Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Kevin66

Pages: [1]
1
Non-FE Discussion Forum / One problem after another! Need help, please.
« on: January 04, 2021, 04:29:18 AM »
So I've posted on here before about issues my nephew has had with his '66 Ranchero. I talked with him a little while ago, as he just got back to port after a few months away. I'm hoping that some of you guys will take the time to read through this story and offer some good suggestions, because I'm about out of ideas! Sorry that this will be long-winded, but I thought it important that you have all the info if I'm going to ask for your opinions/help.
He's got a completely rebuilt 289 (<500 miles), a good built C4 (3,000 RPM stall converter), and a 4.00 9" posi. The engine has about 9.6:1 c.r., with KB pistons, Pro Comp 175cc cylinder heads, Tri-Y headers, a Lunati Voodoo hydraulic (non-roller) with 227/233 @ .050", .522"/.538" Lift, and a 110 LSA, a Weiand Stealth intake, with a Speed Demon 650 VS carb. Until recently it had a HP289 distributor with a Pertronix III module, and their matching super-low ohm coil, Accel 8.8mm spiral wound plug wires, and Autolite racing 3924's gapped at .035".

In general driving, it seems to run great. Off-idle, mid-range and full power are everything he could want! From a standing start it will boil his 235/60's all the way through low gear until the speed catches up to the engine RPM around 5,000, then it continues to pull hard out past 6,000 RPM. I've never felt or heard a stumble or any hesitation while out driving with him. But there are problems. Gas mileage is dismal, around 8 mpg he said on the last tankful, and the engine refuses to idle properly, despite trying several things to improve a persistent 'roll' in speed.

Thinking that the virtually new BG carb could be at fault, I took it apart for him and looked everything over. I didn't find anything to point a finger at, but re-set the transition slot exposure to the recommended 'square' (.020") on all four throttle blades, and set the 4-corner idle mixture screws to 1.0 turn out for starters. I also dropped Pri & Sec jet sizes by 2 numbers (now 68/76, from the factory 70/78), installed a new 6.5 power valve, and re-checked the float levels to be at half on the sight windows.
Back on the car, things continued pretty much as before. After adjusting the idle speed and mixture screws, the engine idled with a maximum of about 12 inches of vacuum (though often at 10), dropping down to about maybe 8 for a second or so as the idle speed rolled. If I tried to reduce the idle speed much below 1,000 RPM, it would roll worse. It would stay running like that for 5+ minutes in Park, but in gear (at about 800 RPM) it would die after no more than a couple minutes. If I watched the tach while idling, what I would see wasn't a 'flutter' (like a misfire), but rather a quick, sharp drop down to about the 500 RPM range for a half-second or so as the engine rolled, then it would rebound.
I checked the fuel pressure, and it was about 6.5 PSI. If I 'deadheaded' the gauge, by disconnecting the carb from the gas line and plugging just the gauge in, pressure would slowly climb to an indicated 10+ PSI. So I got him to buy and install a pressure regulator, and we set it at 6 PSI, then again set the float levels.

If we pulled the cap off of the manifold vacuum port on the carb at idle, it would speed-up and smooth out somewhat. This suggested that the engine was running rich. In an attempt to get the idle speed down and smoother, I closed the secondary throttle blades so that the transition slots were no longer exposed. This did virtually nothing, so I tried turning the secondary idle mixture screws right in, and adjusting the idle on the primary ones only. This produced a little better idle, but you had to 'put your foot further into the gas pedal' to accelerate while cruising.

This carb has Demon's 'Idle-Eze' adjustment under the air cleaner stud, but it didn't seem to do anything for either idle speed or smoothness. So, frustrated with all this work but no real improvement, I removed the BG carb and installed a new 600 cfm Holley that a friend had. To my dismay, after checking/making all the usual adjustments, the idle still rolled with this carb!

So I'm thinking 'fuel & spark' are the two important things, and decided to look at the ignition. But before doing that, I pulled the plugs (sooty black, as from running rich, not oil fouled, etc.) I did a compression test, and got 160 readings from all eight cylinders. I then verified the 14-degrees initial timing, and the 32 total with 18 in the distributor. Not seeing anything there to indicate a problem, I went back to the carburetor.

He had a 600 cfm Edelbrock carb that was on the car when he got it. Although it had now sat for years, I gave it a try. At first the accelerator pump wasn't working, but once I got the engine running for a few moments, it came around. I found that I could drop the idle speed down to about 800 RPM, and adjusted the idle mixture screws. It seemed to be a little better than the BG carb, but still had that roll to it. Aaarrggghh!

I decided to try bumping the initial timing up a little, to 18-degrees. It was while doing this that I saw something unusual. I now had 14 & 18-degree marks on the dampener, and you could clearly see them under the timing light. But frequently they seemed to 'dance around' a bit, and would then go back to what you expected to see. The #5 cylinder plug boot came close enough to its header tube that it had started to melt, so I'd suggested he install a 6" length of that thermal protective sleeving. I decided we should check that cylinder, to ensure that there wasn't any misfiring going on with it. Simple enough to do, just put the timing light's inductive pickup on the #5 wire and watch the light flash...nice and steady. But then I saw something unexpected. When I turned the light back towards the dampener, I could sometimes see those same two 14 & 18-degree marks (for #1 cylinder) showing up under the light! How could that be, as the two are spaced well apart in the 1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8 firing order?? I checked the #6 plug wire, and saw the same thing. Then I went to the other bank of the engine, and checked cylinder #4, only to again see those same 14 & 18-degree marks under the light sometimes...????

So we then removed the distributor and Pertronix ignition components, going right back to 'dirt simple', with an Accel dual-point distributor, Taylor plug wires, and a 'no-name' aftermarket coil. The car started instantly, and I set the timing up to 18-degrees initial, but that was not before noticing something else. As the engine idled, you could visibly see current jumping from the coil's hi-tension tower over to either of the coil '+' & '-' terminals?? This was despite the thick boot on the hi-tension lead. I had never seen this happen before, but wanted to see if I could get it to stop. So I cut a couple 1" pieces of 1/4" rubber gas line, slit the lower end, and pressed them over the coil terminals. Despite this additional insulation, the shorting continued, but then stopped after a minute or two. How could a points-based ignition have so much current at the coil that it had to find a way to dissipate by shorting to a ground?? The one good thing was that you were no longer seeing those #1 cylinder timing marks show up on any of the other cylinders!

After being thoroughly warmed up, the engine would idle at 800+ RPM, but still had a roll to it. Again, thoroughly frustrated with a lack of progress, and one inexplicable issue after another, we replaced that points distributor with a new Duraspark distributor and an MSD 6A box and coil. I re-installed the Speed Demon carburetor, having decided that if it wasn't doing anything the other two weren't, it wasn't likely the problem. I set the initial timing back at 18 degrees, brought the engine up to 180 degrees, and tried adjusting the idle. This time, I could get it to idle as low as about 600 RPM, but not with the kind of regularity and smoothness that you'd expect from an engine with good compression and a 'fairly' mild cam in it. I could only get a decent idle in gear with all four of the mixture screws set at about 3/4 of a turn out. Any less, and the speed would falter; any more and the roll would be worse. Engine vacuum and fuel pressure readings are the same as before.

Since it'd only been driven a few hundred miles for break-in and trying to resolve some issues, like this idling thing, he wasn't that worried about what appeared to be dismal gas mileage, writing much of it off to prolonged idling periods and trips around the block. But when our recent torrential rains finally stopped for a while the other day, we decided to take it for a longer drive, both to see how everything behaved, and to actually check the mileage. I'm not liking what we came up with!

We topped up the tank with 94-octane premium, and went straight out on the highway to a nearby town. 3,000 RPM with his 25.25" rear tires gets 56 MPH, which is where we cruised. After getting there, he did about a two mile lap up and down the main street of the town at about 30 MPH, then it was back on the highway again. Once back in our city, we refilled the gas tank again. It took 5.64 gallons to do that. Then we get to the confusing part, and the real problem.
I know his speedometer reads low. Where it should be indicating that 56 MPH on the highway, it only shows about 51, suggesting that it's off by about 10%. I reasoned that if the speedo was under-reading, the odometer probably was too. When we had refilled the tank, it was indicating that we'd gone 48 miles since starting out. But his Garmin GPS unit only showed 38.5 miles? So first off, this suggests the odometer was actually over-reading??
If we divide the 48 miles that the odometer showed, by the 5.64 gallons, it comes out to a whopping 8.5 MPG!?!? Even more pathetic, if we use the GPS figure of only 38.5 miles, and divide that by the same 5.64 gallons, it comes to only 6.82 MPG...??? How could a mechanically good 289, with moderate performance improvements, get that dismal mileage while under light cruising loads??

We checked thoroughly for any gas leaks, right from the tank forward, including gas somehow dumping into the engine/oil, and we see nothing. There is no smell of gas, either when the car is under way, or when it's sitting. There is a bit of a stronger odour when the car is idling, but it's not 'eye watering'. The power and acceleration while driving are great, with no bogs, surging, or any other problems above idle. There's no obvious drag, such as brakes not releasing, and the C4 is working great, shifting up and down just as it should. Has anyone else experienced anything like this? Anybody have a guess as to what is wrong here?

As I mentioned initially, I'm frustrated and stymied here. I have no idea what the problem really is, nor how to fix it. Sorry for such a long-winded post, but I thought it was important you have all this information. If anyone has dealt with this kind of an issue before, or has a good suggestion to offer, I'd be glad to hear it!

2
Non-FE Discussion Forum / C4 issues - any experts out there?
« on: February 01, 2020, 04:35:21 AM »
Well, I'm back to trying to help my nephew again with his '66 289 Ranchero. This time it's a problem with his C4 transmission, and being a 4-speed man, it's not something I'm all that familiar with. Here's the story.

When he got the Ranchero, the transmission had no high gear in it. On inspection, there was no lining left on the direct drum clutches, and the others weren't much better. It needed a complete rebuild. They knew the transmission wasn't original to the Ranchero, as it was a 4-speed car from the factory. The tag on the transmission said PEE 289 6M8 B2. That date code '6M8' (Dec. 8th, 1966) suggested it was likely a '67 transmission, but several of the parts inside were dated earlier.

A friend of his, who had rebuilt a few GM transmissions, did the C4 for him. He gathered advice from several Mustang and other SBF forums, from a couple racers, from the shop manual and other books, and from YouTube. He got a good rebuild kit from Oregon Performance Transmission, which included Alto clutches and plates, Kevlar bands, the Alto reverse/high 'Power Pack' six clutch disc kit, and a TransGo 47-2 shift kit.

When it came to installing that Transgo kit, they found a couple odd things in the valve body.  The first was that the boost valve and bushing had been installed backwards, according to the TransGo instruction sheets. Similarly, there was a flat-sided disc or 'puck' there that wasn't in the instructions, and a spring that should have been there had been replaced with a check ball. Lastly, TransGo had provided a .110" drill bit and wanted a specific hole in the valve body separator plate drilled out. What they found was that the hole had already been drilled out...but more like .250"! 

When the rebuilt 289 engine was fired to break-in the cam/lifters, after the obligatory 20+ minutes at 2,000-2,500 RPM, they dropped the engine to idle and topped-off the transmission fluid (ATI Super F synthetic). The rear axle had been lifted on jack stands, so that the tires cleared the ground. The trans was moved into Reverse, and the tires rotated backwards as they should. Then they put the transmission in low gear, and again the rear tires were rotating as they should. The revs were brought up to about 2,000, and the trans was shifted into 2nd gear, and the shift went quickly and smoothly. After about 30 seconds, it was shifted into high gear, and again it shifted quickly and smoothly. This was repeated a few times over the next couple of days, as they dealt with some issues about timing and idle mixture/speed.

At some later point, the engine was run again in gear, and the RPM's were brought up. As the speedometer indicated they were aproaching 50 MPH in High, the transmission seemed to literally 'fall out of gear'. The speed fell off, but the engine RPM remained the same. Only by letting the engine speed drop down could they get the transmission to re-engage. But again as speed got up to about 50 MPH (less than 3,000 RPM in High), the transmission disengaged again, and it has continued to do that ever since.

Asking some friends got them the suggestion that they install a pressure gauge, to see what was going on in the transmission. Fluid levels were again checked, and in fact indicated that it was slightly over-full. On running the engine, they saw 95-100 PSI at idle in Park. Shifting into Low they got the same reading, from idle up to 2,500 rpm or so. And again, in both 2nd and High, the indicated pressure was right around 100 PSI. In Reverse, pressure went up to about 165 PSI. Of course, this was with virtually no load on the engine, so the vacuum level did not drop appreciably.

At the moment, I'm leaning towards suspecting the valve body, given that the pump seems to be putting out at a good level. But as I said, I'm no expert. Any other thoughts about what could be going on? Thanks for any insight here.

3
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Need help from auto electrical gurus
« on: November 16, 2019, 11:20:33 PM »
Trying to help my nephew again, on his '66 289 Ranchero. The problem he's having is that the engine begins cranking the instant the key is turned even slightly towards the 'Run' position...nowhere near over to the 'Crank' position...and then it won't stop cranking, even when the key is moved to 'Off'!

What's really puzzling is that everything worked fine for several weeks, and then just appeared one day. The starter (Denso hi-torque mini) was new, as were the battery, cables (including solenoid to starter), solenoid, alternator, regulator and ignition switch. The battery has been kept fully charged. The ignition system is a Pertronix III module in a Ford 289HP distributor, and the recommended Pertronix low-ohm coil. A Pertronix relay routes full 12V power to the coil, just using the factory wiring to activate the relay.

We've tried disconnecting the battery ground cable when this starter run-on  happens, and of course the cranking stops immediately. It also stops when the small red/blue wire is removed from the 'S' terminal on the starter solenoid. If we 'jump' the solenoid from the 12V input terminal over to the 'S' terminal...whether with the red/blue wire connected or not...the engine cranks. If the key is in the 'Run' position, the engine will start.

A lot of reading on forums seems to indicate that many people have this same issue, on a multitude of cars and trucks of all years. There does not seem to be any real consensus on solving this problem either. Frequent recommendations are to replace the starter, solenoid, or ignition switch. Yet many posters say the problem has persisted even with these new parts.

With the red/blue wire disconnected from the solenoid 'S' terminal, the engine can't be cranked with the ignition key. With that wire back on, and the brown 'I' terminal wire (ignition) disconnected, the engine won't crank until the key is moved all the way to the 'Crank' position. It stops cranking when the key is moved back to 'Off'. When the red/blue wire and the brown wire are swapped on the solenoid, the engine starts cranking in the run position, and won't stop.

The ignition switch has been replaced with yet another new one, but no difference. All wiring connected to it other than the factory 3-wire pigtail connector were removed, but still the starter run-on persists. I'm fresh out of ideas here, and would appreciate some input! Thanks if you got this far, and can help.

 

4
I am in the process of resurrecting a '66 Ranchero that's had a rather hard, neglected life. One of the many jobs involved completely replacing ALL of the brake stuff, from one end of the vehicle to the other. It has the 2.5"X 10" front drums, and 2" X 10" rear. New parts include drums, shoes, wheel cylinders, hardware kits, self adjuster mechanisms, all metal and rubber brake lines, fluid and master cylinder.

Originally, because I had a NOS one, I installed a 'single' master cylinder. New brake lines connected the one outlet port to the rear brakes, and the other port was routed to a Line Loc, and from there went to each of the front brakes. Problems began when we attempted to bleed the system. I did not 'bench bleed' the master cylinder because I've never needed to do that previously with this type of cylinder.

Starting at the rear end, the longest line was bled first. Only minimal 'spurts' of brake fluid came out, but eventually the air bubbles stopped. Next came the other rear brake (with identical results), and then the fronts. The passenger side was bled first (longest) and then the driver's side, again experiencing only minimal spurts of fluid, usually right near the end of each time the brake pedal was depressed to the floor.

When the bleeding was finished, and the master cylinder topped-up again, a press on the brake pedal revealed no resistance...the pedal could easily be pushed all the way to the floor. There was no evidence of any leakage around the master cylinder, nor at any of the four wheels. The master cylinder stayed full of fluid. It appeared that the master cylinder was defective...that pressure was leaking past the piston seals or something, so that it could only push some fluid out when there was no resistance, due to the open bleeder screws. As soon as the system was sealed up, it couldn't generate brake pressure.

At this point, I decided to replace that single cylinder with a 'new' Raybestos PG MC36222 cylinder...the dual-bowl one listed for '67-'70 Fords with drum brakes. This cylinder has same-sized bowls both front and rear. This time I followed the manufacturer's 'bench bleeding' instructions...but it did not go exactly as they indicated it should. They suggested that after clamping the cylinder in a vise (level) that the bowls be filled with new brake fluid, and you were to wait for fluid to begin dribbling from the outlet ports. Once this happened, you were to install the thread-in plugs they had supplied, and continue with bleeding. The problem was that after waiting more than ten minutes, no fluid was dribbling out??

I decided to try 'gentle' pressure on the pushrod, against the piston, partially depressing it maybe 1/2". A bit of fluid spurted out of the front port, so I installed the threaded plug there, and tightened it as Raybestos instructed. Applying more light pressure on the pushrod finally got a spurt from the rear ports, so that one too was plugged and tightened. The instructions then told you to press on the pushrod to depress the piston about 3/4"-1.0" several times, until you felt considerable resistance, and could only depress it about 1/8" total. I got to where it would only depress about 1/4", and figured that was as good as it was going to get. Leaving the plugs in place, I took the new cylinder over to the car.

New lines were again bent to connect things. Since I had no information that it really mattered which bowls was connected to front or rear brakes, I followed the usual for disc brake cars and ran the rear bowl to the front brakes, and the front bowl to the rears. I used proper reducers in the cylinder ports to accommodate the 1/8" fittings on the 3/16" brake lines. The brakes were again bled, following the long-to-short procedure again. This time, after some bubbles, there were stronger spurts of brake fluid from the rear brakes. The front ones however still seemed weak. When finished, I was both disappointed and frustrated to find that the pedal again went to the floor! It was pumped a half-dozen times, but continued to go to the floor each time.

At this point, I decided to reverse the lines, running the front bowl of the master cylinder to the front brakes, and the rear bowl to the rear brakes. Again, the pedal would go down to the floor, but did encounter some resistance for the last inch or so. A careful check of all lines, fittings and wheels still showed no evidence of any fluid leaks.

Deciding to try another tack, I removed and plugged the front brake line from the master cylinder, leaving the rear brakes connected to the rear bowl, and tried the brake pedal again. Ah-hah!...a firm pedal about halfway down to the floor! Just to cover all the bases, I removed the rear brake line from the rear bowl, plugged it into the front bowl, and plugged the rear one. Again, the pedal would go down a couple inches and then get very firm. Hhhmmm??

Wondering now how both ports could produce a firm pedal, as long as only the one pair of brakes was connected, I decided to join them. A short line was bent to run from the front master cylinder port to the rear port. This produced a 'rock hard' brake pedal that could only be pressed down about an inch. So it seemed that the master cylinder was indeed capable of generating fluid pressure, and that there were no internal leaks.

Removing that jumper line, I now connected the front brakes (with the Line Loc) to the front port of the master cylinder, and plugged the rear port. There was some resistance, but the brake pedal would still sink to the floor.

I moved the front brake line over to the rear port on the master cylinder, and plugged the front one. Similar results, with some resistance to pressing on the pedal encountered, but it would go down to the floor.

Sure now that there was something about the front brake setup creating the problem, I decided that the Line Loc must be the culprit. I removed it from the vehicle, and got an Aeroquip 3-way, reverse flare fitting. This connected the two front brake lines, and a short line over to the master cylinder port. Same results...the pedal would go to the floor, with some resistance, when pushed. I moved the front brake line to the other port on the master cylinder. Same results! Aaarrgghh!!

So all brake lines were removed from the master cylinder, and a short line and rubber hose were run to a collecting bottle. The brake pedal was slowly pumped (keeping the lower end of the rubber hose submerged under brake fluid so no air could enter), and after some 'minute' bubbling strong spurts of brake fluid were seen. That port was plugged, and the bleeder line and hose moved to the second port. A similar process showed it to have virtually no air, and good spurts of fluid were seen.

At this point, the bleeder line was removed and the rear brake line was threaded into that port. The other port remained plugged. When the brake pedal was pressed, considerable resistance was felt, and the pedal went nearly solid about 1+1/2" down! Thinking that the problem was finally rectified, I reconnected the front brake line to its port, and again pressed the pedal. It went all the way to the floor!

Thinking that the rear brakes were now working well, I again tried bleeding the front ones, only to have the same 'weak' spurts of fluid appear in the collection jar. The brake pedal felt and acted the same, going right down to about an inch off the floor before encountering any real resistance. Switching the front brake line to the other port on the master cylinder, and bleeding them again, produced the same results. Huh??

So the situation hasn't changed, even after removing the Line Loc and replacing it with a solid mechanical connection...the rear brakes are firm and hold fast no matter whether connected to the front or rear bowl of the master cylinder. The front brakes don't seem to work from either. If all the brakes are connected as they should be, the pedal goes to the floor, only encountering any real resistance in about the last inch or so. There is no evidence of brake fluid leaking at the master cylinder, anywhere along the steel or rubber brake lines, or from the wheel cylinders. It's as if with all the brakes in place the master cylinder can't develop any pressure. When you press the brake pedal, you get the usual 'geyser' of fluid spurting up out of the front bowl.

Needless to say, I'm extremely frustrated, confused, and fresh out of ideas what to try next! I'd appreciate hearing from anyone who has fought a similar battle, or perhaps knows what is at fault here. Thanks for listening.

Pages: [1]