Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 65Bird

Pages: [1]
1
FE Technical Forum / Re: How restrictive are the stock logs really?
« on: March 18, 2019, 02:11:20 PM »
Sorry--I should have specified that this is strictly a street car.  No engine rebuild in the plans.  Also--I used the intake/heads example to gauge the futility of trying to make more grunt using the stock logs.  From the responses thus far, I'm getting the distinct impression that without headers, I shouldn't bother with any engine mods other than a re-curved distributor.  And I'm perfectly fine with that--guess I was hoping for an easy way out ;D
 

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: How restrictive are the stock logs really?
« on: March 18, 2019, 08:42:44 AM »
Thanks!  I think the other brand you're thinking about is FPA.  But those headers are also the source of some frustration in the Tbird community--requiring shimming of the motor mounts etc.  I gather the fit is so tight the install is best done with the engine out of the car--and even then modifications are required.  Sounds like an enormous PITA!  Guess I'm questioning the potential reward

3
FE Technical Forum / How restrictive are the stock logs really?
« on: March 18, 2019, 06:45:22 AM »
Greetings all--new to the forum and to the FE.  Subject line pretty much sums up my question.  Given all of the horror stories I've heard and read regarding header fitment on a Thunderbird, I'd really prefer to stick with the stock exhaust manifolds and have a proper 2 1/2" exhaust system with h-pipe built for the car.  BUT-- since so many folks here and elsewhere believe the stock logs are such a choke point--I wonder if they would largely negate the impact of installing an upgraded intake like the RPM and a decent set of heads, even with a free flowing exhaust from the manifolds back?  I'd appreciate any and all insight!

Pages: [1]