Author Topic: 48 rte or re behind a FE  (Read 3803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gregaba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 963
    • View Profile
48 rte or re behind a FE
« on: March 10, 2020, 06:39:02 PM »
Was at a friends shop today looking at OD transmissions.
While comparing tranny size he suggested I use a Dodge 48 rte or re. The were installed behind the Viper truck so should hold the power of the Fe good.
I really liked the size of these, about the same size as a C-4. He had 2 of them out and 1 was for a 4x4 and the other for a RWD.
I would have to build my own crank and bell houseing adapter and figure how to mount a starter as I could not find an adapter for that combination with a quick search.
Any thought's of this tranny and possible adaption?
Greg 

TomP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2020, 09:02:54 PM »
I thought those SRT10 trucks used a t56?

gregaba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 963
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2020, 09:46:02 AM »
Thats what I all ways thought to, but I don't pay much attention to Dodge product's.
My friend races Diesels and does a lot of tranny work and he has been known to pull my leg sometimes.
I will check his claims out next time I drop by the local Dodge dealer and see what they say.
If it will handle the power then it is just a matter of building an adapter set up for it.
I really liked the small size of it for an OD, but if it won't hold up then I will look else where.
Greg

e philpott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2020, 09:53:35 AM »
it's a good transmission based on a 727 ,the RH version (pre 2002) is a mechanical 3 speed and a add on electronic 4th and lock up lots of upgrades you can do too
« Last Edit: March 11, 2020, 09:59:12 AM by e philpott »

gregaba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 963
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2020, 11:00:22 AM »
Good to know.
 I know nothing about this tranny and plan to do a little research this evening when I can get the time.
All info is appreciated.
Greg

hwoods

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2020, 04:58:37 PM »
Lenco making a 6  speed ST 1200 street trans now.  supposed to be good for 1200 HP.  anybody got good deals with Lenco?
it is hard to balance your check book with your testoserone level
Previous FE Cars:   1965 Ford Galaxie 390/4spd then upgraded to 427 sideoiler
1970 Maverick 427 sideoiler.  X Pro Stock Car, previous owner had a cammer in it but that was beyond my budget
Current build in progress 1964 Thunderbolt Clone

gregaba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 963
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2020, 05:30:00 PM »
Lencos are great tranny's but a bit expensive. $6200.00 is a little out of my budget range.
If i was still racing I would consider one as we used to run them in our Pro Stock cars.
I like Lenco's and Jerico's both but won't need that much of a transmission I hope.
Greg

gdaddy01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 663
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2020, 07:19:27 PM »
you don't want 1200 horsepower ?

gregaba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 963
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2020, 07:23:54 PM »
If I had 1200 horsepower I would have to sell some of it.
Greg

e philpott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2020, 09:23:04 AM »
The RE version is full electronic and still based on a 727 but with a electronic governor and shift solenoids so it would for sure need a computer to operate and to be able to adjust shift points and lock-up ect .

 RH is the hydraulic version but would need something electronic to control 4th and lock-up TCC along with a TV cable ( throttle Valve ) or TV Rod hooked up unless you went full manual valve body

I would say the 727 is closer to a C6 with a smaller Bell and the C4 is more like the 904 version of the 727 but it's been years since I've overhauled any 3 or 4 speed Mopars

gregaba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 963
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2020, 11:26:49 AM »
Thanks for the reply.
 I still havn't had time to research this. I am not to worried about the electronics as I can take care of that.
When looking at the tranny I was just surprised at how small it was compared to other overdrive's, It was still in the truck on the lift but looked a lot smaller then a 727 or C6.
It is just an ideal as I am still considering a TKO 600 5 speed but am comparing cost and can go either way. Might be better to go with a standard as I will be using the C8AX-6250-D cam.
Greg
 

1967 XR7 GT

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 157
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2020, 02:47:45 AM »
Here are some tranny options, I was planning to upgrade my C6 at some point after I get it running and will probably go with one of these options:

4R70W Transmission is Done

6R80 Transmission

Transmission Gearing Ratios



Richard

 "Frankly, I'm tired of hearing all the complaints; makes me wonder why I bother hosting this forum."

FirstEliminator

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2020, 12:41:17 PM »
ephilpott is correct on the Chrysler trans. If you are going to need an adaptor plate and a computer to run it, the Chrysler trans wouldn't be my first choice.  I'd go with a 4R70w. Or, the 6R80 sounds intriguing.  My question with the 6 speeds (whether it is from GM, Chrysler or Ford) is they are all clutch to clutch shifting that takes a lot of programming including engine management to get the proper shift over lap. US Shift has a TCM to do this and claim they have a good algorithm to make it work.  I haven't personally felt the shift quality, though I think I'd take the chance on installing a 6R80 if I were to replace the C-6 in my wagon.
Mark
Berkshire Transmissions
North Adams, Massachusetts

70 Cougar XR-7 460 C-6
70 Cougar XR-7 conv 351c 4v FMX
69 Cougar SS 351w AOD
69 Cougar Sunroof Eliminator 351w FMX
69 Cougar XR-7 390 C-6
68 Monterey 390 C-6
68 Monterey conv 390 C-6
64 Montclair Marauder 390 Merc-O
58 Monterey 383 Merc-O
58 Parklane 430 MultiDrive
68 Colony Park 428 C-6
68 Colony Park 390 C-6
58 Parklane 430 MultiDrive
70 Cougar Eliminator 351c 4 speed
I don't feel like a hoarder.

hwoods

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 468
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2020, 01:01:44 PM »
whatabout adding a GearVendors Overdrive?
it is hard to balance your check book with your testoserone level
Previous FE Cars:   1965 Ford Galaxie 390/4spd then upgraded to 427 sideoiler
1970 Maverick 427 sideoiler.  X Pro Stock Car, previous owner had a cammer in it but that was beyond my budget
Current build in progress 1964 Thunderbolt Clone

FirstEliminator

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
    • View Profile
Re: 48 rte or re behind a FE
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2020, 01:31:07 PM »
Gear Vendors helps a little. It only does half of what an OD trans does.
Mark
Berkshire Transmissions
North Adams, Massachusetts

70 Cougar XR-7 460 C-6
70 Cougar XR-7 conv 351c 4v FMX
69 Cougar SS 351w AOD
69 Cougar Sunroof Eliminator 351w FMX
69 Cougar XR-7 390 C-6
68 Monterey 390 C-6
68 Monterey conv 390 C-6
64 Montclair Marauder 390 Merc-O
58 Monterey 383 Merc-O
58 Parklane 430 MultiDrive
68 Colony Park 428 C-6
68 Colony Park 390 C-6
58 Parklane 430 MultiDrive
70 Cougar Eliminator 351c 4 speed
I don't feel like a hoarder.