I have BBMs on my mild 390 with a little 224* roller, and I have a set of TFS sitting here as well....maybe a back to back is in order
I guess I don't see where the debate is, TFS flows more through a smaller port for $600 less. I don't know enough to know if somehow wet flow is horrible on the TFS, or if they stall early (every indication is they're fine for most hydraulic roller combos that aren't 500ci+), but doesn't seem like it's an issue as they seem to dyno in line with expectations.
Any BBM/Edelbrock that can run with them is being ported which brings the port energy into question as they're already larger. As stated, I'm sure there are applications where the air speed gets too high with the TFS and a larger port would work better, does anyone know how much the TFS can be opened? My understanding is TFS is usually pretty good about leaving meat in the ports. I know it's sort of unchartered territory to go grinding on CNC'd heads, but small block guys do it all the time.