Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - My427stang

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 283
1
FE Technical Forum / Re: Beneficial to put CJ valves in a 390 GT Head?
« on: November 27, 2025, 07:53:33 AM »
From a flow perspective with no other changes, no improvement

However, you gain a fresh seat surface and with a modern multi angle seat cutter you gain a little. 

With some rubbing depending on casting the gains climb to 40-50 cfm

2
Member Projects / Re: Edelbrock fuel injection install
« on: November 20, 2025, 08:39:26 AM »
I just saw this, 5 years later LOL

It's been flawless.  Sits for months, turn the key and it fires up happy.  I never changed the fuel pump, but one of these days :)  It has a 90s era Pioneer with a booster/equalizer and some big speakers that I installed when I was in my 20s, so I just crank up the music....

3
Member Projects / Re: ERA Cobra FE build - period correct
« on: November 12, 2025, 12:20:44 PM »
I am not sure what they are, will Compomotive have some sort of ID somewhere?

I also don't know the bolt pattern but can measure, going replace the race brake pads soon.

4
FE Technical Forum / Re: C5AE 390 block cast with cross bolt bosses
« on: November 05, 2025, 12:41:21 PM »
Forgive me for asking the same question again, but I think maybe I didn't do it well last time, or I am not understanding the issue.

If you are using Billet Speedworks caps, or an equivalent pan rail to pan rail cap, why not use any 4-bolt motor mount block?  You'll be cutting back the bosses anyway unless you plan to narrow the caps, or narrow them and use spacers as well.

Some say locating off the pan rail is weaker, but depending on component weight, a 2 bolt main can swing 600 HP, 6000 rpm.  The caps are located off the register not the cross bolt, so you are really only grounding harmonics and adding another plane of stability, so they really shouldn't be any twisting force.  If this is going to be a bigger machine than that, I''d think the rest of the block is going to call uncle anyway

Seems like I'd pick almost any good 390 4-bolt block, make sure registers fit nice and tight on the parting line, light fit with the pan rail requiring maybe a little lube to slide in by hand for reference, and make the block choice and machining easy

Thoughts?

5
I generally do 40 psi if I am doing one with freeze plugs.  However, I have run it up to line pressure on a couple of Genesis blocks. 

FWIW, I do mine with a torque plate and a water pump fitting, one side at a time.  I say that because mine is not a pressure tester, which generally use clamps and rubber gaskets with plexiglass or alum plates, so those certainly run lower.

I'll tell you, at 40 they bubble very clearly with soap spray.

6
Private Classifieds / Re: 68 Cobra Jet Mustang on BAT
« on: October 27, 2025, 07:36:40 AM »
That is the former Phil Glass car. David Garton found the car and mechanically restored it. It is OG paint and Blair Patrick built the engine. No maybe to the story its real deal!

I can confirm that, I was a small part of it when the car came up years back.  David researched, bought and got it back to it's glory.  Very cool ride, and nothing he owns is junk, lots of cool toys.

7
FE Technical Forum / Re: Head gaskets
« on: October 27, 2025, 06:33:12 AM »
In an engine like the 462 above, changing a Felpro 1020 to a 4.20 bore only gains .084:1 compression, 10.315 to 10.399.  Not sure I'd bother for the money.

However to answer the question, I have only done a couple at 4.375 and used a 4.40 Cometic and worked well.  So I would not be afraid of a 4.160 engine, assuming a properly prepped flat surface and a Cometic with a 4.190 or larger bore. 

Test fit if going close though, because every so often you get a weird one from Cometic, not common and I use them all the time, but have seen a couple that the bore was not centered

8
FE Technical Forum / Re: Lack of oil to rear lifters
« on: October 27, 2025, 06:19:40 AM »
It's the amount of oil.   No wonder the lifters were clacking.

If it's a Canton T-sump oil pan, regardless if it's the higher end road race pan or not, the *system capacity* is 8 quarts.  That means 7 quarts in the pan, 1 in the oil filter.

You're still running too low of oil.

Spot on, I use both styles of Canton all the time, and 2 of my toys have it.  8 quart system. Here is from their page.  "This high capacity front sump is for all Ford 332-428FE blocks. "T" style sump to increase capacity without losing ground clearance. It has a 6" deep, 12-1/2" wide by 10" long sump with a 8 quart system capacity."

https://www.cantonracingproducts.com/products/15-810-oil-pan-for-ford-332-428-fe-high-capacity-front-t-sump-street-pan.html

Good news is that next oil change you can go back to affordable oil :)


9
FE Technical Forum / Re: C5AE 390 block cast with cross bolt bosses
« on: October 25, 2025, 01:59:39 PM »
Ross, does that block have a oil return in the skirt?

It does not

10
FE Technical Forum / Re: C5AE 390 block cast with cross bolt bosses
« on: October 24, 2025, 01:55:45 PM »
Urgefor,

Do you need the C5 and/or the bosses for a specific reason?  As I understood you were using aftermarket caps.  They are wide to allow direct contact without the bosses if that is attractive to you.

I do have a C6 block in Nebraska, std bore, pressure checked, but not cleaned or magged.  Not chasing a sale, stock for later incoming builds, but if it helped you out of a bind I'd be happy to flip

11
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Any pilots on here?
« on: October 21, 2025, 01:10:04 PM »
Aviate, navigate, communicate, and don’t think you failed if you screwed up. Debrief it and own it with a solution for the next time

12
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: 541 cubic inch FE drag and drive
« on: October 19, 2025, 05:26:33 PM »
No SCATs 3.98 have FE rod bearings. I wish they did have that option to use a better bearing and longer rod, or at least an FE I beam to get some weight down on the cast crank builds

13
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: 541 cubic inch FE drag and drive
« on: October 19, 2025, 03:47:39 PM »
I understand but I wasn’t talking about a stock crank. I thought when scat makes them you can get them as a steel crank and they were the same 2.20 journals as the 4.250 cranks. That being said I understand what you are saying.

When you got off the subject with the 400 inch boost motor a lot of guys around here are running blow through carbs with procharger. My buddy a few houses down (Chevy 540) makes 638 naturally aspirated with 600 lbs torque with procharger he makes 1070 Hp and 1247 lbs of torque. Makes me want one maybe next setup.

I was only teasing...

Boost is fun, we did a 347 2 years ago or so, 585 HP on 8 lbs of boost, sounded like a Granada at idle, HP curve looked like a steep mountain.  Would have made more if we spun the blower faster, but we were afraid of the block splitting in two!

14
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: 541 cubic inch FE drag and drive
« on: October 19, 2025, 06:49:56 AM »
What would be the benefit of a 4.0 crank than just using a 428 3.98 arm. Besides cubic inches.

I'll take a stab...10K RPM on a cast crank at those power levels may not end well :)

15
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: 541 cubic inch FE drag and drive
« on: October 17, 2025, 12:27:24 PM »
What a wicked build.  Incredible heads on top as well

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 283