Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - thatdarncat

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 131
1
FE Technical Forum / Re: 406 Heads more info
« on: July 10, 2026, 12:09:44 AM »
Is the “63” on your head, like the number I have circled here, on this internet picture?


2
FE Technical Forum / Re: 406 Heads more info
« on: July 09, 2026, 11:55:27 PM »
Just so we’re all on the same page, I assume you mean the date code is CAST in, and not stamped, I just wanted to be sure since old engine parts often have machine shop stamped codes on them, which could mean anything.

The casting date of “2J14” is actually 1962 September 14th.

I’m guessing the “63”, if it’s what I’m thinking you’re describing, is probably a random mold pattern number, you’ll find them on many sides of a Ford FE cast part.

3
FE Technical Forum / Re: 65-66 427 2X4 intake
« on: June 29, 2026, 06:16:40 PM »
I’m pretty sure it does take the large thermostat. A friend had one of those ‘65-‘66 2-4 bbl Medium Riser intakes without the engineering numbers, and I thought I might have a picture, but haven’t found it yet. But Ford didn’t even have a FE thermostat housing for the small thermostat yet in ‘65, that didn’t start getting phased in until during the ‘67 model year.

I think it’s probably the same for both, but there was also ‘65 427 Low Riser 2-4 bbl intake manifold, so you may want to specify which one if you think it matters.

4
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: Coolant
« on: May 09, 2026, 10:57:58 AM »
My dad uses it. I run 1 gallon of it and the rest water. It’s like 52 dollars a gallon so we drain it carefully it’s like gold. Not exactly sure if it runs any cooler but supposedly it’s NHRA legal. Normally I drain my coolant before I go to the track and run like a water wetter but I think your allowed to run this stuff at the track. If anyone knows for sure let me know

There is no NHRA rule that prohibits running any kind of antifreeze at the track. Conversely, there is no NHRA rule requiring any particular kind, or brand, of antifreeze either. An individual track may make their own rule prohibiting antifreeze, or requiring water only, and some might, but it’s not an NHRA rule.

Mind you, I’m not suggesting it’s a good idea, or recommending it, but it’s not something most tracks even ask or check for in tech inspection. This question comes up all the time on various “Drag & Drive” forums, especially those for events run when the weather turns cold.

The NHRA rule book is available online now days for anyone that wants to check.

5
FE Technical Forum / Re: P code 390 Block
« on: May 08, 2026, 09:49:58 PM »
i had a solid lift 390 that came out of a 64,i thought that was the last year

Nope, top of the line 390 Police Interceptor for 1965 was solid lifter. Here’s a screenshot from the 1965 Ford Police car brochure


6
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: E-85
« on: May 02, 2026, 08:25:33 PM »
Thank you guys for all the responses. I haven’t been able to get on the forum for three days it wouldn’t hook me up to server. Maybe my iPad is getting old….

I had trouble getting on the forum here from my phone for a few days this past week too, might not have been your iPad. Just a FYI.

7
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: E-85
« on: April 29, 2026, 12:59:11 PM »
I don’t have any personal experience, but follow the subject casually like some others. Getting a little deeper into the question is probably warranted, as others touched on.

Why are you thinking about E85? How are you using the vehicle - race, street toy, more daily driver?

Are you planning on using pump E85 at random filling stations, or buying dedicated E85 barrels from a fuel supplier?


There are now quite a few “Drag & Drive” type events, similar to Hot Rod Drag Week, around the U.S. every year, and quite a few competitors that run E-85, especially if it’s available near the route, if there’s one of these events near you it might be a good idea to check one out and talk to the participants for their experience. Most folks like talking about their combination, providing they’re not deep in a mad thrash. And I do know, like already mentioned, those people all carry E-85 test kits with them, to monitor what they’re getting at the local station, which is why the question of what you plan to use is important.

8
Non-FE Discussion Forum / Re: The calandar
« on: April 27, 2026, 02:53:10 PM »
And the two after that...

Don’t forget 430 day too! A whole 4 day holiday.

9
Well, that just sucks  :'(

10
Warning - Buyer Beware / Re: Buyer Beware - Bill Coon
« on: March 08, 2026, 02:26:37 PM »
It seems that Bill Coon has met his demise.  Here's a "glowing" piece that omits the less savory stuff...



Maybe not, multiple people commented on the post that Bill is still alive and they recently talked to him. Not everything on the Internet is true lol.

11
FE Technical Forum / Re: Weird find, possible 390PI?
« on: February 15, 2026, 06:18:40 PM »
Transmission is E0AP

That's a 1980 or later FMX.

Dipstick tube hole in the case?

He’s correct, check where the dipstick goes in. I was going off the early bellhousing, I could be wrong. But in any case, see if there’s an I.D. code on it too, not just the main case casting number.

12
FE Technical Forum / Re: Weird find, possible 390PI?
« on: February 15, 2026, 02:51:22 PM »
I ran across this engine recently. It is a C3AE-6015-H block, C3AE-E crank and C1AE skinny rods. Possibly a 390PI?But my big question is what trans is this that was with it? I've never seen one. Possible FMX? My dad is saying looks like a C4 but he's not sure.

Many people mistakenly call any of those early Cruise-O-Matic transmissions a “FMX”, but the FMX didn’t exist until the 1968 model year, the one you have is obviously older than that, so it’s an earlier variant, and not actually a FMX. And it’s absolutely not a C4. Many of those early Cruise-O-Matics & Ford-O-Matics have an oval I.D. tag on the side with a tag number that can be looked up, I’ve circled the location on your picture. CAREFULLY clean the oily dirt from there and see if there’s a tag. I emphasize carefully because some of the tag codes are just printed on the tag, and I’ve seen lots where people accidentally cleaned the numbers off it. See what you find there and then come back with the info and we can try and look it up in the Ford Parts Books.

What makes you suspect it’s a 390 PI ?


13
Vendor Classifieds / Re: "Blank" cam bearings for aftermarket blocks...
« on: January 27, 2026, 07:30:50 PM »
No sir, I sure didn't.  Just checked my PM's and nothing was there.

Got it noted, will put yours in with Jay's when they show up.

Thank you very much. Jay’s aware.

14
Vendor Classifieds / Re: "Blank" cam bearings for aftermarket blocks...
« on: January 27, 2026, 01:19:30 PM »
Brent, I sent you a PM a few weeks ago thru the forum here to order 3, and add them to Jay Brown’s order, not sure if you got the message? Thanks.

15
FE Technical Forum / Re: Aluminum Ford intake ID
« on: January 26, 2026, 09:25:35 PM »
Here’s another early 427 medium riser intake manifold that turns up occasionally. You’ll notice that it doesn’t have an engineering number cast on it. One other identifying feature of these is that they don’t have the typical throttle linkage bosses cast on the rear of the manifold on the #8 runner. So far all of these I’ve seen people post have had a date code above the thermostat housing, either “11-64” or “12-64” like this one.


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 131