Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Hotrodjohn71

Pages: [1] 2
1
Private Classifieds / Re: Wanted 2x4 oval air cleaner
« on: April 13, 2026, 07:49:12 PM »
Now Im only looking for a base.

2
Private Classifieds / Re: Wanted: set Holley 1850
« on: March 02, 2026, 10:10:08 PM »
I have found a set.

Admin. Please remove this post.

Thanks,
John

3
Private Classifieds / Wanted: set Holley 1850
« on: February 24, 2026, 04:35:27 PM »
I'm looking for a set of Holly 1850 600 CFM carburetors.
I'm looking for either the -1, -2 or -3 versions. Rebuildable condition is okay.

Thanks, John

4
Looked good.

5
FE Technical Forum / Re: 6v and 8v air cleaner differences question
« on: February 13, 2026, 04:35:45 PM »
Thank you fellas. I understand now.

John

6
FE Technical Forum / 6v and 8v air cleaner differences question
« on: February 11, 2026, 10:49:23 PM »
Is there a difference in the oval Ford air cleaner top plate between the 6v and 8v air cleaners?

Is there a difference in the holes spacing?

How can I tell whats what?

Thanks,
John

7
Private Classifieds / Wanted 2x4 oval air cleaner
« on: February 10, 2026, 10:38:14 PM »
Looking for this dual quad (not tri-power) air cleaner assembly.

Any condition o.k.

John

8
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cam Grind Suggestions
« on: January 31, 2026, 12:54:09 PM »
There is so much more to this camshaft decision than I imagined. I am learing alot just reading your responses.
For practical reasons and upon considering the pros and cons I have learned heretofore,  I think I will want to go with a Hydraulic roller lifter cam instead of the pre mentioned solid flat tappet option.

Even though I wanted the sound and feel of a SFT that I had before, I also feel like my preferences can evolve in favor of a possibly better and more durable roller lifter which wont need a break-in and will allow me to not have to keep zddp in the oil.

I think I would rather not go with roller rockers as from my research,  the good reliable kits are very expensive.
 And not altogether sure my cam lift will be over .550 so would I be ok utilizing a stock Ford or Isky stock style adjustable rocker with an appropriate length pushrod with the Hydraulic roller cam?

My driving style these days will not be bracket racing or going to the track too much. I will be driving around town but want to be able to blast down the country roads from time to time.

I realize what you are saying about needing data to evaluate what a good grind would be. Head cc info, and other data.

I will gather that information over the next months as this build (and the car) are in the very preliminary stages. I have a TON of rust repair.

Meanwhile I will be reading and learning more.


9
FE Technical Forum / Re: Manifold vacuum Advance
« on: January 30, 2026, 12:03:25 PM »
Edit

10
FE Technical Forum / Manifold vacuum Advance
« on: January 30, 2026, 11:50:46 AM »
I realize i have other threads going on the forum for which i am very grateful for the input, but if you would bear with me. I will open this can of worms.

Please walk me through and help me undetstand the process for setting timing on an FE engine before ported vacuum became the norm.

May I share a bit of my personal experience in this area. I restored a '67 326 Firebird for my wife. My goal was originality.  When it came to the engine, it was factory setup with manifold vacuum advance  and had a 2GC Rochester (no port for advance), and a steel tube going from the original distributor vacuum cannister straight to manifold vacuum.

I had never setup an engine to run of manifold vacuum nor had it been a consideration, but i realized i needed to either look for a similar Rochester with the port for vacuum advance (which there are a few) or proceeded with restoring the exhisting process.

I went on a forum and threw out my question and as you probably can surmise,  I got strong arguments for and against manifold vacuum advance.  I did alot of research at the time about the theorey of high advance at idle and the combustion process and the cooler temps and all the pros and cons of both (much of which I have forgotten).

In the midst of all of that, a member reached out to me with a process for setup of timing that I never heard of but I decided to try it. I have had my wifes Firebird tuned this way for years now and it runs like a top. It has never knocked or pinged. Runs cool  always fires right up and has great power (for a 2bbl 326).



Here is a cut * paste of the procedure shared with me:

"Hi John.

Set the initial timing with VA disconnected. If the engine is stock, high compression, 6-8* is good. If it has a cam, or is low comp [ 7.5-9:5:1 CR ], I would increase the initial timing to about 10-12*. Make sure you use an adj VA unit such as the Crane. Adjust the Allen screw fully CW [ softest setting ] as a starting point.

The TOTAL amount of VA that is added is governed by the travel of the actuator. This is adjustable with the Crane unit using the notched plate.

The timing at idle can be anything from 30 to 55* [ yup, 55* for really radical combos ]. Note that until 1968 when we got the useless PVA for emission reasons, Pontiacs left showroom floors idling with 26*, 6* init + 20* MVA. So increasing a few degrees to 30ish is still conservative.

To determine the reqd timing at idle: Disconnect VA for this test. Chock wheels, warm up engine, put into gear if auto, engine idling. Loosen dist clamp & SLOWLY turn dist CW [ advances timing ]. Rpm increases. Keep going CW until max rpm/smoothest idle is obtained; toggle dist to make sure you have highest rpm.
Now check timing. You may need a timing tape on the dampener. Do not be surprised if it is well above 30*.
Whatever it is, that is the 'sweet spot' for your engine. The adj VA units can add about 30*. Use any combination of init + MVA to attain the reqd idle timing.
Once you have dialled in idle timing, idle mixture & speed can be reset.

There is some on PY who don't like MVA. One person, who gets the Prima Donna treatment, & uses all sort of exaggeration & idiotic lies to discredit it's use. One of his favourite sayings, & I saw it this week, is 'timing clear off the scale'. The only timing scale I am aware of is the two full revolutions of a 4 stroke engine, which is 720*. If idle timing was 36*, that represents 5% of the total available. 5% of ANYTHING is hardly 'clear off the scale'. PM anytime.
Cheers.

Not sure how far we got. But you have the sweet spot, which is the total vac adv that gets applied. Now for the RATE adjustment, in case I didn't give that to you. This gets done after the sweet spot is done & engine is idling with this.
Turn the Allen Key [ AK ], 3/32", fully CW. This the softest spring setting.

Engine idling, in gear if auto, turn AK 2 turns CCW & re-check timing. Keep going 2 turns CCW, & checking timing each time. At some point timing will probably become unsteady or drop. At this point, go back 3 turns CW. Job done!

Your reference to max advance. I presume you mean init + centri + VA. That is usually 45-55*, but can be over 60* with a big cam & low comp ratio.

Hope this helps, feel free to PM.
Cheers."

Now I would like to know what the process was for the early Ford FE motors that Ford used before ported vacuum became the norm


I would like to compare it to this proces listed above which works well but I want to also gain some more good knowledge.

Thank you

11
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cam Grind Suggestions
« on: January 27, 2026, 07:45:30 PM »
Thank you.

I greatly appreciate and highly value all the advice. I take everything into consideration.

12
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cam Grind Suggestions
« on: January 27, 2026, 02:14:27 PM »
I like this Howards cam suggested by Frnkeore:

252342-10 CL252342-10 265 265 230 230 .560 .560 110 106 .022 .022 1,13

Is anyone using this cam? Id like to know how the idle and idle vacuum is.

13
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cam Grind Suggestions
« on: January 22, 2026, 01:21:37 PM »
Thank you.
I didnt realize the SFT's were getting hard to find.

It is a 4 speed car and presently has a booster for power front discs (GT model), but if vacuum should be an issue, I would think I could add a vac reservoir cannister.

I do like the sound of a solid lifter cam. Do they offer a solid roller lifter the same height as a SFT?

14
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cam Grind Suggestions
« on: January 22, 2026, 12:40:51 PM »
Thank you,
I appreciate and welcome all input.
I am new to the forum but not to FE Fords.
Been out of the game a couple decades.

Im trying to recapture the feel of the solid lifter 67 mustang I used to have and have lost alot of knowledge over the years.

I respect the experience shared here.

15
FE Technical Forum / Cam Grind Suggestions
« on: January 22, 2026, 11:15:47 AM »
Goodmorning,

I would like to ask the group for suggestions on the specs of the cam for this engine that Im going to be putting together to go into my 67 Mustang GT.

I want to use a solid lifter cam and utilize stock ford adjustable rocker arms.

The engine is the 390 original motor from my 67 Mustang GT. Standard bore. It will have 428 Cobra Jet heads, Ford low Riser dual quad intake with 600 CFM carburetors, and Tube headers.

This will be a street driven car, not necessarily for going to the track every day. I'm looking for a decent idle.

Thank you

Pages: [1] 2