Author Topic: AN fitting size vs. HP output?...  (Read 7978 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Russ67Scode

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
    • View Profile
Re: AN fitting size vs. HP output?...
« Reply #30 on: September 30, 2017, 06:33:30 PM »
McRobb in tank pick up see attached
Doug why -10 if your running a -8 line ??
BP 520 ci BBM Twin turbo FAST EFI

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4470
    • View Profile
Re: AN fitting size vs. HP output?...
« Reply #31 on: October 01, 2017, 01:06:15 AM »
Doug why -10 if your running a -8 line ??

Because that gives me the option to go larger if it's needed. It's the same cost either way for the AN fitting upgrade, so a reducer is cheaper than having to refit them for -10. I'm pretty sure a -8 will work, but you never know what the future holds :)
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe

Barry_R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1928
    • View Profile
    • Survival Motorsports
Re: AN fitting size vs. HP output?...
« Reply #32 on: October 01, 2017, 06:55:31 AM »
The basic Carter performance pumps (at least the ones that were made back in the day) were perfectly capable of supplying more fuel than needed for the vast majority of street cars.  They had the advantage of being clockable on line position.  Back in the time when I had access to the information, all of the large bodied six valve pumps were being made by one company (Blackstone???) and were relabeled by a wide array of marketers.  No idea whether the guys selling them now are modifying pumps or whether one of them bought the tooling or ?

Holley pumps used to be made by Pierce Governor - I think Carter got that contract for a little while - then who knows.  Carter used to make their own stuff, then that division got sold.  Probably made in azzspakistan now...

As mentioned earlier, the inlet size line is most critical since its under vacuum and working through a tank end restriction at that if you are using some sort of strainer at the pickup end.  A return line system is a huge positive even if its restricted with an orifice, just to keep cool fuel flowing and reduce vapor lock tendencies.

cjshaker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4470
    • View Profile
Re: AN fitting size vs. HP output?...
« Reply #33 on: October 01, 2017, 12:36:35 PM »
As mentioned earlier, the inlet size line is most critical since its under vacuum and working through a tank end restriction at that if you are using some sort of strainer at the pickup end.  A return line system is a huge positive even if its restricted with an orifice, just to keep cool fuel flowing and reduce vapor lock tendencies.

Barry, I will be running a return style regulator just for that reason, but with the carburetors placed so high on the tunnel ram, vapor lock should not be an issue. They're pretty isolated from engine heat :)

The RobbMc pick-up does not use a strainer at the pick-up end, according to his website. Because of that, a filter will be needed as soon as it leaves the tank.
Doug Smith


'69 R-code Mach 1, 427 MR, 2x4, Jerico, 4.30 Locker
'70 F-350 390
'55 Ford Customline 2dr
'37 Ford Coupe