Author Topic: the great fe head comparo  (Read 12187 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

WerbyFord

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
    • View Profile
Re: the great fe head comparo
« Reply #30 on: May 16, 2019, 09:04:46 PM »
Well I took a crack at the FE Head Comparo with the Gonkulator.

I chose 2 engines. Both are pretty well wrung out on the Gonkulator-vs-Dyno scale so I trust them.
Of course, swapping heads does introduce Gonkulator uncertainty, but most of these heads have some dyno data support too.
And the comparison is free!
1.   Bone stock 428CJ
2.   492 Stroker from Jay’s TGFEIC series with port matched Vic Dominator intake.
These cover the range from 380hp to 650hp so you can see the effect of swapping heads on the range of engines most of us would build.

I’ll compare the common iron heads, the Edelbrock, and a modern average called the Goodhead:
•   C4AE-G et al stock (C1AE-A, B9AE-B, C6AE-R similar) 352, 390, 390PI, 390GT, etc. 1959-1966
•   C4AE-G with 2.09 and 1.66 and ported exhaust roof, aka “poor mans CJ” heads (C6AE-R similar)
•   C8AE-H stock, D2TE-AA similar, 390GT, 410, 7-Litre, 390IP, trucks, etc. 1968-1976
•   C8OE-N stock 428CJ 1968-1970
•   And the “ultimate” head of not so long ago, the box-stock Edelbrock. I’m using the more recent 21st century version, though the late 1990s heads showed better flow numbers.
•   Finally, I lump together 6 sets of modern good heads. Think of Dr Goodhead from James Bond’s Moonraker.
Goodhead is the 6-way average of:
•   TFS head
•   BBM head
•   Survival head
•   Survival CNC head
•   Edelbrock Stage 3J (a little better than Stage 3, this was Jay’s prep for the TGFEIC 492 stroker)
•   Blair’s Pro Port
Since these 6 heads are all pretty doggone good but are all being sold by some of the great vendors that now support the FE, I didn’t want to get into a pissing contest between them as it could be so easily misleading. So I’m just averaging all 6 and calling that average Dr Goodhead. Fair enough? ;)

In each case, for brevity (as if!) I’ll just list
•   Peak Torque
•   Peak Horsepower
•   Ponies, the metric I like, which is the average of the two. I find Ponies correlates quite well with performance of a street car and wide gear spreads of the old 3 and 4 speeds we used to be stuck with back in the day.
•   Delta Ponies vs the Base Case 428CJ iron C8OE-N heads

Stock 428CJ engine including iron exhaust:
Torq  Power  Ponies  Delta
459     346     398     -27     C8AE-H stock
458     360     406     -19     C4AE-G stock
472     377     422       -3     C4AE-G 2.09 x 1.66 & port roof “poor mans CJ”
476     380     425     xxx     C8OE-N 428cj BASE CASE stock 428CJ as FoMoCo built them
484     387     433      +8     Edelbrock 21st century heads. At least they’re lighter.
512    421     464     +39     Dr Goodhead, average of 6 modern heads

Jay’s TGFEIC 492 stroker, port matched Vic Dominator
Torq  Power  Ponies  Delta
516     504     510     -42     C8AE-H stock
521     522     521     -31     C4AE-G stock
538     563     550       -2     C4AE-G 2.09 x 1.66 & port roof “poor mans CJ”
542     563     552     xxx     C8OE-N 428cj BASE CASE
552     594     572     +20     Edelbrock 21st century heads. Better but see below.
585     641     612     +60     Dr Goodhead, average of 6 modern heads

My conclusion is, if you have a good set of C4AE-G etc (or even C8AE-H) and can modify them cheap, and they don’t need serious machine shop money, a set of Poor Mans CJ heads is a good goal. Otherwise jump up to the 1990s-era Edelbrocks (at least).

If you have a decent set of 428CJ heads, don’t bother with the old-school Edelbrocks bos stock. Not much gain.

The real gains show up with any of the Dr Goodhead selections (that makes it easy to remember doesn’t it?)
This is a 9% gain in Ponies on a “mild” 380hp build, and an 11% gain on a 650hp build, vs 428CJ iron which is pretty good already.

A stroker kit picked up about 8% Ponies on a 428CJ level build, which, cost wise, is about in line with the Dr Goodhead average cylinder head gains.

Sure, cams or compression will add Ponies cheaper, but they can make the engine impractical too. Stroker kits or Heads are a good comparison because they don’t really affect streetability. Of course the tradeoff is they cost more than cams or compression or NOSS.

I hope this helps a little, at least food for thought.
The other problem with a dyno head comparo is, as mentioned, compression ratio and/or piston shape would change with each head swap. In the Gonkulator, all that stuff “magically” stays constant. Gonkulator gaskets can also be re-used multiple times – I don’t think I’ve ever changed gaskets in the Gonkulator, except for when Microsoft does an “automatic Windows 10 update”. Ugh.




For fun, I tried a few more different cylinder heads on the TGFEIC 492 stroker engine.
In the Gonkulator, with a few iffy assumptions such as imagining that the valves will somehow fit down the bore, and more trivial issues like bolt pattern and gasket seal, we can try heads from different engine families onto the FE. Here are a couple heads from the Lima Ford and the Rat Chevy, to compare to the FE offerings.

Torq  Power  Ponies  Gain
560     557     558       +6     429SCJ Lima iron, very little gain vs 428CJ iron because exhausts are so bad. >:(
618     684     650     +98     Kaase P-51 Lima heads. Box-stock Lima heads have come a long way since 1970.

568     617     592     +40     L72 Rat iron vintage 1966. It does help when the exhaust can get out. ;D
620     677     648     +96     AFR305 Rat, among the best of newer box-stock Rat heads.

558     611     584     +32     FE HiRiser vintage 1964. The HiRiser was a good competitor to the Rat (and held together better).
Why was the 427 HiRiser head so good, and the 429SCJ head, 6 years later, so bad? Did Ford forget everything? >:(

Notice I refuse to refer to the Lima as the “385 Series”. That name is about as silly as when FoMoCo was using those GM-style 5750062 part numbers back in 1959. Does anybody talk about the “335 Series” ever? What was THAT going to be, anyway?
Notice also that the Lima vs Rat battle looks about equal these days, except that the factory iron Lima block can be built to a lot more inches than the little Rat motor. If only I’d had todays Lima heads back in the disco era! 8)


chris401

  • Guest
Re: the great fe head comparo
« Reply #31 on: May 16, 2019, 11:09:44 PM »
Thank you for the work WerbyFord I didn't know that C4AE-G's with CJ valves were really that close to C8OE heads.

Now I understand the Lima. I always thought you just liked the name of the plant.

428 GALAXIE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
    • View Profile
Re: the great fe head comparo
« Reply #32 on: May 17, 2019, 12:37:19 AM »
  That got sorted out.But werby next time gather all our pennies before you crank up your virtual dyno ;D
Mikko

plovett

  • Guest
Re: the great fe head comparo
« Reply #33 on: May 17, 2019, 06:01:02 AM »
Thanks, Werby!

Very informative.   I feel like you get 99% of the data for 1% of the cost.  I am not by any means discounting your time and effort.  In fact, your time and effort are what make it work. 

paulie

WerbyFord

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
    • View Profile
Re: the great fe head comparo
« Reply #34 on: May 17, 2019, 08:58:44 AM »
Thank you for the work WerbyFord I didn't know that C4AE-G's with CJ valves were really that close to C8OE heads.

Now I understand the Lima. I always thought you just liked the name of the plant.

That's about how mine turned out anyway- you could see the extra G's pulling on the GTECH. That plus a composite of others' dyno tests. It's always subjective, because you cant just plop the valves in there, it's also how well you blend the bowls (I'm pretty amateur but did a 5-angle bowl) and I did as much as I could to the exhaust port roof. If you did a 5-angle job and exhaust roof to the C8OE-N head you'd probably pick up some ponies too, but then their value would be lower, not "as cast" any more.

The Gonkulator isn't as accurate as a dyno series, but as stated, doing this apples-to-apples on the dyno would be costly in dollars and time. Especially trying to bolt those "385 Series" (aka Lima) and "Mark IV Large Block" (aka Rat) heads to the FE block.

machoneman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3851
    • View Profile
Re: the great fe head comparo
« Reply #35 on: May 17, 2019, 08:13:08 PM »
Great and detailed analysis Werby!

Way O/T but I was amazed by your AFR Rat heads and the hp gain. On our circa 1974 431 C.I.D. Unit Stock B, single 4-bbl, BBC '69 Camaro (unported 'stock' heads as required, open chamber steelies) at 3420 lbs, 3595 lbs. with me in it, our best of 10.90 at 128 MPH would have been easy 10.60's, maybe even high 10.50's at 129-130. Amazing progress. 
Bob Maag

TomP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 869
    • View Profile
Re: the great fe head comparo
« Reply #36 on: May 17, 2019, 10:58:56 PM »
Don't let  Bill think you can adapt  BBChev heads or we will never hear the end of it  :)

Besides what intake would we use, or turn the Chev one backwards so the distributor hole lines up and just use a really long rad hose?

 Interesting how much gain or loss there is. Nice info.

RoyceP

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: the great fe head comparo
« Reply #37 on: May 21, 2019, 12:57:26 PM »
I think there needs to be a four volume set. Jay could build four engines that are identical except for the stroke. One engine would be a 390 destroked using a 332 crank. Next a standard 390. Then a 390 with a 428 crank so 410 cubic inches. Finally, a 445 built using a Survival stroker kit. It would show exactly why bigger is always better LOL.

I would donate for that volume!


There,  Joe throws down a marker...He has the parts,  Who has the dyno time?  I am sure we could get volunteers to do the wrenching required.. And donations for fuel and gaskets. I am in...

Jay It would be a nice companion book to the intake comparo.. I can see a 3 volume boxed set with a cam comparo added.. 59.95 on Amazon
W code 427 Cougar GT-E Augusta Green / Saddle XR-7
R code 428CJ Cougar Red / Black XR-7