Author Topic: blown Fe.  (Read 11413 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
    • View Profile
blown Fe.
« on: July 14, 2015, 02:16:38 PM »
Id like to get some input on building an Fe for an 6/71 - roots type blower application. A friend of mine has acquired a 64 falcon that was being built to meet "east coast Gasser's" rules with solid front axle and so forth. He is working on the chassis now trying to finish it up. He also acquired a 390 D4TE block with the extra webbing and fitted with some kind of billet steel Crossbolt caps that I dint recognize.  They dint appear to be pro-gram caps or old PSE caps. Maybe another brand or custom made idk . The block has been completely filled with some type of block Filler, its a darker gray and looks like hardblok to me as moroso fill tends to be a bit lighter in color.    He plans to run methanol or alcohol and only minimal head cooling or no cooling system at all. I realize back in the day they ran these kind of cars with no cooling system but I have no experience with that and my questions would be does methanol or alcohol really Al ow you to do this ? Is this block usable for this or anything or is it now junk ? If it is usable then my next questions would be what kind of stroke and rod lengths would be best for this kinda combination ?  What would be a good base line compression ? The block is a fresh .060 over and only needs some finish honing.  What type of head would be a good choose ?  They can be steel or aluminum.  I'm just curious as to any thought or input. 
Side note, he has a bunch of small block stuff and is also thinking of going that route. Id hate to see him do that and would like to see him go with the Fe. If what he has is usable then I think he would choose the Fe.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2015, 02:22:10 PM by fekbmax »
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3859
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2015, 04:04:30 PM »
He plans to run methanol or alcohol and only minimal head cooling or no cooling system at all. I realize back in the day they ran these kind of cars with no cooling system but I have no experience with that and my questions would be does methanol or alcohol really Al ow you to do this ?

-Yes, running either does provide a cooling effect unlike gasoline. But, both have major drawbacks like poor fuel economy and methanol's tendency to eat up even metal fittings over time. Those and a few others.

Is this block usable for this or anything or is it now junk ?

-You may even get by on gasoline on the street but the full block fill makes that iffy. Great for a drag-only car or boat! 

If it is usable then my next questions would be what kind of stroke and rod lengths would be best for this kinda combination ? 

-I'd say stock to both but your at a .060 boresize already so....not much to talk about here. But if you have no crank right now, a stroker is really no more $ than a std. stroke crank.

What would be a good base line compression ?

-Depends. See the attached FAQs' and chart.  http://www.blowerdriveservice.com/technical-charts.html

What type of head would be a good choose ?  They can be steel or aluminum. 

-Either will work. For FE's, Barry, Jay, Brent and others here can better answer this question.

p.s. commit that total compression chart to memory and one can't go wrong when changing fuel, blower drive speed, etc. 










 
« Last Edit: July 14, 2015, 04:10:49 PM by machoneman »
Bob Maag

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7566
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2015, 07:38:11 PM »
I think for a track-only car you could get by with just cooling the heads and running methanol.  For a roots type blown application, I'd be conservative and stick with 8.5:1 compression.  And I would definitely recommend aluminum heads, which transfer heat better than cast iron and would help stave off detonation.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2015, 07:13:35 AM »
Thanks for the input so far guys. Ill pass all this along. I'm going to ride up this weekend and see what all he has. Be interesting to put an engine like this together. Thanks for the BDS tech link to. Lots of great information there. I'm sure if he decides he wants me to put it together for him then ill be leaning on you guys for more advice.
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3859
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2015, 01:13:13 PM »
Heads - the real trick here is getting a blower intake (i.e. a real as-cast intake) to fit said heads. Hi-Riser and TP blower intakes are rare (former) to non-existent (latter). IMO, any steel FE head that port matches to your selected blower intake is good. But as Jay said, any aluminum head would be better as all have better as-cast overall flow rates than almost all iron heads (HR and TP maybe excluded) better chambers and better exhaust ports.

Getting the best flowing exhaust port and matching exhaust system is key with any blower motor btw.       
Bob Maag

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7566
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2015, 02:38:57 PM »
For a standard medium riser FE head you can get a 351C blower manifold, and use one of my adapters.  That setup would be lots better than most of the FE blower setups I've seen, which are Weiand or Offy manifolds converted for blower use by bolting a plate on top, and forcing all the air through the carb openings.  I think the 351C blower manifolds might be easier to find than a dedicated FE blower manifold also.

Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2015, 04:30:59 PM »
Just an off question, but I've noticed that it seems like 8.5:1 seems to be pretty much a standard for forced induction. Why doesn't it seem like the boost PSI has an influence on that? I would think that there's a big difference between say, 5-6 PSI and an engine that pushes upwards of 20 PSI. Doesn't the boost effectively raise compression? Wouldn't that mean that effective compression is considerably higher in higher boost situations?

I have no experience in forced induction, but my Son has a centrifugally charged Fox bodied Mustang that was based on a stock block. It didn't take long for the block to expire and I'd like to help him build an engine for it, so I'm just trying to learn here.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

Drew Pojedinec

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2141
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2015, 04:59:56 PM »
Doug,
I don't know anything about forced induction with Gasoline engines, but in the Diesel world, we also consider 7psi to be the cutoff.
What I mean, is after 7psi boost pressure we normally figure that without an aftercooler you are just heating the intake charge, and it isn't worth the effort to push more air into it.  I don't know how much of an issue it is with a Gas engine, but I'd assume the colder intake charge would allow you more leniency with compression ratio.

I would assume that hotter air would play a huge factor on the required compression ratio.  Luckily I work on the water, weight isn't an issue, and massive air/water intercoolers are the norm.

Just a thought.
Dp
« Last Edit: July 15, 2015, 05:01:56 PM by Drew Pojedinec »

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2015, 05:15:52 PM »
Good point, Drew. I didn't consider the huge need for intercoolers with more boost. That would explain a lot of it.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3859
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2015, 06:29:51 PM »
http://www.blowerdriveservice.com/technical-charts.html

Take a look again at the BDS chart. The vertical bar on the left is the engine's static C/R. The horizontal bar at the top shows blower boost pressure.  The matrix shows how combining both produces the total or real C/R....more static C/R and more blower boost equals some really high actual total C/R's that can get one into trouble real quick on pump gas....and even race gas. 

At high static levels with lots of boost (see lower right side of the matrix) one must run a methanol or alky blend or pure methanol or pure alky or even nitro as no gasoline racing fuel is made to handle such high C/R's.   
Bob Maag

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2015, 08:40:40 PM »
For a standard medium riser FE head you can get a 351C blower manifold, and use one of my adapters.  That setup would be lots better than most of the FE blower setups I've seen, which are Weiand or Offy manifolds converted for blower use by bolting a plate on top, and forcing all the air through the carb openings.  I think the 351C blower manifolds might be easier to find than a dedicated FE blower manifold also.
I have noticed that as well Jay and was talking with my friend Ralph.  He has found a couple of intakes for a 351c at reasonable prices so if he chooses to go this route soon as I get my adapter from you and know I have it in my hands, (I dint like getting rid of stuff till I have a replacement in my hands
A back ordered blue thunder manifold at close to $1500 fo a Fe compaired to 351 c manifolds at $350 (Australian) to $600 and even if he got one of your adapters new he still would comen out cheaper. Also the added benefit of doing the Cleveland manifold with an adapter, im thinking the spacer plate may not be needed for distributor clearance.
« Last Edit: July 15, 2015, 08:47:21 PM by fekbmax »
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

cammerfe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1676
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2015, 08:44:05 PM »
Please note that methanol is a really excellent 'chemical intercooler'. My first experience with methanol was as a high-school kid going to a local 1/4 mile asphalt track with a friend's uncle. He had a 91 CI Offy on methanol in his quarter-midget track car. He ran it so rich that raw fuel dripped out of the pipes in the pits and the frost formed very thickly on the injectors and intake manifold. It would almost frost-burn your hand to touch it. It cooled very well!

I currently run methanol along with the nitrous oxide spray in my E/F CC ECTA record holder. The fresh engine I'm slowly working on will be blown and I intend to put a Hobbs switch in a pump circuit to turn on the methanol as the boost comes up. I don't expect to use an intercooler.

KS

fekbmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
    • View Profile
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #12 on: July 15, 2015, 08:50:05 PM »
So he should be ok with the full block and just doing the reverse cooling through the cylinder head's ?.
Keith.  KB MAX Racing.

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7566
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2015, 10:00:37 PM »
Just an off question, but I've noticed that it seems like 8.5:1 seems to be pretty much a standard for forced induction. Why doesn't it seem like the boost PSI has an influence on that? I would think that there's a big difference between say, 5-6 PSI and an engine that pushes upwards of 20 PSI. Doesn't the boost effectively raise compression? Wouldn't that mean that effective compression is considerably higher in higher boost situations?


According to the knowledgeable people I know, and my own experience with my supercharged engine, equating boost with compression ratio is flat wrong.  That BDS chart is extremely misleading.  Think about it this way:  Let's say you have a compression ratio of 8.5:1.  If you put 15 pounds of boost into the engine with a turbo, where you aren't losing any power at the crank from turning the blower, you will effectively double the horsepower output of the engine.  Does anyone really think that raising the compression ratio of the engine from 8.5:1 to 17:1, like the chart says will happen, will double horsepower output?  Of course it won't; the entire analogy is flawed. 

Superchargers and turbos work by stuffing more air molecules, and the associated fuel, into the cylinder.  Double the air molecules in the cylinder does not mean doubling the effective compression ratio.  FYI I ran 112 octane in my 489" supercharged FE, with 17 pounds of boost, made 1030 horsepower, and did not experience detonation as long as the air/fuel ratio was in the ballpark.  That engine had 8.5:1 compression, and would have never run at 17:1 compression with 112 octane fuel.

Regarding your original question, I think that for the most part the 8.5:1 number is the result of a lot of experience with carbureted engines.  But you can go higher, with sophisticated fuel controls like EFI, water/methanol injection, or alternative fuels.  The modern supercharged engines from Detroit do just that.  And as far as running more boost, you will need better fuel or an alternative fuel, and maybe a change in the timing curve, and richer air/fuel mixtures.  But the 8.5:1 compression ratio seems to work all the way up to 40-50 psi of boost without a lot of modification.  Not sure why, but there it is...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

HolmanMoodyStroppeGang

  • Guest
Re: blown Fe.
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2015, 10:18:32 PM »
Hi

We did a lot of blown FE's at Ford racing at at local Drag Strips so I will share some stuff.  I have also built,crewed and Crew Chiefed winning blown HEMI's over the decades, for the old school Nostalgia cars from the 60s, many guys on these teams all talk tune up race by race, if a little of it helps a FORD then great.

 We were lucky to have won many races by using a lot of old FORD tricks and old parts like yours, with modern key parts.
 
This is always a team effort and I hope that yours is too.

First, just from the post.  The block is poured with epoxy or a similar block fill

This was not done in the 60s.  An example would be for a much higher power target

The FORD team blown fuel funny cars, and the SOHC engines, ran a water block, and water heads

That is slang for you added water to the block and heads

That would help pull away heat, but also, sometimes signal if you pushed out, or began the 'torch' a head gasket.

Credit the late great Dale Armstrong for sharing with some friends his trick. At the very very end of running stock blocks blown for maximum effort, he quietly told me in around 1970, due to the FORD team we were on, he actually added fine cement based grout.

And it helped.   So your epoxy is a good way to stabilize the bores and decks.   Plus, ALKy seems to send the cooling system less heat than gas, so that helps you.

All blown race engines are not 8.5, but on alky, you can run 8s with just 8 to one

The Funny cars from the 60s, and many of the fastest Dragsters from that era, could be as low as 6 to 1, and many were 7 to one

The thinking always falls into 2 camps it seems

The Tommy Grove style tune up was awesome, it lived great, and is was very reliable.  He ran low compression for a smart reason, more fuel, he will tell you, can fill the cylinder,  Less piston, more chamber volume, so more fuel, and he will say...I liked to build a bigger bomb


That always made me laugh. He says, I used to like firecrackers, so I figured, more fuel,is like a bigger load of gu powder

The PINK SOHC's, ask Ed, did best around 7 to 1.  They flew. I grew up watching so many of them locally.

8.5 to 1 on Alky will be stout man. You spin that blower up and hang on

Now we have a 390

So this is a wedge

So what heads?  Running a blown wedge is not the same, cam and timing wise, BUT, you can make huge and reliable numbers with a wedge, no doubt.

Blown 390s and 406s on Gas were popular in the early 60s, and they ran in the old K88 or Dragmaster chassis, high gear only. Google a K88 or Dragmaster. Short wheel base, light, fast

The Nelson brothers from San Diego County, down by CROWER.

So this sounds like your build?

If you both have not done blown FE's, keep studying

I need to know if you have a maximum blower over drive rule

In Nostalgia Nitro, the NHRA Heritage class we all run, the max is 18 over

So check that

You going to be the Crew Chief?

The 8 8.5 is good, but, strong aluminum rods and good blower pistons are key

I would check out VENOLIA, they do some of the fastest blower pistons, for many top teams, or ARIAS.   They have real talented tuners on the tech desks, big name guys Dads and so on

Many good blown pistons are there

Top ring , stainless

No pin lock, you want buttons. They eliminate the tru arcs and hold the pin centered

I need to know, any street use?

Many around here do short blasts with aluminum rods

VENOLIA has tough ones. They make the ones with ALAN JOHNSON, and they can handle 10,000 HP. They are gorgeous

You have Right Rods, many choices, running a RAT SIZE? Or 392 Chrysler?

The trick for the FORD blown stuff, the fastest stuff, was turning the FE rod journals down to the 392 CHRYSLER size

On ALKY, a RAT with modest boost is just fine.

ALKY is so easy on parts

Ask any Nostalgia Blown Gasser, it is kind of a old deal, it is very hard to burn a piston on alky with a 6-71 unless some , well, it is tuned by the wrong guy

Look into a Magneto

The fuel system is key

Enderle, Hilborn and others can be a huge help

For a race tune, email me. We have friends that win

On the cam, many fast Blwon FE's and Rats run a ENGLE

CROWER is huge

ISKY has old winning grinds tha live and fly   We have set new records with old ISKYS and ENGLES

Many can help

ENGLE is a blown specialist, so is HOWARD, ISKY and CROWER

Need a gear drive to compete

Need a pump, barrel valve, injecter, nozzles, lines, bypasses, fuel shut off

You also really really need a smart fuel tank

You do not want to launch this old guys, and then uncover the supply line down track

The fuel rushes to the back of the tank, so, no cavitation allowed

You do not want to swallow an air bubble and hurt it, going dead lean


I am very VERY happy to hear about this

Running water heads is fine, gone 6 flat that way with iron heads even

Like Jay and your pals suggest, an aluminum head radiates more heat, you want to run studs for sure and a hardened washer, what is great is, the aluminum head is weldable if you hurt it, lighter, so it actually move the C of G back and helps the launch,(center of gravity of, front weight less, rear weight more,,,,when you scale the car(weight the front wheel weight, then rear, they crack less, but, we had a trick for winning some Nostalgia races

Running an aluminum water block, then you divorce the coolant

That means, no water transfer holes in the head gaskets. The iron water heads.

Also won with a billet aluminum block, and only iron water heads.

So a solid iron head on a Dodge, can go 240 MPH plus in a light rail, but aluminum is great, and fixable

You will need a soft copper head gasket

I would o ring the heads if you get to adding a lot of blower

The intake shape is key, you may want to investigate a Delta Plate

That is a plate, below the blower, above the intake, with a small training opening.  These are a trick way to even the fuel flow

More when you guys get closer

I would look into port nozzles


On the 2 pathes to power

You have high static, less blower, and low static, more blower

Garlits was famous for higher compression and a lot of blower.  He mastered how to tune and win this way. Safer is less static, or base compression.

This all depends on how fast you want to go, and how on top of the tune up you know how to be

No front dampener, use a degreed hub

Proud of you guys. We grew up around straight axle cars, guys even ran them on the street


Nice look    Add a tilt front end....fiberglass, and have to have fender wells,,,,or fender well headers, pointed down at an angle

Want a big box style oil pan too, you extend the pick up to the back, so on a hard launch, she stays covered and pressurized

Cool man !

Have fun

Thanks guys

Fun to think like Ford friends and engineers and racers

BEst

T

Have fun

Tom




« Last Edit: July 16, 2015, 12:14:30 AM by HolmanMoodyStroppeGang »