Author Topic: Cam plug retention  (Read 2798 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

philminotti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
    • View Profile
Cam plug retention
« on: July 06, 2021, 09:49:51 AM »
The last time I installed a cam plug, I just ran a bead of RTV around it...I remember seeing a picture a while back of a plug that had a fender washer held over the edge of the plug by a screw that was drilled and tapped into the cam plug boss.  I can't imagine this is necessary, but I wanted to get some opinions...

Phil Brown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2021, 11:05:15 AM »
I have seen that kind of plug retention years ago with the local circle track guys on freeze or core plugs. Use an 8 or 10-32 screw tapped into the block with a washer that overhangs the plug ( one on each side of the plug). Definitely won't push the plug out and put water under the tires.

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7581
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2021, 11:07:03 AM »
I've done that on multiple engines.  It only takes one time for that plug to pop out before you start doing things differently.  Either Permatex #1 (hardening) to hold it in, or 8-32 screws around the hole with washers in place to block the plug's "exit".
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

Nightmist66

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2021, 07:40:47 PM »
I've done that on multiple engines.  It only takes one time for that plug to pop out before you start doing things differently.  Either Permatex #1 (hardening) to hold it in, or 8-32 screws around the hole with washers in place to block the plug's "exit".


Jay, are you referring to the core plug or the cam plug? I put the cam plug in dry and put some clear epoxy over it. The epoxy will chip and break if you need to remove it. JB Weld is a different story.
Jared



66 Fairlane GT 390 - .035" Over 390, Wide Ratio Top Loader, 9" w/spool, 4.86

thatdarncat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1933
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2021, 07:55:15 PM »
I've done that on multiple engines.  It only takes one time for that plug to pop out before you start doing things differently.  Either Permatex #1 (hardening) to hold it in, or 8-32 screws around the hole with washers in place to block the plug's "exit".


Jay, are you referring to the core plug or the cam plug? I put the cam plug in dry and put some clear epoxy over it. The epoxy will chip and break if you need to remove it. JB Weld is a different story.

Jay Brown cam plug retention solution

Kevin Rolph

1967 Cougar Drag Car ( under constuction )
1966 7 litre Galaxie
1966 Country Squire 390
1966 Cyclone GT 390
1968 Torino GT 390
1972 Gran Torino wagon
1978 Lincoln Mk V

cammerfe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1676
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2021, 10:26:26 PM »
Roush engines have the cam plug held in by 2-part epoxy.

KS

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5144
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #6 on: July 08, 2021, 05:40:29 AM »
I've never had one budge, even on aluminum blocks, where the issue could really present itself.  I always just use silicone around the perimeter of the plug then drive in as usual.  I use a freeze plug driving tool to drive in the cam plug and it will usually take some of the convex-ness out of the plug.  I think that puts a little more press to the fit.  I then put silicone around the "gap" where the plug meets the block.

On all of your higher end SBF aluminum blocks, the cam plug is driven in against a shoulder, then there's a snap ring groove to keep it from backing out if it has the inclination. 

If the cam plug is moving, just think about what the cam bearings could be doing....that's why I always green-Loctite them into aluminum blocks.
Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4540
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2021, 06:42:22 AM »
Jay Brown cam plug retention solution



First time I've seen a weight welded to the back of a crank. What's the story on that?
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7581
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2021, 07:12:01 AM »
That is a 4.75" stroke FE crank for my big SOHC.  Crower balanced it, and apparently that welded on piece was required to balance the crank correctly.  I've never seen a weight like that welded on a crank either, but I assume Crower knew what they were doing...
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

BigBlueIron

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 421
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2021, 09:18:53 AM »
On pulling tractor engines (diesel) cranks have extra material (similar to the picture) added to every counter weight for balance.

pbf777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2021, 10:18:49 AM »
First time I've seen a weight welded to the back of a crank. What's the story on that?


     It's not that unusual to see weight added or subtracted from the crankshaft flange, and is completely acceptable, within reason of course.   ;)   This is often done because the value needing to be addressed is not clocked with an available surface of the existing counter weights or journal throws which might accept heavy metal or be readily lightened.  This issue of balance correction requirement being out of phase with the anticipated positions tends to be more prevalent in the "stroker" cranks, as it would seem the original engineering of the crankshaft was for perhaps a lesser offset, and then someone decided it just wasn't worth the time and money to provide a truly properly re-engineered unit for those of "stroker" applications.     :-\

     Scott.

pbf777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2021, 10:33:11 AM »
Roush engines have the cam plug held in by 2-part epoxy.


     This has proven adequate for us, as unlike the cooling jacket core plugs, what is actually pushing on this cup-plug to cause it to be displaced?  If the crankcase pressure is this great, well maybe better plug retention isn't the solution.  :o   And of course in the case of the FE, to avoid having the camshaft push the pug out, be sure to install the camshaft tunnel plug in backwards, oh,......... I mean properly!      ::)

     Scott

cammerfe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1676
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2021, 12:48:46 PM »
Some years ago I did an FE engine build-up article for Mustang Illustrated Magazine at Roush's Prototype Engine Facility, the formal name, at the time, for the build location of all his NASCAR engines.

Among other additions, we re-did the oiling of a 'center-oiler' block. Part of the work was to use roller cam bearings. Doing so necessitated boring the cam tunnel to afford the extra diameter of the roller bearings, and re-grooving the bulkheads. The end result was that no oil escaped at the cam bearings---it all went to the mains, which was the idea in the first place.

The re-boring meant that the diameter of the hole at the last cam journal was enlarged and the 'normal' cup plug was unusable. The solution was to use a plug intended for a 385-series engine. But a cup plug intended to go in 'backwards' comes with the flange shaped differently than the usual. The solution is to bore a hole in a piece of half-inch plate, so sized that the plug, when pushed through, comes out the other side properly shaped to be inserted into the FE block. And the Roush guys used two-part epoxy to make sure it wouldn't come out, just as they were doing on a weekly basis with the NASCAR engines.

KS

Rory428

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1121
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2021, 08:14:35 PM »
Depending on the version of the block plate , that is sandwiched between the block and the bellhousing, the cam plug can not come out anyhow, unless you have a plate with a large hole where the cam plug is.
1978 Fairmont,FE 427 with 428 crank, 4 speed Jerico best of 9.972@132.54MPH 1.29 60 foot
1985 Mustang HB 331 SB Ford, 4 speed Jerico, best of 10.29@128 MPH 1.40 60 foot.
1974 F350 race car hauler 390 NP435 4 speed
1959 Ford Meteor 2 dr sedan. 428 Cobra Jet, 4 speed Toploader. 12.54@ 108 MPH

cammerfe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1676
    • View Profile
Re: Cam plug retention
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2021, 09:41:34 PM »
We were aiming at having the least chance of leaking. You're correct about the plug actually coming out. Working with the NASCAR engine builders exposed me to a zillion small details that they do on a daily basis that had never occurred to me. It was a substantial education.

KS