Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - FESCJ

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
FE Technical Forum / Re: Factory 69 Cobra exhaust?
« on: February 16, 2024, 01:35:28 PM »
I wanted to respond to the questions regarding AP/Goerlich exhaust quick. Yes, I know that AP/Goerlich was huge back in the day as well as now. From the info that I'm receiving, I think AP was much more of an aftermarket company until they purchased Arvin and Maremont. Arvin and Maremont gave them a long list of exhaust assembly plants and allowed AP to begin manufacturing oem assembly plant systems. I am an older past Ford dealership master mechanic, and I remember looking under the first few 1992 Crown Vic's which had a strange looking muffler that AP produced. Ford continued using that same muffler on all Crown Vic's (less Marauders) until the Crown Vic was retired. So, I think AP plays a large roll in current oem exhaust production, but not in the 60's or 70's.......or even the 80's. AP was large, and they produced exhaust, shock absorbers, and many other components!

Interesting to note that AP produced an aftermarket muffler called the Golden Ram. It was painted gold ( imagine that) and looked virtually like an original Thrush. In addition, the Goerlich division of AP produced a muffler called the Roadrunner..........another Thrush look alike painted red. The Roadrunner mufflers were actually produced in Defiance, Ohio at the old Compo muffler plant which has been long closed.I suspect that many other mufflers and pipes that AP marketed were produced at the Compo Defiance plant.

I feel certain now that Walker was the primary supplier to GM/Chevy. I still have no idea about AMC or Chrysler in the day, but I suspect Arvin/Maremont/Walker?

There are plenty of holes in what I suspect with regard to oem exhaust systems. I'm trying to fill the gaps.......because I truly enjoy doing this. I can also now say with much certainty that Arvin was Fords main supplier for literally decades. I spoke with someone literally this week that knows for sure.

Just having fun,

Thx,
Brian N

2
FE Technical Forum / Re: Factory 69 Cobra exhaust?
« on: February 16, 2024, 06:43:16 AM »
No, there is nothing online about my car other than a few short past postings on this forum, but I'll be glad to tell you a bit about it. The car is a 69 Cobra formal roof clone. I chose in this case to build a clone because I could option the car the way I would have ordered it in 69. I have a 428 built to SCJ spec's ready to go in along with C6 trans. The car is awaiting minor "finish" bodywork and paint at this time. I will be using the factory oil cooler setup along with a 9 inch 3.91 rear. Trying to decide on paint and leaning towards Presidential Blue.

I had a 69 Cobra sports roof as my first car back in 1979. Loved that car and I wanted to get back to my roots after playing around with Mustang's for many years.I'm really looking forward to getting it done. I wish I could supply a picture as it currently sits before paint, but the car is in a storage bag in the garage considering the winter.

Thanks for the interest!

Brian N

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: Factory 69 Cobra exhaust?
« on: February 13, 2024, 03:46:32 PM »
Hey there, and I appreciate all of the response!

I suspected that Arvin was the originall equipment supplier to the assembly plants by virtue of the fact that Arvin provided Ford with the "Arvinode" exhaust system on 63/65 Fairlanes as well as early 64/65 Mustang Hipo models. I must say that I am am far away from knowing everything.........thus asking on this excellent forum.

Walker was large in the exhaust world, but again, I suspect they were tied to GM. I mean, the Walker chamber pipe muffling system for 69 Chevelle and Camaro.

Here is what I believe with very little other than what I've suggested to support it;

Ford, Long time Arvin supplier

Chevy/GM, Walker with maybe a secondary source

AMC, whatever was cheap???

Chrysler, two exhaust companies that I have no info on yet. Possibly a combination of Arvin and Walker or even Maremont?

Thanks much,
Brian N

4
FE Technical Forum / Re: Factory 69 Cobra exhaust?
« on: February 12, 2024, 02:40:14 PM »
Thanks for your response! Yes, AP/Goerlich was a huge supplier, but I think much more in later years? I was a master mechanic at a Ford dealership for 32 years starting in 1986 to 2018. I never saw much of anything exhaust wise that would have lead me to think Arvin, AP/Goerlich or anything else.

I know that Arvin was in the loop by virtue of their "Arvinode" systems for Fairlane and Mustang in the mid 60's. Other than that, I only have assumptions based on what I just said.

I suspect.......and only suspect that Arvin was the primary supplier? Ok, reasons being that by the mid to late 60's they had several exhaust plants in several states. I suspect again, that this removed them or superseded them from having a secondary supplier? If they had several plants making factory exhaust, why worry?

All of this is conjecture, I am WAY away from being an expert and would never attempt it. Just a curious thought

Thank you,
Brian N

5
FE Technical Forum / Factory 69 Cobra exhaust?
« on: February 12, 2024, 10:31:16 AM »
I am restoring a 69 Cobra formal roof car and I have wondered who the original exhaust supplier to Ford was in the 60's and 70's? I mean, I am aware that Arvin was involved with this, but I am not certain they were the principle supplier? In addition, who was the secondary supplier of which Ford certainly had?

Just curious about this. Any thoughts?

Thx, Brian

6
FE Technical Forum / Re: Thoughts on FE block?
« on: August 01, 2023, 05:06:11 AM »
I appreciate the responses! To answer a few questions, there is no part number/engiNeering number on the block. I've never known service blocks to have that. The block is externally ribbed, no scratch on the back, and has date code of Dec 17th, 1971. And yes, I think the easiest thing to do at this point is the drill bit test which I will do. Engine is not yet in the car making anything I do much easier.

In my mind the numbers don't really add up. I mean, I asked this guy to build me a 428. If the block was standard bore 390 when he started, he only needed to go .080 for standard 428. Even if it was .030 over, he still only had to go .050. Were the bores really that bad to bore as far as he did? This is based on it being a 390. He used decent parts in building this engine, Scat crank, Probe pistons, and I sent him a set of Lemans rods. It would be hard for me to imagine him building an engine that he didn't expect to live?

Brian

7
FE Technical Forum / Thoughts on FE block?
« on: July 31, 2023, 03:39:33 AM »
Several years ago I had a "faux" 428SCJ built for a 69 Mach 1 Drag Pack clone. The engine builder was based in Arizona and had good feedback, seemed to know what he was doing. Keep in mind that this was before I knew that there was an FE power forum or any other related forum. Anyway, a while after I received the engine, I decided to trade out the stock oil pan for the Milodon deep sump SS style pan. I thought it was a good idea considering I was gonna run the oil cooler. When I had ordered the engine, the builder gave me the choice of an original service block or a mirror block. I chose the service block. So, I go to replace the pan only to find that once removed, the block was non reinforced. I tried contacting the builder whom is now out of business or retired. I have little doubt that this block is a 390 service block. I know that Ford made many different iterations of these blocks in standard or service block form. I guess there is a possibility that this block was conceived as a non reinforced 428 service block, but I find that unlikely. The pistons he used are Probe 428 .030 over. I am somewhat surprised at this, I mean if it is a true 390 service block, not sure why it wouldn't have machined to 428 standard bore? Anyway, for good or bad, this is the block that I have. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated! Thx, Brian

8
Private Classifieds / Original FE rods for sale!
« on: January 08, 2023, 03:07:23 PM »
I have several loose original FE rods for sale. I will list out;

1. 4 C6AE-C rods with 3/8ths bolts

2. 2 C7AE-B rods with 3/8ths bolts

3. 1 C3AE-C rod with 3/8ths bolts.

Nice unmolested rods that have not been drilled for 13/32 bolts. No damage, nice!

Also, some 428 pistons if someone is interested?

1. 6 428 Super pistons, later CJ standard bore.

2. 2 428CJ early pistons standard bore.

The rods are $20 each plus the ride. Discounted if someone buys the rod lot.

The pistons are free less the ride. I will say that some pistons have a few dings. But, they are not cracked in anyway. Probably nice for display or possibly useable.

Items that I am looking for;

1. 390 2V and 4V pistons. Original Ford/TRW pistons which I would use for display. one of each piston.

2. C3AE-C rod with 13/32nd bolts. Just one.

3. C6AE-C rod with 13/32nd bolts. Just one.

The items that I am looking for are for a Ford FE display that I continue working on.

For any questions or info feel free to call me or text direct! Pictures are available upon request.

Thanks much,
Brian N
614-563-4311

9
FE Technical Forum / 1969 Torino Cobra body work?
« on: December 17, 2022, 02:33:30 PM »
Hello folks! I apologize if I've put this under an incorrect topic, but it seemed my best choice. Ok, I have a 69 Torino Cobra formal roof car I'm restoring. The 428 engine is done and I'm currently finishing up things with the C6 trans. I am having a terrible time finding anyone willing to do the body work on this car. I am located in central Ohio and virtually everyone I've contacted so far prefers to do collision work. My car needs to be smoothed out for paint, all rust repair is done and was nicely done. The body as the car stands is not bad, but again will need some work. At last count I've spoken with about 25 places in central Ohio or in Ohio in general. Would anyone have any suggestions? I would prefer to stay within Ohio. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thx, Brian

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: Trans crossmember?
« on: September 09, 2021, 07:50:00 AM »
Thanks so much for all the pictures, really helps! My crossmember is a close match to both fairlaniac and C8OZ as pictured. The only difference is that mine doesn't have the four oval openings on the bottom, just the two for the insulator nuts. I also found another one in the attic that is very close but does not have the reinforcement plate on the bottom side with the oval holes. It seems that there were several iterations of this crossmember through it's production life, and I wouldn't be surprised by that.

I'm gonna go ahead and try what I have and see how it works.

Thanks again,
Brian N

11
FE Technical Forum / Re: Trans crossmember?
« on: September 08, 2021, 11:35:14 AM »
The picture that fairlaniac posted of his crossmember looks very close to the one I have. I appreciate the picture!


I suspect my best move is to wait and do the engine/trans install and see how things line up. I try to be proactive when I can.........sometimes it works, other times it does not. If I had one that I knew was specifically for a big block car, well, that would be great!

Again, thx much guys!

Brian N

12
FE Technical Forum / Re: Trans crossmember?
« on: September 08, 2021, 11:20:08 AM »
I appreciate the responses! I am referring to a 69 Fairlane/Torino Cobra. It appears per the Ford MPC that all big block Fairlanes/Comets/Cyclones/Torino's used the same transmission crossmember for years 1966 to 1969. Part numbers change with 302 or 351 car. I really wish Ford had stamped these with an engineering number.

Thanks for everyones help!

Brian N


13
FE Technical Forum / Trans crossmember?
« on: September 08, 2021, 08:19:32 AM »
I am (still slowly) restoring a 69 Cobra hardtop clone. I bought from a 69 Cobra parts car what I believed to be the correct transmission crossmember..........I simply assumed it was since it was in the trunk. I am now virtually certain that it is a small block crossmember and obviously someone had a small block in this Cobra parts car at one time.

Could someone please show me a picture of the correct 66/69 big block FE/C6 crossmember? I cannot find a correct, or what I believe to be a correct picture. I have also heard that some of these crossmembers can be installed reverse and made to work?

Thanks much!

Brian N

14
FE Technical Forum / 69 Torino Cobra front sway bar bushings?
« on: April 24, 2021, 09:55:08 AM »
Restoring a clone 69 Torino Cobra formal roof car. I will be using correct 15/16ths front sway bar and two piece drop brackets. Can anyone give me part number ( good aftermarket number ) for correct bushing? I've tried what Moog had listed, did not work. So, I just randomly matched up some Moog bushings which are close. Well, with two piece bracket in place with bushings on the bar, there will be a little squeeze but not much. When I slam the original part number into the system ( C9OZ5493A), most listings come back as indirect. When I check old MPC, doesn't look like this bushing was used for much other than 69 Torino with 15/16ths bar. So, I imagine most companies condensed the part number to something close to the originals? I'll use what I have if I must, but, any thoughts would be appreciated. I do not wish to go with an aftermarket bar and brackets. Thx!

15
Private Classifieds / WTB; 69 Mustang/Torino FE oil cooler parts, etc!
« on: January 12, 2021, 02:11:13 PM »
Working on a "clone" 69 Torino SCJ car and need a few items. If anyone has a damaged or leaking ( drag Pack) oil cooler assy, I would be interested. In addition, upper and lower oil cooler brackets. The upper bracket is 69 Torino specific, but lower bracket is same as Mustang. Again, a clone car, these do not need to be concours parts. I will consider any and all!

Also, a decent used 3.89 ring/pinion for 9 inch. I usually hesitate on used, but, on this forum, I would trust the parts.

Thx,
Brian N

Pages: [1] 2 3