Author Topic: Blown 390 on the dyno (not mine)  (Read 1211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hwoods

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: August 01, 2024, 08:18:41 AM by hwoods »
it is hard to balance your check book with your testoserone level
Previous FE Cars:   1965 Ford Galaxie 390/4spd then upgraded to 427 sideoiler
1970 Maverick 427 sideoiler.  X Pro Stock Car, previous owner had a cammer in it but that was beyond my budget
Current build in progress 1964 Thunderbolt Clone

blykins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5153
    • View Profile
    • Lykins Motorsports
Re: Blown 380 on the dyno (not mine)
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2024, 08:11:06 AM »
Wow, that's an expensive 445 hp. 
Brent Lykins
Lykins Motorsports
Custom FE Street, Drag Race, Road Race, and Pulling Truck Engines
Custom Roller & Flat Tappet Camshafts
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
brent@lykinsmotorsports.com
www.customfordcams.com
502-759-1431
Instagram:  brentlykinsmotorsports
YouTube:  Lykins Motorsports

HarleyJack17

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 291
    • View Profile
Re: Blown 390 on the dyno (not mine)
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2024, 01:33:12 PM »
I feel like there was some bad choices on cam and head work in that deal. Maybe there is a reason they did not choose a different cam.......Idk....but talk about leaving it on the table.

fryedaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1314
    • View Profile
Re: Blown 390 on the dyno (not mine)
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2024, 02:09:09 PM »
maybe they built it to last -very mild
1966 comet caliente 428 4 speed owned since 1983                                                 1973 f250 ranger xlt 360 4 speed papaw bought new

Joe-JDC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1576
  • Truth stands on its own merit.
    • View Profile
Re: Blown 390 on the dyno (not mine)
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2024, 02:10:01 PM »
And folks wonder why the FE gets a bad rap in the media.  We made more horsepower that that with a 302HO with completely stock shortblock and 5psi back 30 years ago.  Joe-JDC
Joe-JDC '70GT-500

GerryP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
    • View Profile
Re: Blown 390 on the dyno (not mine)
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2024, 02:36:36 PM »
I watched the video and it appears he's using a Performer 390 intake.  He makes a point that this is a very mild build and isn't supposed to be a power hero.  Maybe it will last forever like that?  It's always hard to judge someone else's work when you don't agree with or understand the premise.  He probably got exactly what he wanted.

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4222
    • View Profile
Re: Blown 390 on the dyno (not mine)
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2024, 03:01:28 PM »
Could be, but that supercharger is just making heat if it can't push through the intake and heads which is no benefit.

FWIW, with a 216 duration cam, with good heads on a 347, we did 370 naturally aspirated, put the belt on did 586 hp at 7.5 psi.  Was gaining every pull with RPM but we were afraid to go any higher with a stock iron block
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch