Author Topic: Scat crankshaft straightness  (Read 2308 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AlanCasida

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Scat crankshaft straightness
« on: October 14, 2019, 08:57:43 PM »
What would be the tolerance for a crankshaft to considered ok for straightness? With my Scat crank in the block with only #1 and #5 main caps torqued down(All other bearings removed) I get about 0.001" out of round measuring on #3 main journal using a dial indicator and rolling the crank. I don't think I have ever had an OEM crankshaft that was anything other than dead on.

C6AE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
    • View Profile
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2019, 09:17:21 PM »
Is it an out of round journal, or is it bent?

AlanCasida

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2019, 09:19:32 PM »
I don't think it is the journal. I will double check it though.

winr1

  • Guest
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2019, 09:54:59 PM »
Did ya indicate the snout an perhaps the machined area for the flywheel hole ??

EDIT: ya indicate 2 an 4 as well  ??


Ricky.

Falcon67

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2151
    • View Profile
    • Kelly's Hot Rod Page
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2019, 09:09:24 AM »
IMHO that's a lot.  The stock cast crank in my 351C checked at .0005 TIR. 

EDIT - that was on a surface plate with V-blocks.  Not in the block riding on bearings. 
« Last Edit: October 16, 2019, 10:49:19 AM by Falcon67 »

AlanCasida

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2019, 05:37:18 PM »
 I got to thinking about how I was measuring the crankshaft. The dial indicator moves a total of .001" so does this mean it is really out .0005" since it I would be measuring from the bottom of the "bend" to the top? Does that sound right?

frnkeore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1128
    • View Profile
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2019, 07:45:09 PM »
Yes, it is .0005 off center.
Frank

Thumperbird

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
    • View Profile
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2019, 08:09:37 PM »
I would say maybe yes, maybe no, depends on your setup.  Is the rate of change on the indicator consistent through the 360 degrees?  How much would the crank sag in the middle unsupported, it's not 0.  I would try 2 and 4 and measure again just for fun to verify.  In fact, just support it with 1/2 a bearing and spin it, if truly out of round it will indicate that way still.

 

runthatjunk

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #8 on: October 16, 2019, 01:39:59 AM »
65 shop manual says TIR of .002ok wear limit of .003 for all engines.  I would be curious if it measured any different in a V-block setup.
1965 390 Galaxie 4 Speed
1966 428 Thunderbird

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
    • View Profile
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2019, 01:23:10 PM »
I had a SCAT crank here that had the oil slinger machined incorrectly.  It hit within it's groove.  Unlikely, but check and see, it would have lifted the crank during a turn.
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

frnkeore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1128
    • View Profile
Re: Scat crankshaft straightness
« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2019, 04:31:48 PM »
The mains are machined and ground, between centers. Meaning the crank is supported on both ends, only. They are done that way to keep everything on one plane.

If your crank will sags, you need to get rid of it, as it's not very strong and won't survive.

W/o a lathe available, supporting it on #1 and #5 with 2,3& 4 bearing shells removed, would be acceptable and akin to supporting it in V blocks.
Frank