Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Rory428

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Muncie FERR hotels
« on: February 05, 2026, 11:56:19 AM »
I am looking at attending the FE Race at Muncie dragstrip in April, just wondering what the hotel/motel situation in the area is. Is there an "official" hotel, like  the Quality Inn in Selinsgrove PA is for the Beaver Springs event. Any recommendations, or places to avoid? How far are the hotels from the track? I have been to Beaver Springs 3 times, looking to give the Muncie event a look.

2
Non-FE Discussion Forum / 65/66 Galaxie clutch linkage.
« on: October 11, 2025, 11:22:29 PM »
I understand that there was a couple of different versions of some of the clutch linkage used on 65/66 Galaxies, with FE engines. I recently got what appears to be an almost complete set of clutch linkage from , I believe a 66 7 Litre Galaxie, but some of it is quite different from the Mustang and Fairlane stuff that I am more familiar with. I seem to recall somebody on one of the FE Forums had previously posted some photos showing the differences, just wondering if that was somebody here? The Z bar lower lever for the clutch fork has a "hook" style notch, rather than a pin like most other Fords that I am more familiar with, but the rod for it is threaded for adjustment, with a pointy end. However the clutch fork has a beveled hole, that is larger than the end of the rod. So I am wondering if either the clutch fork is the wrong application, or if there should be something to go between the fork hole and the rod. I also have a Toploader tailshaft, supposedly from a 7 Litre Galaxie, which has a different shifter mounting pattern than a Mustang or Fairlane, with the speedo hole on the drivers side, rather than the passenger side.  It also came with a 4 speed console plate, and a shifter body and 2 rods, plus a chrome shifter lever. Wonder if the shifter handle was the same for a console and no console application, the shifter body seems to be mounted fairly high, at least compared to 67-70 Mustangs or 66-69 Fairlanes. And the shifter lever goes straight up a ways before curving. And it seems that there is no over center spring on the clutch pedal, but looks like there is one that mounts on the frame side Z bar pivot and the Z bar itself. And the bellhousing has a pivot ball for the Z bar, rather than a bracket, as used on most other FEs that I have played with . Just trying to find if I have a mish match of pieces, or if  it is a mostly complete assembly for a Galaxie. I would post some photos, but I have never been able to figure out how to post photos on this site from my cell phone. Thanks.

3
I recently bought a bunch of parts left over from a local guys collection after he sold his 66 7 Litre Galaxie. Among a bunch of other stuff, is a NOS set of Ford fender skirts, in a a box with the part number C5AZ-6227964-B. Since that is a 1965 part number, just wondering if they also fit a 66 Galaxie. I just want to be able to make up a correct ad when I put them up for sale. Thanks.

4
Private Classifieds / Some FE stuff that I can bring to the FE Race
« on: September 01, 2024, 10:50:49 PM »
I have a few FE pieces that I can bring with me to Beaver Springs this weekend, if anybody is interested.
Pair of C8OE-N 428 Cobra Jet heads. These are rebuildable cores, will need to rebuilt, with new guides, and seats. One exhaust guide and seat is worse than the others, but certainly rebuildable. 1969 casting dates, if important, I can open the boxes to confirm dates. Heads have valves, no springs or retainers. $500.00 for the pair.
Set of 8 C7AE-B "big bolt" 428 Cobra Jet connecting rods with original standard bore "428 Super" marked pistons. These were removed from my 428 CJ when I rebuilt it and bored it 2 years ago. $150.00.
Pair of C5AF-9510-BD Holley carbs for a 2x4 427. Both carbs have List 3300, and dated 373. These are clean, rebuildable cores, that must have been bought "over the counter" in the mid 70s. The correct pins for the factory 2x4 throttle linkage, and the connecting tubes for the vacuum secondary are intact. One has the choke assembly, the other does not, my understanding is that the over the counter carbs came as a pair of BD models, but one was missing the choke assembly, and that was really the only difference between the BC and BD carbs, that were installed on factory 427 MR 2x4 cars. $750.00 for the pair.
If interested, let me know by Monday, and I will put the stuff in the trailer. Thanks.

5
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Beaver Springs!
« on: September 01, 2024, 05:28:18 PM »
Just wondering how many are planning to go to the annual FE Race & Reunion at Beaver Springs PA next weekend? It`s about a 20 hour drive each way for me, so will be leaving Tuesday morning. After flying in twice as a spectator, will be nice to finally be racing something at this great event. Even the weather forecast looks better than it usually is for this race.

6
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Anybody have an old BlackJack Headers catalog?
« on: January 18, 2024, 07:26:32 PM »
I was at a buddys engine machine/parts store the other day, and he found a few boxes of brand new BlackJack Ford  headers , still in the box, that have been sitting in his attic for many years. Trying to help him figure out what the applications are for. One set has part number 3603, and are 289-302-351W flanges, the other has 3622, and my guess is 351C/M/400 , likely for a 2 wd PU truck, but not positive. He also has a new set of Hedman headers for a 75-78 302 Mustang 11, if anybody knows anybody looking. Thanks.

7
FE Technical Forum / Bellhousing has a weird casting number.
« on: January 18, 2024, 07:19:20 PM »
The FE manual transmission bellhousing that I am currently using on my 59, is the early, long starter version, with only the narrow transmission pattern. What has me confused, is the casting number, as it does not have either the 3 letter "Exx" style prefix that was used in 58 and earlier, the "575" "boxcar" numbering that most of my original 59 engine parts had, or the later, and still in us "B9" C0" "D1" code. The casting number is CAK 6394 C, which doesn`t match any Ford casting system that I am familiar with, and a casting date of 0K4, which is October 4th 1960, for for a 1961 model year vehicle. Anybody familiar with that CAK designation? Thanks.

8
Private Classifieds / Some FE stuff, that can be delivered to FERR
« on: September 03, 2023, 10:39:35 PM »
Deleted ad, decided to cancel the trip this year, hopefully next year!

9
FE Technical Forum / Duraspark, need a resistor or not?
« on: July 15, 2023, 06:21:27 PM »
I have been running factory Duraspark ignitions for decades, both factory installed, and as a conversion from points. On my FE powered Fairmont drag car, I ran a recurved junkyard Duraspark for over 30 years, with a MSD 6T ignition box, and on my 74 F350, I added another junkyard Duraspark with a factory blue Duraspark ignition module, and in over 25 years, never had an issue with either. Currently, I have a 428 CJ in my 59 2 door sedan, with yet another (recurved) junkyard Duraspark distributor, along with a factory Duraspark blue module. I have been driving the car for about 5000 miles over the past 3 years, and all seemed fine. However, last weekend, a racing buddy from 4000 miles away, came for a visit, so I let him run my 59 at our local dragstrip, while I ran my Fairmont. This was the first time racing the 59, with the fresh 428, and it seemed kinda weak, and he said that above 4500 RPM, it seemed kinda lazy. (on the dyno, pear HP was at 5400). It wasn`t misfiring, just didn`t pull as well as I thought it should. Anyhow, as an experiment, I bypassed the 59s factory firewall mounted external ballast resistor (no idea of the amount of resistance), and ran full 12 volts to the ignition. Next pass, the car picked up 4 tenths of a second, and he said it ran much stronger, so we left the resistor bypassed, and made several more 1/4 mile passes, and then drove it home, and I have been driving it some since seems fine.  However, after doing some googling, I am seeing conflicting information. I have seen some opinions where they say to run 12 volts, other say it needs a resistance of 1.10 ohms, some say 0.7 ohms. Just wondering if anybody actually knows for certain. I have heard that there was "Duraspark 1", and "Duraspark 2" versions, supposedly the small cap models were the 1, and the large 2 piece cap were the 2. Since the only FEs with factory Durasparks, were used on 75 and 76 trucks, and all those that I have seen had the small cap, I ASSume the truck FEs were all Duraspark 1. So... to make a long story a bit shorter, I am wondering if running 12 volts will be detrimental to a long life of my ignition, or if I need to run a certain amount of resistance. The engine runs stronger at 12 volts, but don`t want to fry anything, as 2 hour drives to various car meets is not uncommon. I have heard that later (60s-70s Fords) used a pink resistance wire, at least on a points application, but no idea what factory Duraspark vehicles used.

10
FE Technical Forum / FE ARP head bolt torque?
« on: May 03, 2023, 07:38:32 PM »
I am about ready to bolt the TFS heads back on my fresh 428 short block, but it appears that  I have misplaced the instruction sheet that came with the ARP head bolt kit, PN 155-3601. Anybody have the torque specs that ARP called for with these bolts? Thanks.

11
FE Technical Forum / Tremec TKX vs Toploader with a Gear Vendor
« on: January 01, 2023, 04:25:12 PM »
I currently have the 428 from my 59 all apart, and since the Toploader 4 speed is also out, considering something better on the freeway. My normal rear is a 31 spline Detroit Locker, which I want to retain. Since many of the events around here require at least an hour or more of freeway speeds, I want to have something with overdrive. I am mostly considering either a new Tremec TKX 5 speed, or adding a Gear Vendors overdrive unit to my existing toploader , which is a small spline wide ratio unit. Both the TKX and GV are pretty close in price, although the TKX will require an adapter spacer to use my factory bellhousing, plus a new clutch disc, and possibly a different shifter to avoid cutting a different hole in the tunnel, and a new carpet set, as well as modifying the trans crossmember and mount, and possibly the floor/tunnel to make it fit. I also want to keep my factory mechanical clutch linkage. Has anybody actually install a TKX in their FE powered vehicle, and have some real life driving impressions, and advice on what needed to be modified to fit in an older car.
Also interested in hearing any similar impressions about a Gear Vendors unit, for fitment and function. The car is mainly a street car, but will see dragstrip duty, with slicks, at least twice a year.
Perceived pluses for the TKX is a brand new transmission, likely a bit lighter, plus the Toploader could be sold to help offset the cost of the TKX, or used in another car, but having heard how other Tremecs don`t like full throttle power shifting at the track is a concern, as is concern over shifter position, possible floor cutting, trans mount fitment, and the need for a new clutch, or at least, a new disc.
I love the way my Toploader shifts, how the Hurst Super Shifter looks , plus I already have it, and it works well. But I have to wonder if the Gear Vendor will require tunnel/floor surgery, if the extra length behind the trans crossmember will cause issues with driveshaft /pinion angle issues, and require modifying my existing exhaust system to make it fit. Anybody have any thoughts on either, or both scenarios?

12
FE Technical Forum / Fel Pro head gasket comparison
« on: December 15, 2022, 09:59:00 PM »
I have been using Fel Pros 1020 head gaskets for years, but wondering if anybody has any specs for the regular 8554PT FE head gaskets. Seems that information is readily available for the 1020 (4.400" bore, .041" thickness, 10.1 cc volume), but I haven`t been able to find this info for the 8554PT.  I have seen 2 different thicknesses listed (.048" and .0572), quite a spread. I know the bore shape is irregular, but has anybody actually measured a 8554 for thickness and volume? And anybody use the 8554 for moderate performance use with aluminum heads? Just trying to weigh my options for when my new pistons finally show up. Thanks.

13
FE Technical Forum / DSS Pistons?
« on: October 27, 2022, 11:17:14 AM »
I have the 428 from my 59 torn down, it is standard bore, cylinders are still standard bore, measure straight, but have shadows at the top from ring ridge. Anyhow, figure that it`s time to bore it, and a buddy that did my machine work back when I lived in BC, has been using pistons from DSS, and he likes them. This is mainly a street cruiser, that sees the dragstrip once or twice a year, on pump gas, (91 is the highest octane available here), so I want to drop the compression a little, hopefully 9 1/2- 10.0-1, and DSS shows a .018" dish, plus valve notches, their chart shows 10.20-1 with a 65cc chamber, and 9.54 with a 72 cc chamber, so they should be pretty close with my TFS heads.  They have a 1/16"/1/16"/3/16" ring set, just wondering if anybody has any experience with DSS ? Also, they offer these pistons in 2 alloys, 4032 or 5023, not sure which would be preferable for my application, which has a mild solid flat tappet cam, and will likely never see 6000 RPM. Thanks.

14
Non-FE Discussion Forum / 2022 FE Race and Reunion.
« on: July 26, 2022, 07:51:22 AM »
I have not heard much about the FER&R on here lately, just wondering how many are planning to attend.TomP and I flew in for the 2018 event, but being an almost 50 hour drive each way, bringing a car was not really viable. However, now that I moved 4000 miles East 2 years ago, it is "only" about a 1000 mile haul, each way. So despite the very high gas prices, I am planning to tow the 59 down for this years event, providing a trip to the local dragstrip next month is positive. To help pay for the gas, (8 mpg towing with my V10 F350), I have elected to just race at my local track this year with the Fairmont, I had planned on a couple of races at 2 other tracks, each which is 6 hours away, one way, as gas here in Eastern Canada has been a bit over $2.00 per liter , for regular,(3.78 litres per US Gallon, so about $7.50 per US Gallon, although gas has come down to $1.83 per liter, so "only" about $6.90 per gallon now!) So the money I save by skipping those 2 races can be used for the trip to Beaver Springs PA. When we were there in 2018, we stayed at a hotel in Selinsgrove, that many attendees were in, but I don`t recall the name of the hotel, anybody know? I assume the event will not be going back to April again, right? Hopefully the weather co operates. A bonus for me, is that the big NHRA National Event at Maple Grove PA is the following weekend, so as long as I have a safe place to leave the trailer for a few days after the FE race, I can go the Maple Grove for a day or 2 before heading home.

15
Non-FE Discussion Forum / A/F ratio gauge
« on: July 26, 2022, 07:23:58 AM »
Just wondering how many of you guys are using air fuel ratio gauges for checking and tuning your engines. I am considering buying one, as with modern gasoline and ignition systems, not having much luck getting the spark plugs to show much color. Is anybody aware of a gauge that doesn`t require cutting and welding the headers, similar to how emission testing equipment has a long probe that slides into the tailpipes, with a temporary gauge install, as I would like to use such a gauge to get the jetting good, but don`t really want to permanently mount  a gauge inside the car, plus it would be portable, to go from one car to the other. The headers on my 347 SB Ford, already have a welded O2 sensor bung welded onto 1 header tube on each side, for use on a 5.0 EFI car, but not really wanting to modify my coated FPA headers on the 59. As for the gauge kit, any recommendations, for or against any particular brands or style (digital vs a needle or lights.) Since the Fairmont runs leaded gas, I understand that will cause problems with the O2 sensors life, so ideally, I would like to get the 59s 428 dialed in first. Thanks.

Pages: [1] 2 3