Author Topic: Throttle body options for port fuel injection  (Read 592 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Urgefor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« on: November 29, 2023, 09:56:04 AM »
I was reviewing options for a throttle body in relation to converting to port injection.  The question I was left with is if there are any performance related advantages or disadvantages to using an EFI throttle body intake elbow along with an EFI throttle body versus a 4BBL throttle body on the EFI intake manifold.  Any insight is appreciated.

« Last Edit: November 29, 2023, 12:35:42 PM by Urgefor »

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7405
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Throttle body options
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2023, 10:36:14 AM »
The Holley throttle bodies are nice because they include the TPS and IAC, and I think they also have the ATS if I recall correctly.  Plus they bolt onto an intake with a 4150 flange. 

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/hly-112-588
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

Urgefor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2023, 11:23:18 AM »
I agree the Holley throttle body is a nice all in one package.  The elbow I linked in my initial post also bolts onto a 4150 flange.  TPS, IAC and ATS aside, I was curious if anyone has compared the elbow and 90mm throttle body versus the 4bbl throttle body from a performance/flow perspective.  I assume if the intake was ported to even out flow between the runners, the elbow would need to be installed while flow testing?  I think the elbow/tb combo would help with hood clearance.  It does seem like the overall cost of elbow/tb would be a bit more than the 4bbl throttle body though when taking into account TPS, IAC and ATS.

pbf777

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2023, 12:02:34 PM »
     The EFI (those which incorporate fuel delivery) throttle bodies which mount directly to the intake manifold replacing the carburetor pretty much accomplish just that, as far as the air flow function is concerned. Aka. it is what it is, it is as it was.    ::)

     Whereas the mono-valve & dual-throat throttle bodies intended for EFI applications with sequential (including bank-fire) port injection, those which often are witnessed with the companion 90 degree elbow, mounted in place of the carburetor, do often present a realization of the issues with both intake manifolds' air distribution characteristics, and then as aided by the elbow installation, inflict biases in air distributions within the manifolds' plenum and inlet port throats often leading to further complicate matters.     :o
 
     Scott. 
« Last Edit: November 29, 2023, 12:08:03 PM by pbf777 »

Urgefor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2023, 12:38:15 PM »
This is in relation to port injection.  I updated the subject to help avoid any potential confusion.

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2023, 06:40:15 PM »
It comes down to volume and packaging. If 4x round holes do not have the area, a single bigger one may, area grows quickly with a single butterfly in large diameter.

For stockers, most factory manifolds work a very large plenum in order to run longer runners within that plenum, those longer runners are good for torque, but also smooth the flow entering a port, all the big open TB has to do is let in air, so a big single is easy

In the case of a standard FE intake, unless the 4150 or Dommy cannot flow enough, the standard throttle body will be a better match to all 8 cylinders
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

Urgefor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2023, 10:01:36 PM »
In the case of a standard FE intake, unless the 4150 or Dommy cannot flow enough, the standard throttle body will be a better match to all 8 cylinders

95% sure that the end game intake will be the Edelbrock Victor Ford FE EFI Intake Manifold.  I'm leaving that last 5% to be open minded about other options.   :)

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3929
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2023, 07:33:27 AM »
In the case of a standard FE intake, unless the 4150 or Dommy cannot flow enough, the standard throttle body will be a better match to all 8 cylinders

95% sure that the end game intake will be the Edelbrock Victor Ford FE EFI Intake Manifold.  I'm leaving that last 5% to be open minded about other options.   :)

The only benefit I would see with an elbow off the Victor and a TB elsewhere, is the ability to set up a cold air intake, but then you add throttle cable changes, etc. 
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1915
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2023, 09:26:02 AM »
I can tell from testing that a large single blade throttle body (flying toilet..) made more power than a 4500 throttle body on a Victor EFI intake of roughly 700 HP.  I can also tell you that that single blade throttle body was nearly undriveable on the street, where the 4500 was fairly pleasant and remains on the car today.

pbf777

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2023, 01:06:00 PM »
I can also tell you that that single blade throttle body was nearly undriveable on the street, where the 4500 was fairly pleasant and remains on the car today.


     Not the only issue but, the large single blade mounted directly above the manifolds' plenum becomes an effective air diverter under part throttle angles and often results in horrendous air distribution in the intake manifold.   :o

     Scott.

Joe-JDC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1490
  • Truth stands on its own merit.
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2023, 01:22:47 PM »
To be honest, the elbow should only be used for supercharger applications.  I agree with the statement that the throttle blade angle at part throttle skews the air flow distribution.  If it had been a simple solution, then Ford would not have gone to the trouble of creating those upper plenum with the 180* airflow change.  Joe-JDC
Joe-JDC '70GT-500

JamesonRacing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 361
  • 1966 - What a great year for FOMOCO
    • View Profile
Re: Throttle body options for port fuel injection
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2023, 09:08:01 PM »
Holley throttle body on Edelbrock Victor EFI, 48lb injectors
1966 Fairlane GT, Silver Blue/Black 496/C4 (9.93@133)
1966 Fairlane GT, Nightmist Blue/Black 465/TKO (11.41@122)
1966 Fairlane GTA Conv, Antique Bronze/Black, 418EFI/C6
1966 F250 C/S, Rangoon Red, 445/T19
1965 Falcon Futura 4-door, Turquoise, EF! Z2363/4R70W