Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Wreckless Warren

Pages: [1] 2
1
FE Technical Forum / Top Loader Output Yoke Weeping Gear Oil
« on: May 13, 2016, 07:42:15 AM »
Yesterday was fluids day on the P-Code project. Bled the brakes and gear oil in the rear end and transmission. Later, we were surprised to see a small spot of gear oil on the floor at the back of the trans and thought we had a seal problem but everything was dry in that area.

We used a plumb bob to locate where it was coming from and it is at the very back of the output yoke behind the u-joint. Is there a vent in the yoke there? ww

2
FE Technical Forum / Brad Penn vs Joe Gibbs Oil
« on: May 02, 2016, 07:22:45 PM »
I have used Brad Penn Oil for a long time but have not purchased any in a while. I see that DA Petroleum purchased Brad Penn a while back and it looks like their product has changed. Their multi-grade oils are semi-synthetic?

I'm hearing that Joe Gibbs Hot Rod mineral based oils are the ones to use with flat tappet cams. I used Brad Penn break-in oil for my new engine but I'm wondering what to use going forward, it has solid lifters.  Thanks. ww 

3
FE Technical Forum / Ready To Install
« on: April 17, 2016, 08:16:12 PM »
SCAT 445 with Diamond pistons, ED heads massaged by JDC, BT MR intake,  Comp 270S cam, POP/Harland Sharp rocker arm system, QF 600's, Tim O Conner distributor. Hope to have it sitting between the frame rails within the next week. Been a long time coming. ww



4
FE Technical Forum / Tube In Tube Drive Shaft
« on: April 16, 2016, 12:58:49 PM »
We are very close to installing the engine/trans in the 65 P-Code restoration so it was time to rehab the drive shaft. I've had it stowed away for the last 10 years but the 25+ years the car spent away from me were not kind to the drive shaft. Looks like it spent a long time on 4 flats.

I see the drive shaft is what's called a tube in tube with the inner tube  isolated from the outer tube with rubber. I wonder what condition that isolation material is in. I'm thinking I should have a new drive shaft made, I assume that would be a one piece. This is a 1965 Galaxie.

Your opinions please. ww

5
FE Technical Forum / Inital Tuning of Dual Holleys
« on: March 29, 2016, 07:29:28 PM »
I wanted to kick this out and get others experiences. I have my new 445 on the run stand and after some teething issues I'm going to start tuning the carbs. They are custom QF 600's on a BT Medium Riser intake, ED heads and a Comp 270S cam.

I have read over and over the FORD TSB's on setting up dual fours and it says on the bench to turn the secondary adjust screw in 1/2 turn on both carbs from a closed position and the primary adjuster in 3 turns from a closed position on both. Then turn in the idle air screws in till seated and then back out 1 1/2 turns. This is your base line setting.

But I have been talking to Joe D. Craine and Woods Allen about using the secondary throttles of both carbs for engine idle. With this method you adjust the secondary throttle blades on both carbs so 0.012-0.014" of the transfer slot is showing. The primary adjusters are set to a CLOSED position. The idle air screws are turned out 3/4 to 1 turn. This is your base line setting. If the idle needs to be adjusted up or down it is done by making small adjustments evenly to the secondary's of both carbs, the primaries remain closed at idle.

It was also discussed about the need for the throttle blades to be centered in the bores if not already.

Obviously this is a more time consuming process but eliminates the potential of activating the power valve circuit at idle, especially with big cams.

I'm going to set mine up like this tomorrow and get it dialed in. I was wondering if others are using this method and had anything to share. Thanks. ww

6
I was curious if there is any data on the effects the various factory FE cast iron exhaust manifolds have on power output. We are all familiar with the shorty and long tube cast iron exhaust manifolds. But it seems starting in 65 with the new Galaxie chassis and the unibodies of the Mustangs & Fairlanes the factory manifolds became more restrictive (except the 65-67 427 manifolds in the Galaxie).  Yet factory power ratings didn't seem to suffer?

Case in point is the 64-65 330 hp rated 390 Police Interceptor engine. I believe both engines are mechanically identical with the exception of the exhaust manifolds. The 64 used the shorty Hi-Po manifolds where the 65 used the same log (pancake) manifolds found on the 300hp 390 and the 250hp 352 (the shorty manifolds do not clear the 65 chassis configuration).

How could both engines have the same power output?

I was wondering if Jay (or anyone) had any data on this or had entertained doing some dyno comparisons of the various factory exhaust manifolds. ww

7
FE Technical Forum / Timing Curve With Vacuum Advance Distributor
« on: March 10, 2014, 02:07:10 PM »
I have a new MSD Ready To Run billet distributor with Vacuum Advance on the way. It will replace the MSD full centrif dist currently in my 445 with Ed heads and a Comp 294S cam. I'm currently running 16 deg of initial timing and I think it's set up with 38 deg total all in by 3K RPM. I will still run by MSD 6AL box and Blaster II coil.

MSD says the Vac Advance Dist will provide 10 deg of advance with 15" of vacuum. Do you think I will be able to retain the timing curve I have now with the new vac advance unit?

It currently runs 20" of vacuum at cruse and about 10-12 inches at idle  with a 50/50 mix of 93 octane pump gas and SUNOCO 110.

I know I'll have to tune to the new distributor but I was wondering what to expect. Thanks. ww

8
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Going To New PC
« on: February 24, 2014, 10:06:31 AM »
I just took delivery of a new tower PC with Windows 8.1 64, my old PC has Windows XP. What is the best way to transfer/copy my data? Besides the usual stuff, I want to copy all the music I have in Windows Media Player, dates and such in Outlook and my Web Favorites. I figure I'm not the only one dealing with this. Microsoft support is ending in April and Explorer is out of date so I needed to make the move. Any help is greatly appreciated. ww

9
FE Technical Forum / T-10 or Toploader 4-Speed Behind The FE
« on: January 28, 2014, 10:11:45 AM »
During data input for the FE Powerd Cars poll, most just listed a "4-Speed" if that was the transmission they have. While some specified either a T-10 or Top Loader. When did that change happen? When did Ford/Mercury stop using the T-10 behind the FE?

A similar question applies to lite trucks. F-100, F-150, F-250 and F-350 owners either specified a 4-Speed or a NP435 4-Speed. If it was a 4-Speed behind an FE in a lite truck in the late 60's & early 70's was it always a NP435 4-speed?  Was their another 4-Speed for that application?

I have 475 FE powered vehicles listed and I'm getting ready to close input and start crunching data. Thanks. ww

10
Non-FE Discussion Forum / List Your FE Powered Car at FORDFE.COM
« on: January 27, 2014, 12:38:44 PM »
I hope you don't take exception Jay, if this is inappropriate then lock or delete this thread.

I have a post going on over at the FE Forum about FE Powered Vehicles, it's called:

"List Your FE Powered Vehicles"

If your still a member over there and you would like, login and list your stuff.

This is limited to vehicles you currently own and are running or serious projects that will see completion.

Please list the Year, Make, Model, Engine, Transmission and your age.

I am compiling the information into an Excel Spreadsheet and will post the results with some interesting data.

I have 420 entries so far and I know there are some real fine FE's not on there. Please contribute and help me get a real good read on the Ford FE's in use out there.

Thanks. ww

11
FE Technical Forum / Possible Ignition Problem
« on: December 02, 2013, 07:25:27 PM »
I had the Galaxie out over the holiday; it loves the clear cool air. The exhaust note was strong, not missing a beat and the throttle response was real crisp. I took it out again Sunday and it ran the same way, cruising between 2500-3100 with a few wasteful displays of acceleration (out in the country BTY).

Then I started to notice small spits & pops in the exhaust note but I didnt feel anything different, know what I mean? I was about 10 miles from home by then so I aborted the ride and turned around. I got the revs back up around 3K and it sounded like it was started to break up although again I didnt feel it.

It seemed happy at 2100 (did't miss a lick) which is about 40 mph so I limped it back home. By the time I got it home it was not crisp at all, in fact it acted like a cylinder was almost out. I cant work on it till Thursday, 1st thing is look at the plugs. It wasnt puking any smoke and I didnt feel any loss of power so I dont think its fuel related. From the sounds of it Im thinking ignition, which consists of a new MSD Pro Billet distributor, a 13 year old (10K+ mile) MSD 6AL and equally old Blaster II Coil. Does this sound like an MSD box going poo poo? As always, thanks for you imput. ww

12
FE Technical Forum / PCV and A/F Ratio
« on: November 04, 2013, 09:14:46 AM »
I was talking to Woods Allen about his 64 P-Code. It's now a 445 Stroker with an 8V induction system. Woods has O2 sensors installed in both banks and a meter in the car that he can switch from side to side. He has done allot of jetting work to achieve a good A/F ratio.

He currently runs a Road Draft Tube and is considering going to a PCV System.  I raised the question if the PCV Valve would alter his A/F ratio, is a PCV Valve a somewhat controlled vacuum leak?

Woods raised the question on the FE Forum and all they can seem to do is argue about what the PCV Valve does to the engine related to oil, completly ignoring the A/F Ratio question.

So forget about the benifits/downside of a PCV valve related to oil. What impact (if any) could it have on the A/F ration with his 8V induction system. Thanks. ww

13
FE Technical Forum / Stewart Stage I Water Pump For The Ford FE
« on: July 31, 2013, 11:35:25 AM »
Does anyone have experience/feedback using the Stewart Stage I Cast Iron Water Pump on an FE. I'm considering one when I installed my new Griffin Radiator I have on ordered.  I currently have an Edelbrock.  I'm chasing the low speed/ stationary cooling issues I've had with the car from day one.. Thanks. ww

http://www.stewartcomponents.net/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Category_Code=FordSTG1

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/emp-16153/overview/make/ford

14
I ordered a new C-6 & convertor for the 445 in the red 65, from Paul at TurboAction Transmissions in Jacksonville Fl.(same folks who build the shifters). It has a blown TCI StreetFighter C-6/Convertor in it now.

After giving him all my build specs and he wanted to be sure of the diameter of the pilot hole in the back of the SCAT stroker crank (over the years there has been issues dealing with aftermarket cranks and that dimension}. He asked me to measure it but the old trans is still in.

So I tried to measure the SCAT 4.25 crank in my current 445 build with my calipers but it's hard to get a good angle with the stand in the way. My reading went from 1.831" to 1.845".

Paul says it should be 1.850 +/- .003". I called SCAT, they say it has two pilot holes, one 1.375" and one 1.845".

I know the 445 crank in the car now accepts the TCI 10" convertor connected to it successfully but I don't know what the diameter of the snout on that convertor is.

If I understand Paul correctly, his convertors require a close tollerance between the snout of the convertor and the pilot hole in the crank so that is what's centering the convertor to the crank and not the mounting points.

Please help shed some light on this. What have you measured on these cranks and what issues, if any, have you had mounting torque convertors to them? You input is greatly appreciated. ww


http://i226.photobucket.com/albums/dd31/65cobrajet428/390-445%20Build/crank_pilot_hole_spec005c2_zps269a9e21.jpg

15
I posted this on the FORDFE.COM site but I wanted to get the word out to as many as possible, Jay I hope you understand. If you wantto participate please go to the other Forum so I can get it back to John with one link.  Jay I want to provide him with a link to your site so he can see how serious we are about the Ford FE engine.  I truely believe this was an eye opener that could jead to so really neat parts for our cars.  Jay please let me know if that is ok. This is what I posted on the FORDFE Forum.

 I just got off the phone with John Hotchkis, owner of Hotchkis Sport Suspensions, we talked almost a half an hour. At the end of the call he was very excited about our conversation and that there is a big enough market for the prototype parts they made for Jay Leno’s 7 Litre.

I told him about our Forum dedicated to the Ford FE and the cars they came in.  I also made him aware that while there are growing sources to make big reliable Ford FE power, we do not have sources to readily bring the level of the suspension, steering and brakes up to the power levels we can generate.

He wanted to know about the Comet, I told him the 65 and earlier Comets shared the Mustang platform but the 66-67 Comet and Fairlanes are very popular because they are big blocks. I made him aware that the 65-67 Galaxies/Mercury’s  and 66-67 Fairlane’s/Comet’s are difficult cars to restore and modify  due to a lack of aftermarket support especially in the areas noted.

He wanted production numbers and I will provide them with some of my literature. I made him aware of the rebirth of the FE engine and the growing numbers of aftermarket parts.  I also made him aware of Barry and Survival Motorsports and his new cylinder heads.

When I send him the production information I want to link this thread so If you want to tell John about your car and the suspension pieces you would like to see him make this is your shot.  I also am going to link Barry and Jay Brown site as well as Brent at B2 and POP.  This is the real deal, the more we talked the more questions he asked.  His team recently met on this and didn’t think there was enough of a market yet. I told him we understood they needed to be able to sell enough to make it profitable. His reply was yes but we want to service the market as well.

This does not mean the parts will be available next week or next month, they currently have new projects in the pipeline. But I think we have a good shot at getting our stuff in there as well.

The focus of our talk was the 65-67 Galaxie/Mercury and 66-67 Fairlane/Comet.  So take the time to talk about your car, add some pic’s and again let John know what you need.  ww

Pages: [1] 2