tail of the bell curve of everyone else who posts here, but I'd like to know if a 406, currently with out-of-the-box Edelbrock heads, would benefit from a different set of heads? Especially if the goal was (!!horrors!!) pump gas (87 octane, 15% ethanol), power brakes, hydraulic cam with FPA headers. I know, how did I get in the door!?