Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mlcraven

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14
1
On two occasions of running 2.5-in pipes through approximately stock under-chassis routing and tailpipe exit locations (in an 80 El Camino and a 67 Cyclone) the fit was VERY tight, especially going over the axle tubes and out the back.  I imagine with 3-in tube it would be a first-class exercise in frustration.  But Freiburger's zip-tie philosophy is not in the least bounded by such old-fashioned constraints.

As someone who messed with more than his fair share of thrashed muscle cars back in the day, I can't think of many -- if any at all -- that had pipes bigger than two and a quarter inch diameter.  But they weren't making 600 hp either, most realistically only about half to two thirds that amount.

2
Thanks for that, a very poignant look back at an era when corporate values were more extensive, diversified and locally focused than in our present 'free trade' age.

3
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: For the Bracket Racers
« on: February 25, 2016, 08:33:44 PM »
I've always found Jok Nicholson's views and perspective thoughtful, this column no less so. 

For better or worse, bracket racing is like most (if not all) motorsports -- as the technology evolves and the prize money goes up, the low-bucks operator gets squeezed out and the big player has to seek every possible advantage at ever increasing expense.  Then the sanctioning body makes an effort to level the field and...presto!...pretty soon you have NASCAR's 'car of tomorrow' and drag racing main events that struggle to attract 16-car fields with race cars (funny cars, at any rate) that all look like anal suppositories.

Human nature at work I think..and the inevitable consequence of the engineering tendency to achieve homogeneity of design in the pursuit of perfection. 

4
Well who knew...I'm a side-oiler owner too!  Cool.   8)

5
FE Technical Forum / Re: This will warm you up on a cold snowy night!
« on: January 24, 2016, 11:03:06 AM »
Musical!

6
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: The Golden Era of Romance
« on: January 21, 2016, 06:43:45 PM »
Nicely put. Your thoughts and observations channel my own when it comes to older cars, which for the most part I define as pre-5 mph bumper vehicles. Although I have little patience for outright reliability or safety issues, lesser idiosyncrasies are something that increasingly bother me less and less.  It makes the hobby more affordable too!

7
Member Projects / Re: Why not?
« on: January 08, 2016, 10:43:09 PM »
I loved my '66 Falcon wagon with the 428 and 390 and toploader.  Would love to find another to build.

haha...was the 390 in the back and 428 in front?  (sorry, couldn't resist)

8
Member Projects / Re: Why not?
« on: January 08, 2016, 10:34:10 PM »
No reason "why not", particularly if it's in relatively decent structural condition to begin with.  Old (pre-73) wagons are amazingly practical, look good, mark their owners as iconoclasts unafraid to step away from the '2-door hardtop or nothing' mentality that afflicts our hobby, and -- properly set up -- do surprisingly well at the drag strip. 

Go for it.  I'm sure most of us here will happily advise you on how to spend your money   ;D 

9
Nice looking machine...but I'm confused.  Was the Marauder its own car, or an option package on the Montclair, or on the Monterray?

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: From The thread Head choices: Okay rate the heads
« on: December 06, 2015, 09:53:40 AM »
Not in quite the same manner (1 to 5 rating), but seem to recall Barry R's book gives an assessment of the various head choices.

11
Private Classifieds / Re: 1967 headlight hdwr
« on: December 05, 2015, 10:15:21 PM »
I was informed by a number of Blue Oval enthusiasts with experience at the old Norfolk assembly plant that Ford was notorious for changing small parts/fastener suppliers part-way through production runs, especially if they could get the part cheaper and increase profit. Accordingly, not unusual to have multiple parts suited for the same job, especially for small stuff like this.

As you have already indicated, if concours is NOT the objective and you are only striving for functionality, a solution is to use plastic or nylon threaded body inserts re-shaped on the bench grinder as required to fit the application.  This worked a treat on the 67 Mercury. It goes without saying, buy the inserts in bulk from a jobber instead of paying the rip-off (insert auto parts store name here) prices for one-sies and two-sies.

12
Well done to your son...that's a fine-looking piece of work. A bright future looms for the lad, I daresay!

13
Howie: the 70 Mach 1 I owned for a short period had a 351C 4V with the shaker scoop; I'm quite certain it was the original engine.  A very quick car which easily thrashed a 71 340 Duster and a 70 Chevelle SS with a 325 horse 396.  Almost, but not quite, as quick as a 69 CJ 428 Cougar in the stable at the same time (late-70s).  Unfortunately, like so many northern cars it was beyond restoration and therefore junked for parts.  Today's restorers would be elated to find a car in similar condition.

14
Member Projects / Re: My '63 Mercury Wagon 390 build
« on: November 21, 2015, 10:47:57 PM »
Keeper! Going to be following this project.  You keeping the faux wood treatment? (pretty please!!!!, let the answer be yes)

15
Fine looking automobiles, those 66 Galaxies. Excellent and very informative video -- he goes driving at min 29.  Would be interesting to know what the total investment is in a project like this.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14