Author Topic: Head gaskets  (Read 8738 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JimNolan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 350
  • 63 Galaxie XL 410ci / 57 Fairlane 500 390ci
    • View Profile
Re: Head gaskets
« Reply #15 on: February 06, 2015, 05:28:43 PM »
Ross,
   I thought everyone knew that. It's not a bad thing, after all, we get more horsepower with those cams. But the actual point of usable stroke and bore isn't at the BDC of the cylinder. Can you imagine the compression if we used all of it.
 BTW: I ordered those valve cover gaskets and they finally sent me an email after a month and wanted to know if I wanted a refund because they didn't know if they'd ever get them from SCE, I took the refund.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 05:34:06 PM by JimNolan »

rockittsled

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • 1976 F-250 390 4v C6
    • View Profile
Re: Head gaskets
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2015, 12:10:44 AM »

Ideally you want .040" of quench. A quench of .063" will promote detonation especially at your relatively low rpm of 2000 rpm
and your use of low grade fuel.
Not sure where how you would gain 20 ci of motor from your plan.
I look at cubic inch as when the valves are closed and you're on the compression stroke.  Different cams give you different useable cubic inch displacement. My 410 probably has about 313 useable cubic inches.
[/quote]Isn't this a different way of looking at Dynamic Compression Ratio calculations?

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Head gaskets
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2015, 07:57:46 AM »
Yes, it's just DCR
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7436
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Head gaskets
« Reply #18 on: February 07, 2015, 10:56:09 AM »

I look at cubic inch as when the valves are closed and you're on the compression stroke.  Different cams give you different useable cubic inch displacement. My 410 probably has about 313 useable cubic inches.

Jim, you're scaring me here  ;)  You are way, way off on this line of thinking.  Have you ever heard of volumetric efficiency?  This is the amount of air the engine uses at a given engine speed, divided by cubic inch displacement.  A performance street engine can easily exceed 90% VE; 100% is not unusual.  A really good race engine can see VE numbers over 125%.  And yet this is with intake valves that close very late, which would result in fewer "usable cubic inches", by your methodology.

Let's say that your 410 had 100% VE; that means it would be using 410 cubic inches of air every two revolutions of the crank.  In your case it might be more like 90%, so it is using 370 cubic inches of air, but it is still going to be far more than 313 cubic inches, as you suggested.  Exhaust scavenging as the intake valve is opening and the ramming effect of the inertia of the air/fuel column in the intake manifold as the intake valve is closing will allow a lot more air into the cylinder at the peak torque point than just 313 cubic inches.

Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC