Author Topic: Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI  (Read 4552 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

philminotti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
    • View Profile
Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI
« on: June 30, 2013, 03:03:32 PM »
Currently I have my fuel supply as shown in the "unbalanced" schematic, with the fuel rails in series.  It worked fine on my test stand which is not a dyno, and as such is unloaded.
For a presumed 550-600hp, should I switch to the balanced or parallel arrangement.  My injection is multiport, sequential.

Thanks
Phil
« Last Edit: June 30, 2013, 03:05:55 PM by philminotti »

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2013, 05:26:19 PM »
What is the ID of the fuel rails, and how big is your fuel pump?  You should have no problem running the fuel rails in series if you have decent size fuel lines and a good pump.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

philminotti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
    • View Profile
Re: Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2013, 05:33:27 PM »
I'm running -6 lines from an Aeromotive A1000 pump.  Not sure what the i.d. of the rails is but it's probably about 3/4" IIRC.

Thanks Jay

jayb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
    • View Profile
    • FE Power
Re: Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2013, 06:42:21 PM »
Hmmmm, #6 is pretty small, Phil.  The pump is fine, and the fuel rails sound like they are fine, but I would consider upgrading to at least #8 lines.  I usually run #10 for an EFI setup.
Jay Brown
- 1969 Mach 1, Drag Week 2005 Winner NA/BB, 511" FE (10.60s @ 129); Drag Week 2007 Runner-Up PA/BB, 490" Supercharged FE (9.35 @ 151)
- 1964 Ford Galaxie, Drag Week 2009 Winner Modified NA (9.50s @ 143), 585" SOHC
- 1969 Shelby Clone, Drag Week 2015 Winner Modified NA (Average 8.98 @ 149), 585" SOHC

   

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4227
    • View Profile
Re: Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2013, 07:19:53 PM »
I run #8 and put a fuel damper on one rail but run in series.

I don't see any reason you need the more complicated design, especially at your power level

---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

philminotti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
    • View Profile
Re: Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2013, 08:28:39 PM »
Thanks guys.  I've been planning to upgrade to PTFE hose anyway.  The wife is getting a bit tired of the fuel smell in the garage.

My427stang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4227
    • View Profile
Re: Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2013, 07:22:41 AM »
Another thing to look at is hard line, I ran hard line from tank to engine compartment in the stock location, then mirrored it on the other side for a return. 
---------------------------------
Ross
Bullock's Power Service, LLC
- 70 Fastback Mustang, 489 cid FE, Victor, SEFI, Erson SFT cam, TKO-600 5 speed, 4.11 9 inch.
- 71 F100 shortbed 4x4, 461 cid FE, headers, Victor Pro-flo EFI, Comp Custom HFT cam, 3.50 9 inch

cammerfe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1676
    • View Profile
Re: Balanced versus unbalanced fuel supply for EFI
« Reply #7 on: July 08, 2013, 10:41:53 AM »
If you switch to parallel there'll be no question. I agree that it's probably all right, but you may need more than -6. Do it so there'll no longer be any question. -10 and using a -8 return and there'll not be any basis for 'what if...'

KS