Whenever I come across "information" on a website I ALWAYS try to keep focused on what the website operator is trying to accomplish.
In most cases they are trying to garner clicks to generate income...and the rest can be figured out later.
Never forget Uncle Tony is working to generate clicks as his first and foremost intent.
His incorrect information on the site certainly does generate clicks and participation as many will participate there to either agree or set him straight...all while Tony hears the cash bell dinging as the "debate" rages.
The other thing I do is ask myself a few questions.
1) Do I have to be right on this internet site?
2) Will my correct information remove the incorrect information, or will it simply become noise in the background of this poor site?
3) Will my efforts to correct the mistakes change any minds?
In today's mentality of believe what feels good and makes me happy I don't see any minds being changed regardless of the tangible proof and evidence.
Yup, you found Uncle Tony's Garage wrong yet again...and you sort of knew it was probably going to be suspect at best, and likely wrong already, so why bother getting involved because the past has proven to garner no change in how that site operates.
The line from the song "The Boxer", by Simon and Garfunkel, comes to mind here.
"Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest."
I think that sums up what is happening on that site (and all over for that matter) as the site generates clicks and income for Uncle Tony.
Very well thought out response, cleandan. What I would like to see happen is, one of the knowledgeable heavy hitters in the Ford camp release a video showing UTs ignorant and sometimes outright false statements on what really transpired in Grand National and NHRA racing in the 1960s through present day. I have neither the talent nor the means to do so.
I know getting in a war of words on the internet is pretty much folly, but for whatever reason this deal just irks me.
UT is only a few years older than me so he never "lived it" , meaning was involved in the racing scene of the 1960s like some of his subscribers seem to think. He was alive then, but that's it. I don't take away his knowledge of Mopars, but it seems to me his knowledge of Ford is more what he has been told than experienced.
A parting note, he really has a lot of subs who really hate Ford and Ford guys. Many of the comments call us stupid, idiots, special etc. I really don't get the vitriol.
In the end, I just hope the truth wins out.