Author Topic: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results  (Read 6427 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7427
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #15 on: July 10, 2021, 08:16:29 PM »
It is 510", 13:1.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7427
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2021, 08:28:44 PM »
Jay, what material are you using in your 3-D printer?  Before I retired, I had considerable experience with Stratasys/Fortus Titan and MC-900 FDM machines, mostly making aircraft production shop aids and jigs/fixtures.  Polycarbonate was our material of choice most of the time but we had about 6 - 8 materials to choose from.  We would sometimes paint the parts with Featherfill primer; it was thick enough to hide most of the ridges.  I've contacted a former co-worker who is still running the FDM lab at Lockheed Martin to see if Featherfill was effective in sealing the leaks or if he has any suggestions.  I'll let you know what he says if you are interested.

I would be interested in what he says, thanks.  I also have Featherfill on hand here.  I don't know how it will respond to fuel, that would be the only concern.

My printer uses PLA filament (Poly Lactic Acid).
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

475fetoploader

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2021, 09:46:08 PM »
So the printer is potentially Lactose intolerant?
1967  Fairlane Tunnel Wedge on Proports.
1975 4x4 461 f.e. 4speed Dual Quads on 38’s
Love many, Trust few. Always paddle your own canoe.

Joey120373

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 372
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2021, 11:36:30 PM »
If memory serves me, it’s 504 cubic inches at 13:1.


JamesonRacing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
  • 1966 - What a great year for FOMOCO
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2021, 08:03:59 AM »
Wow, great progress!

Curious if the porosity in the manifold would be an issue on a dry manifold fitted with injector bungs?  What do you imagine a SEFI intake would look like for these heads?
1966 Fairlane GT, Silver Blue/Black 496/C4 (9.93@133)
1966 Fairlane GT, Nightmist Blue/Black 465/TKO (11.41@122)
1966 Fairlane GTA Conv, Antique Bronze/Black, 418EFI/C6
1966 F250 C/S, Rangoon Red, 445/T19
1965 Falcon Futura 4-door, Turquoise, EF! Z2363/4R70W

427mach1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2021, 08:09:04 AM »
Jay, what material are you using in your 3-D printer?  Before I retired, I had considerable experience with Stratasys/Fortus Titan and MC-900 FDM machines, mostly making aircraft production shop aids and jigs/fixtures.  Polycarbonate was our material of choice most of the time but we had about 6 - 8 materials to choose from.  We would sometimes paint the parts with Featherfill primer; it was thick enough to hide most of the ridges.  I've contacted a former co-worker who is still running the FDM lab at Lockheed Martin to see if Featherfill was effective in sealing the leaks or if he has any suggestions.  I'll let you know what he says if you are interested.

I would be interested in what he says, thanks.  I also have Featherfill on hand here.  I don't know how it will respond to fuel, that would be the only concern.

My printer uses PLA filament (Poly Lactic Acid).

Well, I'm not going to be able to help you much.  He said the best way to make a leak-free manifold would involve a machine other than a typical 3D printer.  It would require an SLS (selective laser sintering) machine with Nylon-CF as the material.  Another option would be an SLA (stereolithography) with a high temp material.  I would suggest you call your printer manufacturer and see what they say about sealing but can suggest a few things for you to look into.

We used a Devcon 2-part epoxy called Plastic Welder to glue large parts together.  This stuff might work to fill any larger voids, cracks, etc. that you might have.  It might also work as a sealer but that would involve a lot of work, especially inside the plenum and ports.  I'm not familiar with PLA so you would need to check compatability.  I believe Plastic Welder is solvent resistant but it would be worth contacting Devcon to verify.

We used our FDM machines to build a wind tunnel model with built-in surface pressure ports and it was a nightmare trying to leak-check each of the ports due to the porosity of the material.  We could not get a good seal with the suction head.

Edit:  I've asked my former co-worker if he can suggest anything to seal an existing part (rather than build it with another machine/method).  Still waiting for his reply.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2021, 08:40:51 AM by 427mach1 »

Gaugster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2021, 11:43:01 AM »
Cool updates! Just looking at TQ results since HP is also a function of RPM I am seeing general categories as below. My sample size is only 9 dyno results and there are certainly exceptions but....

FE Power heads/induction unported ----> 1.4x ft-lbs per CI
Other aftermarket heads/induction ported ----> 1.3x ft-lbs per CI
Factory ported or aftermarket unported heads/induction ----> 1.2x ft-lbs per CI

Seems reasonable to get into the 1.5x realm with a ported FE Power setup.  :)
John - '68 Cougar XR7 390 FE (X-Code) 6R80 AUTO

WConley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1167
  • No longer walking funny!
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2021, 12:08:41 PM »
Cool stuff Jay!  I bet that backfire was an exciting moment  >:(

It seems that vacuum impregnation is the way to go for getting an airtight part.  You could make up a fixture and apply an epoxy or silicone compound to the PLA manifolds.  Seems like a fair amount of work, but then you'd have awesome capability!
A careful study of failure will yield the ingredients for success.

Royce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2021, 12:19:40 PM »
Bill,  The backfire WAS exciting... ;D
1955 Thunderbird Competition Coupe Altered Chassis "War Bird" 383 Lincoln Y block 520 hp
1955 Thunderbird 292 275 hp Y Block
1956 Ford Victoria 292 Y block

1957 Mercury 2dr Wagon "Battle Wagon" drag car 
1957 Thunderbird Glass body Tube Chassis drag car 333 cu in 500 hp Ford Y block
1961 Starliner 390/375 clone
1965 GT40 tribute w/FE
1966 Falcon Pro Touring project
Kaase Boss 547. 840 HP 698 Torque  pump gas
1992 BMW V-12 5.0
2001 Lincoln 5.4 4 cam.
1968 Cougar XR7

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7427
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2021, 01:03:42 PM »
Yes, wish I'd had a camera rolling...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

428 GALAXIE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #25 on: July 11, 2021, 02:30:26 PM »
 What was the talk about chikencoop live cam.


Just awesome!!!!
Mikko

427mach1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #26 on: July 11, 2021, 03:13:14 PM »
Jay, I heard back.  Featherfill might work but multiple coats would probably be required.  How smooth is the surface of the manifold?  Can you build a test square, spray with featherfill, and pull a vacuum on the surface using something like a brake bleeder?  Another product to look at would be Eurofill Gold body filler if the surface is rough.  Once you get a test square sealed with either featherfill or Eurofill or both, put some gasoline on it to see if it is resistant.

gdaddy01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #27 on: July 11, 2021, 08:01:03 PM »
Bill,  The backfire WAS exciting...        kinda like when Curt Johnson's intake blew off in the pits at a nhra race , no nos of coarse ?

JC-427Stroker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #28 on: July 11, 2021, 11:44:32 PM »
It is 510", 13:1.

Wow ... 1.72 hp per cubic inch from an FE at 7,200 ! !

Nice job Jay.

JC-427Stroker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: More FE Power Cylinder Head Dyno Results
« Reply #29 on: July 11, 2021, 11:52:00 PM »

" I've been thinking about running these plastic manifolds on the dyno for a while, and one concern was if they were going to be airtight or not.  Before the dyno session I had briefly considered painting them all to try to make sure that the external surfaces were all leak free, but I didn't get around to that before the dyno session, so I decided to just bolt on the red sheet metal style manifold and try to run it.  Unfortunately, when we started the engine it was obvious that there was a big vacuum leak, and a few seconds after starting the engine, it backfired and broke the plastic manifold.  So, it was clear that some sort of sealing on the external surfaces of the 3D printed intakes was going to be required.  The joys of R&D. "

How was the one manifold printed differently that the other ?

Nitrous bust panels might be a good idea for the future. If not mounted to the manifold end then burst disks  in the carb spacer(s)