Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - frnkeore

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 78
1
Could we see the sonic map?

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: 352 Piston & Rod Hanging
« on: August 31, 2024, 02:18:38 AM »
That's fine for you think anyway you like but, apparently you learned something about Ford engines and what WP's have pressed fits.

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: 352 Piston & Rod Hanging
« on: August 30, 2024, 02:19:42 AM »
How do you get that out of this:

"According to my records, some of the late truck engines had pressed 1.04 WP's."

That's all I said. Are not FT engines, also FE's?

I said some truck engines and I didn't even say all truck engines. It was just a statement of fact. It appears that not many knew that.

4
FE Technical Forum / Re: 352 Piston & Rod Hanging
« on: August 29, 2024, 12:38:50 PM »
This is from my Sterling piston catalog. It also list the same for the 330, 359 & 361, for the same years.

I did say some trucks and didn't say anything about PU's


5
FE Technical Forum / Re: 352 Piston & Rod Hanging
« on: August 28, 2024, 01:07:02 PM »
According to my records, some of the late truck engines had pressed 1.04 WP's.

6
FE Technical Forum / Re: carb size
« on: August 28, 2024, 01:03:06 PM »
For there to be any hope for a carb to be a 850, it has to have 1.75 throttle bores.

The 750/780's have 1.688 bores.

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: FT "cobble"
« on: August 16, 2024, 03:41:26 PM »
With a std size rod bearing in it, add 2.439 + .975 together, devide by 2 = 1.707.

Measure between the 2 bearing holes, with calipers and add the 1.707 and that will give you the approx length. The dist should be ~4.781 for a 6.488 rod.


8
FE Technical Forum / Re: FT "cobble"
« on: August 16, 2024, 01:54:42 PM »
First, is yours a HD/XD 330 or a MD 330. The HD's have the 6.488 length rods.

Second, if you put the 391 crank in, I think you'll also need the 391 flywheel, for it's external weight. The HD 330, also has a forge crank and external weighted FW but, I don't know is the offset weight is the same. BTW, I have a HD 330, that's .060 over. It's not running, I bought it for the crank and to check out the block and cyl wall thickness. It's a later block, '73 date with outside ribs.

9
FE Technical Forum / Re: Scott Vincent Heads Flowed?
« on: August 16, 2024, 03:49:20 AM »
Did you mean the head gasket is a 8554 PT FelPro?

I ran your numbers using a standard Scat/Mahle 18cc piston (H beam rod piston) with 0.00 deck clearance and 65.5cc heads and only got 10.36 CR with the 8554 gasket. They are 12.7cc.

With your, 70° IVC, it puts you at 7.95 DCR, a bit out of the 92/93 oct gas range for your 280 cam, you could try reducing the lash to .018. That will give you a little later IVC and see if that helps any.

If you change cams, you'll need to go to at least a 284 duration on a 110 ICL. A custom cam something like a 284-6/294, 114 LSA/110 ICL with mild lobes. Howards has lobes that would fit nicely in that range.


10
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cleveland intake with Dale’s adapter
« on: August 15, 2024, 02:21:14 PM »
I did and left some support on the ends, to strengthen it and leave something to relocate it, if I need to get it on the mill again. I also took a few pounds out of the adapter, itself.

Jay takes the whole bottom out.

11
FE Technical Forum / Re: Scott Vincent Heads Flowed?
« on: August 15, 2024, 02:15:40 PM »
I ran a few number and you will need at least a 22cc piston dish to get it in the pump gas range.

A better estimate can be done if we know the deck clearance, head gasket and what ever the piston cc is.

12
FE Technical Forum / Re: Scott Vincent Heads Flowed?
« on: August 15, 2024, 11:26:12 AM »
If your going to replace the cam, you can probably address the timing issue with a later IVC.

How big is the engine and what's the CR or, what to the heads cc at?

13
FE Technical Forum / Re: Scott Vincent Heads Flowed?
« on: August 14, 2024, 11:46:56 AM »
Here is my take on it:

Based on what he did with the C1 heads and what Steven Magnotti did with the C8-H heads, I would say that your in the 270-275 cfm range, at best.

270 cfm is about the best you can expect from OOB Edelbrock 2.09/1.65 with a good VJ.

So, it's only a weight issue for those but, you can pick up a lot of hp with TFS or Blair built BBM's.

I would try to find someone to flow your heads and see what you actually have. Please report back if you do.

14
FE Technical Forum / Re: My Tunnel Port Heads Build
« on: August 13, 2024, 01:10:18 AM »
Did Jay mention the push rod mods that you'll have to make on a factory intake, for a ~.700 lift cam?

15
FE Technical Forum / Re: My Tunnel Port Heads Build
« on: August 12, 2024, 12:29:07 PM »
I had to abandon my .309 valves because they were no longer in stock with my valve supplier and would have to wait 4 mo to get them.

I was going to run them with 11/32, 1.75 ex valves, to match in/ex weight, so, I had to buy both at 11/32 and have them drop to Jay so, he can drop ship them to Blair, with the heads, for his 7 angle valve job.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 78