1
FE Technical Forum / Re: Cleveland intake with Dale’s adapter
« on: August 15, 2024, 04:22:34 PM »
Thanks guys! I was afraid I’d get shamed for asking the question.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
You won’t fit a 4.5” stroke in a BBM block with a cam in the middle...
Lol, they kinda neglected to mention that on the features list!
I haven't tried one, but if Jay says it will work with some grinding/carving on the rods, then it should work. Normally a 4.375" stroke is where it starts getting close on things.
You won’t fit a 4.5” stroke in a BBM block with a cam in the middle...
I have the engine in the 2nd link...620 lb ft towing...in my ‘65 F250. Five years and around 15,000 miles I just drive it....mostly freeway. With hydraulic lifters I don’t believe you have any adjusting. I run 91 gas...probably be fine with 89 but I haul and do some towing so I stick with 91.
I wouldn’t call it radical though it does have a very mild rumble at idle. Would definitely feel comfortable cruising the entire country. It’s easily controllable and pleasant both in town and freeway. With 4.10 rear and gear vender it turns 2300ish rpms at 70 mph.
Power-wise it is lively with very good street manners for in-town driving. For comparison and since you mention diesels, we have a stock tuned LB7 duramax that we really like and feel adequate pulling our 5 ton plus camper all over the country. My ‘65 will outrun the LB7 when both trucks are empty as well as when both are hitched to our camper. The LB7 has enough power and I have no desire to tune it or buy a newer diesel, so hopefully the comparison gives you a little idea what my 482 runs and drives like. In fact, if something happened to our LB7, I would seriously consider dropping my 482 and NP435 with gear vender overdrive into a newer Ford for cross country camper trips...because it runs that well, has not required fiddling, and pulls plenty strong for how I use it.
Greetings from a Country Squire daily driver owner.
To add a little fun in your driving, Hotchkiss makes a suspension setup for Galaxies that will bolt directly on. It takes a lot of room in the rear for the sway bar so you have to route exhaust carefully, but it does work. Also you’d think that being a wagon the rear springs would be to light. They work perfectly. People freak when I rip a corner. Fun.
As far as engine, I’m heading for either a Vortech or a turbo up. Just depends on how much fabbing fun I want to have.
Have you got some pics?
The "More More More" desire for HP tapers off for street use but never seems to diminish at the track. If this is meant to be a street car, and no drag racing, I would recommend keeping it in the 450-500hp range. That's just the "golden zone" recipe for a fun car that you can bomb around in, not feel guilty, and stay out of trouble for the most part.
If it was my car I'd put in a Vortech V7 supercharger at about 8 pounds of boost, a very mild hydraulic roller cam, either the Tremec trans or a C4 with a Gear Vendors overdrive, and 3.91 gears. Figure on about 450 foot pounds of torque and 400 HP naturally aspirated, and 650 foot pounds of torque and 600 HP with the supercharger.
I'm building a 462" at the moment that hits many of the same things you're trying to do. A lot of it will come down to how much gear you're going with, and what transmission. I run a TKO500 with 4.10 gear in my Mercury, which nets out at 2200rpm @ 70mph. A drive it on highways and 60mph secondary roads a lot, so my build is dictated by this. The cam profile has to be able to handle 1800rpm in overdrive without balking. That said, I do drive it hard and with the 4.10s I like to have RPM flexibility...in other words have my cake and eat it too. My car weighs 4070lbs, I'd assume your car would be heavier being a wagon. I don't really consider this that heavy if you look at modern vehicle weights, but if going with a mild gear it will take some thought. Trans combo with the deep first gear and cam means I can get away with quite a bit of cam if desired.
My current engine in this combo is a 390 with a 224/232* cam, and it easily pulls the car at 1800rpm and pulls pretty well to 5800rpm with BBM heads. The key is having good flowing heads so you can make the HP goal without requiring a lot of duration on the cam.
I think the builds you're showing are perfect for the combo, and similar to what I'm building. I'll be going with a 235/239* cam, which should scale well from what I have considering the increase in displacement. The TFS heads are small cross section and will give a lot of lowend, but easily support the displacement and rpm I'm looking for, and will do it with relatively mild cam requirements.
As far as being radical at these levels, I don't think so at all. My 390 has a decent idle, but beyond that it's a baby around town, no issues at all shifting it at 2500rpm and just puttering around town. Knock on wood, no issues with the engine at all minus a few annoying leaks. If you want to run 87oct, again I'd think it's just a matter of paying attention to quench distance, making sure compression is reasonable, and making sure the cam matches the combo. I run a true 9.2:1 compresson with the 224* and it runs fine on 87 even though I'm at .055 on quench which isn't optimal (I do run 93 quite a bit, but if I'm taking a long trip I just run 87). Not sure where you live but I'd pay attention to choke and cold start performance if it's a true daily driver. I don't run a heat crossover and have a manual choke, my 390 has always been pretty cold natured. It starts fine in 30* weather but takes quite a bit of fiddling to keep running, and takes quite awhile to really warm up and run well....that impacts the street ability much more than the rest of the combo IMO