1
FE Engine Dyno Results / Re: 1967 Ford Fastlane street motor.
« on: March 01, 2026, 04:25:08 PM »
Certainly a runner, nice numbers
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think Ross has a thing for 489s.
However, the next four will be 347 SBF, then 496, 505, and 511 FEs, A couple of 390s may sneak in there too.If people don't think 220 is hot then what is hot in a street car?
Get the biggest radiator you can fit crossflow best and bigger pump like Jay said you could try lowering your fan starting temp too I would start at 160
You can run any of the factory FE rockers with a hydraulic roller. With hydraulic roller spring loads, I would run end stands and I prefer to run a solid spacer in between the rockers instead of springs.
You’ll have to weigh the costs of the items that you’ll need to buy against buying a complete kit.
Agree 100% with this. Although I really like roller tip rockers - they effectively uncouple the rocker from the valve tip - makes for better guide life.
First time I did a hydraulic roller with OE nonadjustable rockers it was for a budget conscious stroker, and I was kinda stunned at how well it ran. Removing that swinging 7/16 bolt (AKA adjuster) from the rocking mass added an easy couple hundred RPM of smooth power to an already known and tested combination.
I've got factory non-adjustable rockers on Dennis Towle's 390 in his Galaxie wagon. Hundreds of passes at the track, thousands of street miles, no issues. Run those with a pretty spicy hydraulic roller and about 400 lbs of spring load over the nose.
QuoteI know you get it, and in general, a 10 degree split is a decent cam for the head, but is 42 degrees of overlap at .020 and 7 at .050 right, then consider lash effects? I'd want a reason or two to pick something like that with a head that can use some help to pull on the port (especially if the intended use needed it) and I'd want to know compression before I flirted telling a guy it would be happy.
Food for thought:
First, I never said my cam would be optimal, for anything!
But, I believe my cam specs will give better fuel mileage, and higher hp, above above 4k. As well as be a bit better on octane tolerance, up to 10/1 CR using a 4° adjustment.
That's assuming Brent's would be 109 LSA +4° but, he didn't say.
Average hp to 5.8k would be very close.
Cam challenge anyone?