Author Topic: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?  (Read 5507 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cheeser

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« on: April 30, 2021, 09:01:50 PM »
I’m thinking of having the 390 in my 68 Cougar rebuilt in a few years with a stroker kit and Trick Flow heads, but keeping the 428CJ exhaust manifolds (installed by original owner) for appearance and clearance.

I’m curious what type of a power hit I would see using the CJ exhaust vs installing headers.

I understand the need for headers to make max power, but headers in these cars seems to be a pain.  I live in Denver and already see a performance hit due to altitude, but my goal would be around 425hp, but more wouldn’t hurt.

Just exploring options for now, before getting serious in a few years.
Jeff
1968 Cougar XR-7, X-code 390, C6

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7564
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2021, 10:00:04 PM »
On the 390 stroker engine chronicled in my book, the different headers I tested ran from 485HP to 500HP.  The same engine with the 428CJ manifolds was just shy of 460 HP.  So I think you could probably figure on a 30-40 HP loss if you stuck with the CJ manifolds.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

1968galaxie

  • Guest
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2021, 10:42:41 PM »
Sounds like a cool project.
You may want to contact Brent Lykins here regarding a custom camshaft for that particular application.
I am sure he has a few ideas regarding camshaft duration split when using CJ exhaust manifolds.
My initial thoughts would be more of a duration split as well as opening the exhaust valve a little earlier.
Perhaps Brent will chime in.

Cheers

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1984
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2021, 06:56:49 AM »
Recently dyne's one similar.  I can verify that +/-30-40 HP loss with the manifolds.  We have done several strokers with manifolds for folks looking for the power and torque gains while retaining that concourse cosmetic appearance.

aj

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2021, 08:18:20 AM »
One way of looking at it is:  To gain 30-40 hp out of a 390,  a guy can add 55 cubic inches OR add nice set of headers.   
Adrian Jacobs
Weatherford, TX
1970 Shelby GT500 
1970 Boss 302

GerryP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2021, 09:30:40 AM »
I removed the Hooker Super Comps from my Fairlane and put CJ manifolds on it.  Yes, I know the manifolds will be down on power.  But I'm not class racing the car, so the simplicity of the manifolds overrode the power difference.  It still will flywheel the tires, so it appears I'm making enough power to get some tickets.

cheeser

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2021, 02:34:00 PM »
So I haven’t heard anyone saying I’m nuts so far :-).  With the stroker kits and nice heads out there now, I assumed decent power could be obtained, while keeping an outwardly stockish appearance.

My last adventure with an FE engine was in High School in the 80.  I had a 64 Galaxy with 4 spd and blown 390.  I found a wrecked 62 Galaxie with a freshened 406 tripower.  My auto shop teacher let me transplant the 406 into my 64...had a lot of fun, but it rusted out being WI and I left to join the military.  I sold the motor about 15 years ago as I thought I’d never have another FE, but here I am again.  I had a blown Coyote in my 13 Mustang w 609 hp for a few years...extremely fun and smooth, but sold it for the Cougar.

The existing 390 runs decent now, but it has the stock 2 barrel.  Until I can convince the spouse on this, I was going to put a Blue Thunder 427MR intake on and 4 barrel in the interim...later this summer once I work the rest of the Cougar gremlins out.

I have been watching Barry and Lykins, and this forum just to see what is out there.  I am not aware of any knowledgeable FE builders in the Denver area, thus another reason for me to stalk this forum.
Jeff
1968 Cougar XR-7, X-code 390, C6

plovett

  • Guest
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2021, 03:08:29 PM »
Is there any practical, economical, and worthwhile porting process that can be applied to factory iron exhaust manifolds?  Sand blasting?  Acid porting?   I understand Extrude Honing is very expensive for very small gains.

paul

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4537
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2021, 06:39:46 PM »
There are a number of 'shorty' tube headers that are being produced for the FE now. Since you're not in a big hurry, it may be worth some time researching to find out if any of them fit the Mustang/Cougar engine bay. I'd imagine that a shorty would cut that HP loss in half and still be easy to install without most of the interference issues associated with long tube headers.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

Skeeter65

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 80
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2021, 08:32:26 PM »
Doesn’t Sanderson make shorty headers for the FE that will fit the Mustang and Cougar? The build from the OP sounds a lot like what I’m doing with mine but it’s going in my ‘67 S Code Mustang coupe.

cheeser

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2021, 09:35:28 PM »
There are a number of 'shorty' tube headers that are being produced for the FE now. Since you're not in a big hurry, it may be worth some time researching to find out if any of them fit the Mustang/Cougar engine bay. I'd imagine that a shorty would cut that HP loss in half and still be easy to install without most of the interference issues associated with long tube headers.

I actually thought about “shorty” headers over the winter, but didn’t find anything for my application in a Cougar.

I considered custom, but assumed prices escalate fairly fast.  I don’t mind somewhat of a premium if they were available though. 

I currently have a very slight exhaust leak at the manifold as it appears the shop used a gasket when it was rebuilt back in 2008, and the CJ manifolds were installed. I’m probably going to have to address that at some point...not looking forward to it as I don’t have a lift.
Jeff
1968 Cougar XR-7, X-code 390, C6

turbohunter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2515
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2021, 09:48:09 PM »
Just a quick word on the Sanderson shorties.
I have a set that came on my wagon. By far the biggest piles I’ve ever had. I have had them off my wagon at least five times to weld them up. I’ve reflattened the flange twice and welded up many cracks. It’s like they used sub par metal that crystallized when they welded them originally.
There is one leak in the middle of the collector I can’t get a torch on. Tick tick tick when I lay on it.
They are horrible.
Why haven’t I replaced them yet? Waiting for new heads and just trying to get by.
Your experience my vary but beware. I don’t like being negative but these deserve it.
Marc
'61 F100 292Y
'66 Mustang Injected 428
'66 Q code Country Squire wagon


70bosscat

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #12 on: May 02, 2021, 10:23:05 AM »
FPA tri-y perhaps?

Cyclone03

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #13 on: May 02, 2021, 12:02:30 PM »
Just a quick word on the Sanderson shorties.
I have a set that came on my wagon. By far the biggest piles I’ve ever had. I have had them off my wagon at least five times to weld them up. I’ve reflattened the flange twice and welded up many cracks. It’s like they used sub par metal that crystallized when they welded them originally.
There is one leak in the middle of the collector I can’t get a torch on. Tick tick tick when I lay on it.
They are horrible.
Why haven’t I replaced them yet? Waiting for new heads and just trying to get by.
Your experience my vary but beware. I don’t like being negative but these deserve it.


If your headers are stainless and your putting a torch to them they will crack.
Lance H

turbohunter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2515
    • View Profile
Re: Stroker 445 with 428CJ exhaust - worthwhile?
« Reply #14 on: May 02, 2021, 02:03:53 PM »
Not stainless

By “torch” I meant a mig or tig gun/torch.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2021, 02:08:37 PM by turbohunter »
Marc
'61 F100 292Y
'66 Mustang Injected 428
'66 Q code Country Squire wagon