On the Ford dual quad setups there is that hose that ties both diaphrams together to supposedly let both sets of secondaries open together at same rate for balanced fuel distribution.
Now if that is the case why did Chrysler choose to not use this on their 426 Race Hemi cross ram setup using vacuum secondary 770 Holley carbs. With the cross ram almost acting like two separate plenums and carbs,you would think it would need some balanced action for smooth and even secondary action. Note I have expierence with such a Race Hemi setup back in 1971.
Also on Carter AFB carbs there is no type of balance on factory dual quad setups. Did the Ford engineers discover something on their setups?
Have any of you FE engine builders tried running the Dual quad setup without the connection and noticed any different results on the dyno or at the track?
Does the balanced vac flow tend to slow down the operation of the secondaries?
I'm testing and tuning on my current dual 600 Holley setup on a typical 500 HP 427 Windsor setup and trying things to get best secondary operation just short of a bog condition.
The secondary pots with check ball have a .081 diameter feed hole just under the ball seat. What I have started with is remove the ball and insert a slip in bushing with an .040 diameter hole. This will give me an adjustment location to open up or close up the feed hole.
I recently mounted my GoPro camera under the hood to do a 2nd to 3rd gear test on secondary operation.
This video is of the second test with the weakest secondary springs...the White spring.
Rear end ratio is a 3.50 with a TKO-600 manual trans. RPM at shift point 6000. Car test weight 3000 lbs. with driver.
Both carbs were check for bind free secondary throttle movement and it looks like to me the rear carb might still be a tick behind the front reaching full open on secondary.
Feel free to comment on the secondary action.
I may try test again without balance connection and later open up my feed hole to a larger size in small steps.
https://youtu.be/tuv8zDdjExM