Author Topic: Cam opinions wanted  (Read 5061 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

c9zx

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
    • View Profile
Cam opinions wanted
« on: March 01, 2012, 03:26:07 PM »
4.25 bore 3.98 stroke Barry's stageX Eds with 10.0:1 SCR 91 octane pump gas in a street car (Cobra, 2500lbs). I like your opinions on a solid flat tappet. Would like to see peak power 5700-6000, So far my thoughts are 248/254@ .050, 110 LSA, .620/.635. All input is very welcomed. Thanks, Chuck
1969 Eliminator G code
CSX-7031 FIA Cobra
2007 Mustang GT, Whipple
1966 Cyclone GT

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7581
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Cam opinions wanted
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2012, 06:17:49 PM »
The 390 stroker dyno mule I tested in my book (445") peaked at 5600 - 5900 with most of the performance manifolds, and it used a Comp 306S solid cam.  The cam was 260@.050, and .640 lift if I recall correctly.  Your engine has more cubes than my 390 stroker, which will tend to drive the peak RPM down just a little.  I'd say you should be looking at around 260 @ .050" to hit the peak power RPM that you are looking for.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

hotrodfeguy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
    • View Profile
Re: Cam opinions wanted
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2012, 08:38:54 PM »
Also in that light of a car more cam is not a bad thing, first gear is going to spin tire no matter what cam you run. Not like you would over cam to the point first gear would be a dog is my point in a light weight car like that.

plovett

  • Guest
Re: Cam opinions wanted
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2012, 07:56:17 PM »
I think you're pretty close to where you want to be.  My 432 inch FE peaked at 6200 rpm with a 240/246 @ 0.050" cam.   There's more to it than just cubic inches and cam duration.  Nonetheless, I think you're close.

Ditto on the "more cam is not a bad thing" for a light car. 

paulie

c9zx

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
    • View Profile
Re: Cam opinions wanted
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2012, 05:00:58 PM »
Thanks for the replies. Does anyone have experience with Oregon Cams? If, so good or bad? Thanks, Chuck
1969 Eliminator G code
CSX-7031 FIA Cobra
2007 Mustang GT, Whipple
1966 Cyclone GT

hotrodfeguy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
    • View Profile
Re: Cam opinions wanted
« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2012, 09:23:16 PM »
I have used them for regrinds and no issues

westcoastgalaxie

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 79
    • View Profile
+2
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2012, 11:21:26 PM »
Ive used them before and will continue to use them. Great customer service and quality. I would call them and ask to talk to Ken. Be prepared to have all of the details for your ride, tranny, rear gears, etc. He knows FE's well.

Rory428

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1121
    • View Profile
Re: Cam opinions wanted
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2012, 12:48:53 AM »
I`ve been running Oregon Cams in my Fairmonts 428s for many years, very happy with them. I have also used their FE rocker shaft support kits, and have had used FE solid lifters re-surfaced by them. Plus Ken & Jason are longtime Ford racers too. I also buy my Brad Penn oil from Ken as well.
1978 Fairmont,FE 427 with 428 crank, 4 speed Jerico best of 9.972@132.54MPH 1.29 60 foot
1985 Mustang HB 331 SB Ford, 4 speed Jerico, best of 10.29@128 MPH 1.40 60 foot.
1974 F350 race car hauler 390 NP435 4 speed
1959 Ford Meteor 2 dr sedan. 428 Cobra Jet, 4 speed Toploader. 12.54@ 108 MPH