1
FE Technical Forum / Re: current fuel injection options?
« on: May 28, 2024, 06:31:12 AM »
I have the Holley Terminator X on a 406 for about 18 months and to tell you the truth, how's that saying go "If I knew then what I know now", I would have kept my Quick Fuel 750 SS AR.
I only use mine on the street, it's a 4 speed car with the Comp 282 cam, MSD..
Fuel injection helps with vapor lock but a return regulator close to your carb solves that problem.
MPG, don’t let them fool you 10 is about the best I get on both
Performance, I got the stealth and found out you can’t set it up like progressive linkages, so it’s either idol or all in, makes it kinda tuff with a clutch on hills.
The ads don’t tell you that it doesn’t like dual plane manifolds or cams with 110* lobe separation or more.
Both my Quick Fuel and my Terminator X Stealth were set up on dynos so that’s about equal.
I saw my engine on a engine dyno make 430 hp, 460 trq with the Quick Fuel.
So if I had to do over again I would have saved about 1200 dollars, and I know how to work on carbs but not EFI. So if I start having a problem ’ll just go back to Carburetor.
I only use mine on the street, it's a 4 speed car with the Comp 282 cam, MSD..
Fuel injection helps with vapor lock but a return regulator close to your carb solves that problem.
MPG, don’t let them fool you 10 is about the best I get on both
Performance, I got the stealth and found out you can’t set it up like progressive linkages, so it’s either idol or all in, makes it kinda tuff with a clutch on hills.
The ads don’t tell you that it doesn’t like dual plane manifolds or cams with 110* lobe separation or more.
Both my Quick Fuel and my Terminator X Stealth were set up on dynos so that’s about equal.
I saw my engine on a engine dyno make 430 hp, 460 trq with the Quick Fuel.
So if I had to do over again I would have saved about 1200 dollars, and I know how to work on carbs but not EFI. So if I start having a problem ’ll just go back to Carburetor.