Author Topic: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing  (Read 12761 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

677litre

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« on: February 23, 2016, 06:25:12 PM »
I picked up a set of 14 bolt C6AE-R today that need rebuilding but overall in good shape. Yes I'm aware money is better spent on some Edelbrocks but lets for a moment disregard that, partly because I want to stay true to the stock look for the year I'm restoring and second I like the challenge of getting what I can out of old iron within reason, it's a street car not a drag racer.

Looking for links to porting these specific heads, pictures are always nice. I know about the exhaust lip to be removed.

With a 30 over 428, dual quad low riser intake, what are the largest and/or most beneficial valves I can install? With stock piston? Aftermarket pistons required for larger valve relief for largest valves installable?   Note: I may still go the stroker kit route for the extra cubes.

I'm going with a roller cam, haven't decided specs yet, open to suggestion on that as well. Pump gas friendly.

Thanks.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2016, 06:26:59 PM by 677litre »

Phil Brown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2016, 12:14:01 AM »
The set that I got have a 2.09 intake and a 1.75 exhaust
There close but they don't touch    ;D
Just some "cleanup" in the ports. There on a 4.250 bore motor and make good power

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3966
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2016, 06:52:51 AM »
I have run 2.15/1.67 in iron heads and they work well.  Bigger exhaust valves will get real close to the bore and can hit with a lot of lift.  Bigger intakes will fit, but there is debate on whether it helps as it gets closer to the bore.  In a 428, I'd likely go 2.15/1.67 and then focus on the valve job and the rest of the bowl to make a nice smooth path to the new valves.

---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

677litre

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2016, 11:52:18 AM »
Recommendations on where to buy decently priced complete valves, guides etc etc?  The local machine shop will just be buying and marking up the same stuff so they told me they don't mind me buying all the parts myself.

Refresh me on the thermactor port bumps in the exhaust, they can be ground smooth correct?


With regards to the R heads specifically - how large can you take the exhaust before it is an issue.  I know there is not much meat on the one side of the valve seats.  It also sounds debatable whether installing new exhaust seats is necessary if not needed with so little there to hold the seat in place.


The links in this old thread are long gone dead and I was wondering if anyone has any old the old pics and info discussed?

http://www.network54.com/Forum/74182/thread/1156317484/C6AE-R+exhaust+hump+removal


jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7437
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2016, 02:26:19 PM »
I think Barry R sells the valves you want.  A lot of people just go up to CJ sized valves, which are 2.09/1.65, and that's a pretty good improvement.  Not sure how big you can go with the exhausts on those heads...

Yes, you can grind the thermactor bumps out of the exhaust ports, and that would be one of the first things I'd do if I were you. 
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

677litre

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2016, 06:15:34 PM »
Thanks Jay,  just to be clear on the thermactor bumps, they are just solid as part of the castings and not hollow on these right?  That is, they can be completely ground down to port size without worrying about breaking through correct?

fastback 427

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 442
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2016, 06:43:05 PM »
You can also try www.alexparts.com for what you need. I've ran a few sets of his valves, retainers, seals and locks with good results. Cheap prices with quick turnaround.
Jaime
67 fastback 427 center oiler 428 crank Dove aluminum
top end toploader
67 fairlane gta cross bolted 12:1 390 Dove aluminum top end c6 3600 stall
65 falcon straight axle project
67 mustang coupe project
76 f350 dually 390 mirror 105 4bbl 4spd
74 f100 xlt 390 c6 factory ac

677litre

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #7 on: February 24, 2016, 07:56:19 PM »
You can also try www.alexparts.com for what you need. I've ran a few sets of his valves, retainers, seals and locks with good results. Cheap prices with quick turnaround.

The Link seems to be broken. :(

Edit: I found the right link.  Thanks. :)

http://www.alexsparts.com/

677litre

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #8 on: February 24, 2016, 08:12:24 PM »
Is it worth going with 11/32" guides and valves?

ScotiaFE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1409
  • Howie
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2016, 08:30:58 PM »
If your going to do a nice valve job/upgrade go with a 45* seat on the intake.
A stock CJ intake seat is 30* and not the best starting point for serious upgrades.

Phil Brown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2016, 12:56:06 AM »
Thanks Jay,  just to be clear on the thermactor bumps, they are just solid as part of the castings and not hollow on these right?  That is, they can be completely ground down to port size without worrying about breaking through correct?
                                                                                                                                                          Mine were solid , gone now  ;D I don't think any were hollow but I could be wrong

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3966
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2016, 07:05:04 AM »
Just for reference, here is a C8AE-H with 2.15/1.67s in a 4.05 uncut 390 block.  You can see there is a ton of room for the intake valve even in the small bore, but you can also see the exhaust gets tight, and gets tighter with lift.

I like the Alex's parts CJ valves for a budget build, but I am not sure they have 2.15 intakes.  If going that route, and it assuming it isn't a big power maker or racer, I'd likely go with their CJ valves, my hunch is the money would be better spent on the valve job and bowl work.

If it's a hotter/higher RPM motor, I'd likely spend the money for Ferrea or some other higher end component.  FWIW I run Ferrea in my Mustang, but I did try the Alex's parts stuff in my 445 truck motor, it never sees north of 5000-ish.  Have had heard only good things about Alex's cheap valves from others too





---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

677litre

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2016, 11:39:24 AM »

2.15/1.67s look like they might be perfect for a 4.160 bore 428 though?  i could see going bigger but there doesn't appear to be much more without the valves touching?  I'll contact Andy's but it looks like they only sell certain sizes.  If I go the Ferrea route is there a supplier you guy recommend?

With regards to the factory cast but not machined  thermactor ports on these,  I'm still not sure if they are solid or actually open on these castings.

Joe-JDC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1502
  • Truth stands on its own merit.
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2016, 11:44:50 AM »
When you say roller cam, are you talking hydraulic or solid?  If you are going to use a large exhaust valve, then you may consider notching the bore of the cylinder just under the exhaust valve in each corresponding bore.  The 427 MR did this from the factory.  It will help unshroud the exhaust valve at lift.  Also it will be beneficial if you are going lift numbers near or over .600" on the exhaust.  Just don't cut into the ring sealing area.  Joe-JDC
« Last Edit: February 25, 2016, 11:46:23 AM by Joe-JDC »
Joe-JDC '70GT-500

Phil Brown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
Re: C6AR-R Porting and valve sizing
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2016, 11:55:41 AM »
Interesting photo showing just how offset the valves are in the bore. Next time mine is down I'am going to have to see how tight it is around the exhaust on the larger bore
I do agree port and bowl work probably better spent money